GNU bug report logs - #18481
vc/vc-git.el: use `with-demoted-errors' instead of `ignore-errors'.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Emilio Lopes <eclig <at> gmx.net>

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:43:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 18481 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Emilio Lopes <eclig <at> gmx.net>
Subject: bug#18481: vc/vc-git.el: use `with-demoted-errors' instead of `ignore-errors'.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:06:21 -0700
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Emilio Lopes <eclig <at> gmx.net> writes:
>
>> cf. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2014-09/msg00394.html
>>
>> --- lisp/ChangeLog    2014-09-15 00:20:21 +0000
>> +++ lisp/ChangeLog    2014-09-15 13:36:10 +0000
>> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
>> +2014-09-15  Emilio C. Lopes  <eclig <at> gmx.net>
>> +
>> +    * vc/vc-git.el (vc-git-registered): use `with-demoted-errors'
>> +    instead of `ignore-errors' so that the user is informed if
>> +    something unexpected happens.
>
> (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately have not received
> any responses yet.)
>
> So, in that URL Stefan suggested using with-demoted-errors instead of
> ignore-errors here, and that seems sensible.  But I'm wondering whether
> this code is expected to fail, and whether the errors (in that case) are
> totally uninteresting?
>
> I've done some testing (without the `ignore-errors'), and in my tests
> the code doesn't fail, so I think the patch suggested makes sense.
>
> Does this patch makes sense to everybody else, too?

I'm not a heavy user of vc, but FWIW it seems to me that it should be
safe enough to catch fewer errors.  Maybe we could just install it and
see what blows up, if the patch works for you...

> (defun vc-git-registered (file)
>   "Check whether FILE is registered with git."
>   (let ((dir (vc-git-root file)))
>     (when dir
>       (with-temp-buffer
>         (let* (process-file-side-effects
>                ;; Do not use the `file-name-directory' here: git-ls-files
>                ;; sometimes fails to return the correct status for relative
>                ;; path specs.
>                ;; See also: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125787684318129&w=2
>                (name (file-relative-name file dir))
>                (str (ignore-errors
>                       (cd dir)
>                       (vc-git--out-ok "ls-files" "-c" "-z" "--" name)
>                       ;; If result is empty, use ls-tree to check for deleted
>                       ;; file.
>                       (when (eq (point-min) (point-max))
>                         (vc-git--out-ok "ls-tree" "--name-only" "-z" "HEAD"
>                                         "--" name))
>                       (buffer-string))))
>           (and str
>                (> (length str) (length name))
>                (string= (substring str 0 (1+ (length name)))
>                         (concat name "\0"))))))))
>
>
>>                 ;; path specs.
>>                 ;; See also: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=125787684318129&w=2
>>                 (name (file-relative-name file dir))
>> -               (str (ignore-errors
>> +               (str (with-demoted-errors "Error: %S"
>>                        (cd dir)
>>                        (vc-git--out-ok "ls-files" "-c" "-z" "--" name)
>>                        ;; If result is empty, use ls-tree to check for deleted

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 278 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.