GNU bug report logs -
#18480
24.3.93; Popups "broken" with lines of different heights
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 18480 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Sebastien Vauban <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org.
(Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
As demo'ed with this Org file, enabling completion mechanisms such as AC
or Company shows graphical glitches when themes have heights != 1.0.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#+TITLE: ECM for popup
#+DATE: \today
* Context
When using a theme (such as Leuven theme) with different heights, the completion
popups are graphically broken.
* Title inserted here on purpose
The above title spreads away part of the nice popup window.
** Other subtitle
Foo.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Screenshots:
- http://screencast.com/t/oA0vurx3 for Auto-Complete
- http://screencast.com/t/OgP9vMBobjV for Company
Video:
See http://screencast.com/t/NNKTO7Nrivz:
- first enabling only AC mode
- then only Company mode
Best regards,
Seb
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:26:15 +0200
>
> As demo'ed with this Org file, enabling completion mechanisms such as AC
> or Company shows graphical glitches when themes have heights != 1.0.
Since neither of these packages is part of Emacs, I think you should
report this to the respective developers instead.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:15:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> As demo'ed with this Org file, enabling completion mechanisms such as AC
>> or Company shows graphical glitches when themes have heights != 1.0.
> Since neither of these packages is part of Emacs, I think you should
> report this to the respective developers instead.
Since Company is part of GNU ELPA, I think it's OK to report its bugs here.
In any case, I'm pretty sure this is a known limitation that will only
be lifted when those packages start using "lightweight frames" or "GUI
menus" or something like that, and I think those will require changes to
the C code.
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news <at> mygooglest.com>, 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:13:48 -0400
>
> >> As demo'ed with this Org file, enabling completion mechanisms such as AC
> >> or Company shows graphical glitches when themes have heights != 1.0.
> > Since neither of these packages is part of Emacs, I think you should
> > report this to the respective developers instead.
>
> Since Company is part of GNU ELPA, I think it's OK to report its bugs here.
> In any case, I'm pretty sure this is a known limitation that will only
> be lifted when those packages start using "lightweight frames" or "GUI
> menus" or something like that, and I think those will require changes to
> the C code.
Maybe so, but I think the respective developers should first be given
chance to fix this or improve it, if they can. Only if the developers
come to the conclusion that there are fundamental problems that
prevent the solution, then they should come here with the details.
Alternatively, the OP could look into the sources and make sure these
are not simple bugs in those packages, then explain all that in the
report.
Failing any of these, I don't see how filing this report can be of any
use. I mean, who will look at this?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Failing any of these, I don't see how filing this report can be of any
> use. I mean, who will look at this?
To the extent that I'd like to fold the core of Company into Emacs, we
will ;-)
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:35:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2014-09-15, at 21:13, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> Failing any of these, I don't see how filing this report can be of any
>> use. I mean, who will look at this?
>
> To the extent that I'd like to fold the core of Company into Emacs, we
> will ;-)
Just to ask: are we closing this?
> Stefan
Best,
--
mbork
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork <at> mbork.pl>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, sva-news <at> mygooglest.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:34:39 +0100
>
> On 2014-09-15, at 21:13, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> >> Failing any of these, I don't see how filing this report can be of any
> >> use. I mean, who will look at this?
> >
> > To the extent that I'd like to fold the core of Company into Emacs, we
> > will ;-)
>
> Just to ask: are we closing this?
FWIW, I'd still like to hear from the maintainers of the respective
packages. I don't see any of them speak their mind about this bug
report.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 02/19/2016 10:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Just to ask: are we closing this?
The bug is still present.
> FWIW, I'd still like to hear from the maintainers of the respective
> packages. I don't see any of them speak their mind about this bug
> report.
Clément is looking into the alternatives, and it seems like he'll end up
implementing the necessary changes in the core himself.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#18480; Package
emacs.
(Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:12:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: sva-news <at> mygooglest.com, 18480 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:22:47 +0200
>
> On 02/19/2016 10:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I'd still like to hear from the maintainers of the respective
> > packages. I don't see any of them speak their mind about this bug
> > report.
>
> Clément is looking into the alternatives, and it seems like he'll end up
> implementing the necessary changes in the core himself.
Thanks. So I think we should leave this open and wait for the
resolution.
This bug report was last modified 9 years and 116 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.