GNU bug report logs - #18221
MIT/GNU Scheme fails to build on non-Intel platforms

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:49:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Subject: bug#18221: closed (Close)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:51:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#18221: MIT/GNU Scheme fails to build on non-Intel platforms

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 18221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
18221: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18221
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 18221-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:50:48 +0100
The bug stricto sensu has been fixed by a "supported systems" clause.
Since in more than 4 years nobody seems to have missed the package on
other architectures, I am closing the bug for now.

Andreas


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Source of mit-scheme
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:47:57 +0200
Hello,

mit-scheme fails to build on mips64el-linux, because specific source is not
downloaded for this system. Furthermore, I wonder if in the corresponding
lines
  (match (%current-system)
    ("x86_64-linux" "x86-64")
    ("i686-linux" "i386")
    (_ "c"))
one need not also check for the target system in the usual manner.
Here the "c" should be the empty string, I think, and the preceding "-"
should be included into "x86-64" and "i386".

As the source field is set to #f, the command
  guix build mit-scheme -S
fails with a confusing error message.

Is all this worth it, or should we not revert to a generic build recipe?

Andreas




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 148 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.