GNU bug report logs - #17978
24.3; forward-paragraph broken with javadocs

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Justine Tunney <jart <at> google.com>

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 18:14:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 24.3

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 17978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Justine Tunney <jart <at> google.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 17978 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#17978: 24.3; forward-paragraph broken with javadocs
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 19:40:50 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Assume that I have the following Java source, where # indicates the cursor
position:

/**
 * Does stuff.
 *
 * <p>Hello
 *
 * @see FooBar
 */
private void lol() {}
#


So I press C-{ and this is what happens:


/**
 * Does stuff.
 *
 * <p>Hello
 *
#* @see FooBar
 */
private void lol() {}


And then I press it again:


/**
 * Does stuff.
 *
#* <p>Hello
 *
 * @see FooBar
 */
private void lol() {}


And here's what I expected to happen:


#
/**
 * Does stuff.
 *
 * <p>Hello
 *
 * @see FooBar
 */
private void lol() {}


C-{ and C-} should cycle between blank lines. But the reason why this
doesn't happen in java-mode, is because Java redefines the definition of a
paragraph. It sets the paragraph-start variable (among other variables) so
that when I M-q to fill-paragraph, it'll work correctly *within* the
Javadoc, rather than reflowing my code into a jumbled mess.


On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

> > I included a video explanation: http://youtu.be/cXerimuxNK8
>
> Could you just send plain text showing an example piece of code, then
> a command you use on it, the end result you get and the end result you'd
> like to get instead?
>
> That's surely easier to do, and will save me the trouble of dealing with
> videos which I find unbearable (you can't just look at them, you have to
> additionally listen to them; if you get distracted along the way you end
> up having to start over; half the time there's a technical problem; you
> can't choose the speed at which you "read/view", so you have to wait
> for irrelevant crap before getting to the point; it's a huge waste of
> bandwidth).
>
>
>         Stefan
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 98 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.