GNU bug report logs - #16228
Error in 'diff3' man page

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#16228: closed (Error in 'diff3' man page)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:44:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:43:14 -0800
with message-id <CA+8g5KE_GjPFj3KUGQM=YUQGXsdvd8qX5Yi1XzFCiq78Zvcr+w <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16228: Error in 'diff3' man page
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16228,
regarding Error in 'diff3' man page
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
16228: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16228
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jamie Landeg Jones <jamie <at> dyslexicfish.net>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Cc: jamie <at> dyslexicfish.net
Subject: Error in 'diff3' man page
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:41:45 +0000

-- (This was originally posted to bug-gnu-utils as described here:
--
-- https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Bugs.html
--
-- )

Most obsessive/pedantic/picky PR of the year goes to me, with:

The man page for diff3(1) refers to 'info diff' instead of
'info diff3'

>> How-To-Repeat:

% man diff3

Compare the similarity of the end of this page with the end of the
'man diff' page.

Both refer to 'info diff' for more information, but if you compare
the results of 'info diff' and 'info diff3' you'll clearly see that
the man page for diff3 should be referencing 'info diff3'.

Cheers, Jamie

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Jamie Landeg Jones <jamie <at> dyslexicfish.net>
Cc: 16228-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16228: Error in 'diff3' man page
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:43:14 -0800

tags 16228 notabug
close 16228
thanks

As I mentioned on bug-gnu-utils, this appears not to be a problem
when using a recent upstream release.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.