GNU bug report logs - #15995
24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 23:22:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: bug#15995: closed (Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill':
 emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:45:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 15995 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
15995: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15995
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 15995-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50;
 doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately
 precede the next kill
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800
Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
>
> I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
> guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
> do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
> effect.

Fixed in trunk, thanks.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must
 immediately precede the next kill
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST)
See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.

I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 rgm <at> gnu.org-20131128203155-qjc1xsp19z2k64b2
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'



This bug report was last modified 11 years and 157 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.