GNU bug report logs - #15995
24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 23:22:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 24.3.50

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 15995 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 15995 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#15995; Package emacs. (Thu, 28 Nov 2013 23:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 28 Nov 2013 23:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must
 immediately precede the next kill
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST)

See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.

I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 rgm <at> gnu.org-20131128203155-qjc1xsp19z2k64b2
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'
Reply sent to Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:45:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 15995-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 15995-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50;
 doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately
 precede the next kill
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800

Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
>
> I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
> guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
> do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
> effect.

Fixed in trunk, thanks.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 157 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.