GNU bug report logs - #15995
24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#15995: closed (24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize
 that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:45:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800
with message-id <87fvpqg9ou.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15995,
regarding 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
15995: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15995
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must
 immediately precede the next kill
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST)

See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.

I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 rgm <at> gnu.org-20131128203155-qjc1xsp19z2k64b2
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 15995-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50;
 doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately
 precede the next kill
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800

Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
>
> I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
> guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
> do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
> effect.

Fixed in trunk, thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.