GNU bug report logs - #14679
24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 14679 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 14679 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:29:56 -0700 (PDT)

Backtrace:
0x011ecbc8
0x011ecc3a
0x010e85a4
0x010e85bc
0x01203ee0
0x01203f60
0x01014115
0x010382e4
0x0118f329
0x01191641
0x010dd68a
0x010dd441
0x0116b0ec
0x010dd76a
0x0116ac19
0x010dd722
0x010dceb9
0x010dd075
0x010db363
0x010010f9
0x771133a6
0x776f9eee
0x776f9ec1




In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2013-06-18 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 113050 handa <at> gnu.org-20130618145521-fvpc5viqtc85j4j4
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --prefix=/c/usr --enable-checking CFLAGS='-O0 -g3'
 CPPFLAGS='-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1 -I/c/usr/include''

Message #8 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:55:41 +0200

I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, but this is the translation I get:

$ addr2line -e /path/to/emacs.exe < /path/to/backtrace
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0
??:0


--
Dani Moncayo

Message #11 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:58:15 +0200

> I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, but this is the translation I get:

Are you using addr2line from MinGW gcc 4.7.2? If so, try with the one
from 4.7.0.

Message #14 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:41:22 +0200

> Are you using addr2line from MinGW gcc 4.7.2?

Yes:
  $ gcc --version
  gcc.exe (GCC) 4.7.2

  $ addr2line --version
  GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.23.1

> If so, try with the one from 4.7.0.

Ok, I've downloaded the package "binutils-2.22" from the MinGW site,
and with that version it seems to work.

But then, it is broken the 2.23.1 version or what?

Anyway, this is the translation I get with version 2.22:

  $ ./addr2line -e /path/to/emacs.exe < /path/to/backtrace
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7741
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7773
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7121
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7132
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32term.c:5926
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32term.c:5948
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/frame.c:1777
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/xdisp.c:10180
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/print.c:472
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/print.c:852
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1116
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1052
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/eval.c:1279
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1164
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/eval.c:1063
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1143
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:776
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:840
  c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/emacs.c:1550
  crt1.c:0
  ??:0
  ??:0
  ??:0

--
Dani Moncayo

Message #17 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:20:32 +0200

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> But then, it is broken the 2.23.1 version or what?

Apparently.

> Anyway, this is the translation I get with version 2.22:
>
>   $ ./addr2line -e /path/to/emacs.exe < /path/to/backtrace
>   c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7741

I'd suggest passing -psf to addr2line.

Message #20 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:47:18 +0200

>> But then, it is broken the 2.23.1 version or what?
>
> Apparently.

I guess/hope the MinGW developers are already aware of that.

>> Anyway, this is the translation I get with version 2.22:
>>
>>   $ ./addr2line -e /path/to/emacs.exe < /path/to/backtrace
>>   c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7741
>
> I'd suggest passing -psf to addr2line.

Good idea, thank you.

--
Dani Moncayo

Message #23 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:52:57 +0300

> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:58:15 +0200
> Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, but this is the translation I get:
> 
> Are you using addr2line from MinGW gcc 4.7.2? If so, try with the one
> from 4.7.0.

addr2line is part of Binutils, not of GCC.

Message #26 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Cc: lekktu <at> gmail.com, 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:53:32 +0300

> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:41:22 +0200
> From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
>   $ addr2line --version
>   GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils) 2.23.1
> 
> > If so, try with the one from 4.7.0.
> 
> Ok, I've downloaded the package "binutils-2.22" from the MinGW site,
> and with that version it seems to work.
> 
> But then, it is broken the 2.23.1 version or what?

Yes, it's completely broken.  It's a known bug.

Message #31 received at 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 14679 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo Melgar <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14679: 24.3.50; emacs_bactrace.txt
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:56:18 +0200

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> addr2line is part of Binutils, not of GCC.

Yes, sorry.

I usually do not update packages individually, but as a whole when a
new GCC version is released. Hence my sloppy wording.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.