GNU bug report logs - #14205
24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 14205 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 14205 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:24:20 -0700

Backtrace:
0x01159601
0x01159673
0x01001459
0x01021A5E
0x0114F38D
0x7E418730
0x7E418812
0x7E4189C9
0x7E418A0C
0x0114DC15
0x0114DEB4
0x7C80B725 

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2013-04-09 on ODIEONE
Bzr revision: 112253 rgm <at> gnu.org-20130409101736-f1vzgrwt88suqqis
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
 -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib'
 

Message #8 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:37:15 +0200

??
??:0
w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7685
emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7717
terminate_due_to_signal at emacs.c:343
die at alloc.c:6522
w32_wnd_proc at w32fns.c:3133
??
??:0
??
??:0
??
??:0
??
??:0
w32_msg_pump at w32fns.c:2454
w32_msg_worker <at> 4 at w32fns.c:2580
??
??:0

Message #11 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:53:53 +0300

> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:37:15 +0200
> Cc: 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> ??
> ??:0
> w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7685
> emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7717
> terminate_due_to_signal at emacs.c:343
> die at alloc.c:6522
> w32_wnd_proc at w32fns.c:3133

The trap caught the beast!

This bug is a duplicate of #14062; I will reply there.

Thanks.

Message #18 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>, "'Juanma Barranquero'" <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:34:52 -0700

> > w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7685
> > emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7717
> > terminate_due_to_signal at emacs.c:343
> > die at alloc.c:6522
> > w32_wnd_proc at w32fns.c:3133
> 
> The trap caught the beast!

Glad to see something good come from reporting such a backtrace.
Thanks for looking into it, both of you.

I've downloaded Juanma's new Windows binary.  Will let you know if I get another
crash with backtrace.

Message #21 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:48:16 +0200

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> wrote:

> I've downloaded Juanma's new Windows binary.  Will let you know if I get another
> crash with backtrace.

If you get a new backtrace, please send it to bug#14062's thread.

Message #24 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Juanma Barranquero'" <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:34:37 -0700

> If you get a new backtrace, please send it to bug#14062's thread.

OK, I'll try to remember that.

But what if I get a backtrace that is from something different?  I won't know
the difference.

Wouldn't you prefer that I file a new bug, and then, if you determine that it is
the same thing, we merge it?  That's the usual procedure.

Message #27 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:08:43 +0200

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't you prefer that I file a new bug, and then, if you determine that it is
> the same thing, we merge it?  That's the usual procedure.

A new bug report can be created afterwards, if needed.

Message #30 received at 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: lekktu <at> gmail.com, 14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14205: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:50:06 +0300

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>, <14205 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:34:37 -0700
> 
> > If you get a new backtrace, please send it to bug#14062's thread.
> 
> OK, I'll try to remember that.
> 
> But what if I get a backtrace that is from something different?  I won't know
> the difference.

If the backtrace is _very_ different, like much-much longer, then
report a new bug.  Otherwise, it is best to report to 14062.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.