GNU bug report logs -
#1305
All code that currently beeps should use visual bell instead
Previous Next
Full log
Message #760 received at 1305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
>> So we'd change the default of the former to be a new visible bell
>> function (for instance something that works the same as the visible
>> bell on GNU/Linux systems, but across all systems (or one of the new
>> proposed visible bell functions)), and deprecate `visible-bell'. I
>> think that should be a pretty un-annoying way forward.
>
> Fully agreed; it's an improvement over my proposal.
>
> This is currently handled in different ways on different platforms, so I
> we might want to clean that up a bit while we're at it.
>
Yes, the idea would be to have new predefined values for
ring-bell-function:
ring-bell-beep = the former visible-bell nil (when ring-bell-function was
nil)
ring-bell-visible = the former visible-bell t (when ring-bell-function was
nil), whose behavior differs depending on the platform
and a new prettier bell function, which would be the default.
>
> The main thing remaining, besides writing the actual patch, is to decide
> what the visual bell should look like. I am currently running with
> Gregory's patch for testing; it would useful if others carried out
> similar experiments with one or more variations mentioned in this thread
>
Thank you. I recently improved the patch to handle the explicit 'ding'
events more cleanly, see attached. In that case, because 'ding' is
usually followed by 'message', there is a short delay between the flash
and the message, but that seems unavoidable (or at least I do not see how
it could be avoided). Note that the delay is already present with
visible-bell t (and ring-bell-function nil).
[New-default-bell.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 153 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.