GNU bug report logs - #12689
24.2; Eshell ${cmd} substitution

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Aidan Gauland <aidalgol <at> no8wireless.co.nz>

Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:09:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.2

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: John Wiegley <johnw <at> newartisans.com>
To: Samer Masterson <samer <at> samertm.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 12689 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#12689: 24.2; Eshell ${cmd} substitution
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 23:19:42 -0500
>>>>> Samer Masterson <samer <at> samertm.com> writes:

> So I need to figure out a couple things in order to unblock myself: - how
> eshell knows to wait for other external processes (excluding
> eshell-wait-for-process), and whether that can be used at command-level
> granularity. E.g. for "cmd ${ext_cmd0} | ext_cmd1", the entire process needs
> to wait for both sides of the pipe to finish, and "cmd" needs to wait for
> "ext_cmd0" to finish before executing). "cmd ${ext_cmd0}" also shouldn't
> lock Emacs. - where the entry point is for the command prompt, and how the
> command prompt is reset after a set of commands finishes.

> I've cc'd johnw because he might know the answer to the above questions, and
> what the correct approach to fixing this should be. I'll return to this when
> I've learned more about how eshell works.

I don't really know the answer anymore (Eshell is 16 years old now!), but I'm
wondering what the rationale is for making this change?  Anything that messes
with the way sub-processes are handled should be treated with extreme care.

John




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 42 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.