GNU bug report logs - #12492
24.2.50; Open vc-dir buffer easier and faster

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:06:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 24.2.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 12492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: bug#12492: Acknowledgement (24.2.50; Open vc-dir buffer easier and faster)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 23:57:11 +0200
On 13.03.2020 16:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: 12492 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, juri <at> linkov.net
>> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
>> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:23:51 +0200
>>
>>> How can we describe such an extension in advance in the user manual?
>>
>> Maybe by using a higher-level language like I suggested earlier in this
>> discussions.
> 
> That'd be some vague general principle, not a documentation of
> specific commands.

Surely you're not going to say that e.g. project-find-file calls 'git 
ls-files' to enumerate a project's files in the most usual case, or that 
project-find-regexp uses Grep under the hood?

Keeping a certain level of abstraction is a good thing.

>> Projects are this and that, you can use commands xx and yy whn inside a
>> project. If the current buffer does not belong to a project, you will be
>> prompted for a directory to look in. The main project type supported by
>> Emacs OOB is VC repositories.
> 
> Sorry, not in my book.  This text begs gobs of questions for which
> there will be no answers.  User manuals shouldn't do that.

Could you give an example of a couple of such questions?

>> How do we document completion-at-point, for instance? It's also
>> extensible.
> 
> We describe the available variants.  Please take a look at the
> relevant text (in "Symbol Completion" and in "Shell Mode").

So it says that completion-at-point is "flexible", and that's basically 
it on the subject of extensibility (IOW, the possibility of different 
behaviors in different major modes)?




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 58 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.