GNU bug report logs - #11987
use of -h and -V

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11987: closed (use of -h and -V)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:08:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:01:40 -0600
with message-id <50080534.9050001 <at> redhat.com>
and subject line Re: bug#11987: peace and happiness will spread more widely once coreutils...
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11987,
regarding use of -h and -V
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
11987: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11987
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marcel Partap <mpartap <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: peace and happiness will spread more widely once coreutils...
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:35:32 +0200

..more thoroughly supports the short options -h and -V for --help and
--version respectively.
Or are there convincing arguments in favor of f.e. *date -h* telling
people to try harder asking for help?
> date: invalid option -- 'h'
> Try `date --help' for more information.
#Regards!Marcel C;

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Marcel Partap <mpartap <at> gmx.net>
Cc: 11987-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11987: peace and happiness will spread more widely once
	coreutils...
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:01:40 -0600

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

retitle 11987 use of -h and -V
tag notabug
thanks

On 07/19/2012 06:35 AM, Marcel Partap wrote:
> ..more thoroughly supports the short options -h and -V for --help and
> --version respectively.

GNU Coding Standards require '--help' and '--version', but do not
require -h or -V (in fact, is -v or -V the more common abbreviation?).
We'd rather not burn short option letters on these, since we risk
collisions with future standardized uses of those short options for
other reasons.

> Or are there convincing arguments in favor of f.e. *date -h* telling
> people to try harder asking for help?
>> date: invalid option -- 'h'
>> Try `date --help' for more information.

Yes, there is a convincing argument - future POSIX may standardize 'date
-h' to mean something else, and we don't want to get in the way of that
potential addition.

I'm going to close this bug out, but you can feel free to continue to
add arguments if you think you can be convincing enough to change our minds.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.