GNU bug report logs - #1163
23.0.60; With SVN, vc-annotate doesn't display the date for each line

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz>

Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:35:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Merged with 5427

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 1163 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#1163; Package emacs. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz>
To: emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-annotate doesn't display the date for each line
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:48 +1300
With SVN, vc-annotate just displays the revision number for each line.
With CVS, it also displays the date that the line was last changed, which
can be useful to know.  The date is output from "svn annotate" when the
option "-v" is used.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob




Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#1163; Package emacs. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 1163 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz>
Cc: 1163 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1163: 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-annotate doesn't display the date for each line
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:08:32 -0400
Nick Roberts wrote:

> With SVN, vc-annotate just displays the revision number for each line.

This was also the case in Emacs 22, so I suggest this is a wishlist
item that does not need to be fixed for 23.1.

> With CVS, it also displays the date that the line was last changed, which
> can be useful to know.  The date is output from "svn annotate" when the
> option "-v" is used.




Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' Request was from Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:10:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `emacs,vc'. Request was from Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug reassigned from package 'emacs,vc' to 'emacs'. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Merged 1163 5427. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:26:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#1163; Package emacs. (Thu, 05 May 2022 11:57:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 1163 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz>
Cc: 5427 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 1163 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#5427: vc-annotate inconsistent output format
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 13:56:45 +0200
Nick Roberts <nickrob <at> snap.net.nz> writes:

> With SVN, vc-annotate just displays the revision number for each line.
> With CVS, it also displays the date that the line was last changed, which
> can be useful to know.  The date is output from "svn annotate" when the
> option "-v" is used.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)

This is still the case in Emacs 29, but since basically git won, it'll
probably take an SVN enthusiast to get this fixed.

Adding -v indeed gives the time:

     1      larsi 2022-05-05 13:46:34 +0200 (Thu, 05 May 2022) This is foo.
     2      larsi 2022-05-05 13:46:41 +0200 (Thu, 05 May 2022) Yes.

But that's too massive to display, so vc-svn-annotate-command would have
to implement a filter to reformat that in a more sensible way.  It
shouldn't be a lot of work -- the person implementing this could look
at, say, vc-cvs-annotate-command as a model for how to write the filter.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 39 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.