GNU bug report logs - #10490
define-module documentation confusion

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10490: closed (define-module documentation confusion)
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:04 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:11:25 +0100
with message-id <87ipjokw82.fsf <at> pobox.com>
and subject line Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10490,
regarding define-module documentation confusion
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
10490: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10490
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: define-module documentation confusion
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:09:43 -0800

According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
the form (hierarchy file).

However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10490-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:11:25 +0100

On Thu 12 Jan 2012 21:09, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com> writes:

> According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
> the form (hierarchy file).
>
> However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).

I think I fixed this for the 2.0.4 release.  Let me know if it's still
there.

Thanks!

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.