GNU bug report logs - #10490
define-module documentation confusion

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 10490 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 10490 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#10490; Package guile. (Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:31:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: define-module documentation confusion
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:09:43 -0800

According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
the form (hierarchy file).

However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).
Reply sent to Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 10490-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10490-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:11:25 +0100

On Thu 12 Jan 2012 21:09, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com> writes:

> According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
> the form (hierarchy file).
>
> However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).

I think I fixed this for the 2.0.4 release.  Let me know if it's still
there.

Thanks!

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Message #11 received at 10490-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <aconchillo <at> gmail.com>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: 10490-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:37:09 -0800

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> wrote:
>
> I think I fixed this for the 2.0.4 release.  Let me know if it's still
> there.
>

Yes! It's clear now: module-name is a list of one or more symbols.

Thanks!
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:24:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 114 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.