GNU bug report logs - #10013
[ls] document origin of name

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Ian Bruntlett <ianbruntlett <at> hotmail.com>

Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch, wontfix

Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ian Bruntlett <ianbruntlett <at> hotmail.com>
To: <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Subject: man ls
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:22:45 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

I was berating an AT&Ter at an ACCU conference a long time ago. I said that "ls" was an example of Unix's unhelpfulness. When he told me that "ls" was short for "list sorted", I remembered it to this day.

Had a look at your man page for ls - it states:-

List  information  about  the FILEs (the current directory by default).
       Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort.

Do you think it would be a worthwhile thing to let people know directly that ls is short for "list sorted"?

TTFN,


Ian

-- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org/  		 	   		  
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 231 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.