From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 05 23:43:49 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 03:43:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMte8-0001FM-LA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:43:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMte3-0001F7-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:43:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbO-0002ld-Ul for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:34789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbO-0002lY-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbN-0006Ey-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbL-0002lF-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:43773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbL-0002lB-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtbL-000758-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 From: Dan Nicolaescu To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) ./temacs -Q -nw aborts in bidi_initialize It used to work a few months ago. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x0000003c994355b7 in kill () from /lib64/libc.so.6 Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.14-5.x86_64 ncurses-libs-5.8-2.20110319.fc15.x86_64 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000003c994355b7 in kill () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00000000004bd1d6 in abort () at /tmp/trunk/src/emacs.c:386 #2 0x00000000004a5344 in bidi_initialize () at /tmp/trunk/src/bidi.c:758 #3 0x00000000004a54c5 in bidi_init_it (charpos=0x0, bytepos=0x0, frame_window_p=0x0, bidi_it=0x7fffffffd308) at /tmp/trunk/src/bidi.c:802 #4 0x0000000000425624 in reseat_to_string (it=0x7fffffffc960, s=0xb6dc00 '-' ..., string=0xb53a12, charpos=0x0, precision=0x0, field_width=0x0, multibyte=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:6190 #5 0x0000000000448981 in display_string (string=0xb6dc00 '-' ..., lisp_string=0xb53a12, face_string=0x825d01, face_string_pos=0x1, start=0x0, it=0x7fffffffc960, field_width=0x0, precision=0x0, max_x=0x0, multibyte=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:21330 #6 0x000000000044569c in display_mode_element (it=0x7fffffffc960, depth=0x1, field_width=0x0, precision=0x0, elt=0x825d01, props=0xb53a12, risky=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:20102 #7 0x0000000000444ab8 in display_mode_line (w=0xb696d0, face_id=MODE_LINE_FACE_ID, format=0x825d01) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:19791 #8 0x000000000044481e in display_mode_lines (w=0xb696d0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:19733 #9 0x00000000004445f1 in redisplay_mode_lines (window=0xb696d5, force=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:19692 #10 0x0000000000430e32 in echo_area_display (update_frame_p=0x1) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:10534 #11 0x000000000042e91d in message3_nolog (m=0xb69001, nbytes=0x1d, multibyte=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:9436 #12 0x000000000042e62e in message3 (m=0xb69001, nbytes=0x1d, multibyte=0x0) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:9373 #13 0x000000000042ec3e in message_with_string (m=0x5fab95 "Loading %s (source)...", string=0xba5371, log=0x1) at /tmp/trunk/src/xdisp.c:9517 #14 0x0000000000587013 in Fload (file=0xba5371, noerror=0xb53a12, nomessage=0xb53a12, nosuffix=0xb53a12, must_suffix=0xb53a12) at /tmp/trunk/src/lread.c:1295 #15 0x000000000055c865 in eval_sub (form=0xb75426) at /tmp/trunk/src/eval.c:2336 #16 0x000000000055c0e8 in Feval (form=0xb75426, lexical=0xb53a12) at /tmp/trunk/src/eval.c:2176 #17 0x00000000004c1462 in top_level_2 () at /tmp/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1167 #18 0x000000000055aac4 in internal_condition_case (bfun=0x4c1445 , handlers=0xb604e2, hfun=0x4c1030 ) at /tmp/trunk/src/eval.c:1499 #19 0x00000000004c149c in top_level_1 (ignore=0xb53a12) at /tmp/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1175 #20 0x000000000055a44e in internal_catch (tag=0xb5f442, func=0x4c1464 , arg=0xb53a12) at /tmp/trunk/src/eval.c:1256 #21 0x00000000004c13c0 in command_loop () at /tmp/trunk/src/keyboard.c:1130 #22 0x00000000004c0b74 in recursive_edit_1 () at /tmp/trunk/src/keyboard.c:757 #23 0x00000000004c0d17 in Frecursive_edit () at /tmp/trunk/src/keyboard.c:821 #24 0x00000000004bede6 in main (argc=0x3, argv=0x7fffffffe4c8) at /tmp/trunk/src/emacs.c:1707 Lisp Backtrace: "load" (0xffffdb90) (gdb) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 00:05:59 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 04:05:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtza-0001vI-AN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:05:58 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMtzV-0001v6-Td for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:05:55 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LU800B000DDEQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:03:08 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LU800BWY0L76Q60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:03:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:01:05 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dan Nicolaescu Message-id: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 > > ./temacs -Q -nw > aborts in bidi_initialize > > It used to work a few months ago. Yes, but the way bidi properties of characters are accessed has changed since then. This abort means you somehow have a problem loading uni-bidi.el, or didn't load it at all, or perhaps load a wrong uni-bidi.el (e.g., from Emacs 23). It is strange that it works without -nw, though. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 00:50:50 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 04:50:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMugz-0003PN-SW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:50:50 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMugx-0003PE-Bm for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:50:48 -0400 Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMueI-0005Lq-Va; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:48:02 -0400 From: Dan Nicolaescu To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:48:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:01:05 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Dan Nicolaescu >> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 >> >> ./temacs -Q -nw >> aborts in bidi_initialize >> >> It used to work a few months ago. > > Yes, but the way bidi properties of characters are accessed has > changed since then. > > This abort means you somehow have a problem loading uni-bidi.el, or > didn't load it at all, or perhaps load a wrong uni-bidi.el (e.g., from > Emacs 23). It is strange that it works without -nw, though. It looks this happens when printing the first "Loading" message at startup to load loadup.el. Is uni-bidi.el loaded before that? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 02:27:31 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 07:27:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMx8c-0008Eg-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:27:30 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMx8a-0008EX-2a for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:27:28 -0500 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMx5v-00072T-6r; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:24:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:24:43 -0500 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dan Nicolaescu In-reply-to: (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:48:02 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 00:48:02 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Dan Nicolaescu > >> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:40:55 -0400 > >> > >> ./temacs -Q -nw > >> aborts in bidi_initialize > >> > >> It used to work a few months ago. > > > > Yes, but the way bidi properties of characters are accessed has > > changed since then. > > > > This abort means you somehow have a problem loading uni-bidi.el, or > > didn't load it at all, or perhaps load a wrong uni-bidi.el (e.g., from > > Emacs 23). It is strange that it works without -nw, though. > > It looks this happens when printing the first "Loading" message at > startup to load loadup.el. That figures: Emacs needs uni-bidi for display, and `message' enters redisplay. > Is uni-bidi.el loaded before that? Evidently, it isn't. I think it is pulled in when charprop is loaded, but that's half-way down loadup.el. We need to find a way of loading uni-bidi and uni-mirrored before loading loadup.el. I will get to that later today, if no one beats me to it. And I still wonder how come this works in a GUI session. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 04:50:09 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 09:50:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMzMd-0004C3-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:50:08 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMzMZ-0004Br-PV for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 04:50:04 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98151186DEC6; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:48:43 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: TQYesu0olxDu1n1GBrRVQAxmu7VAHq2aUetlxcFcbDI= Received: from linux.local (ppp-93-104-146-255.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.146.255]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6C651C0014B; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:47:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1F6F61E535C; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:47:14 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Yow: Yow! We're going to a new disco! Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 10:47:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:24:43 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Eli Zaretskii writes: > And I still wonder how come this works in a GUI session. That doesn't create a real frame until after loadup is loaded. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 05:11:36 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 10:11:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMzhP-0004nW-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:11:36 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMzhN-0004nM-4C for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:11:34 -0500 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMzeg-0003AA-I9; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:08:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 05:08:46 -0500 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 06 Nov 2011 10:47:13 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: dann@gnu.org, 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 9963@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 10:47:13 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > And I still wonder how come this works in a GUI session. > > That doesn't create a real frame until after loadup is loaded. Thanks, this unlocks what was a mystery in my eyes. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 13:34:02 2011 Received: (at 9963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 18:34:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RN7Xe-0003Um-7S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:34:02 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RN7Xc-0003UV-0p for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:34:01 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LU900L004OIRL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9963@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:30:56 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LU900LM84RJME30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:30:56 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:28:53 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: dann@gnu.org Message-id: <831utljeai.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963 Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:24:43 -0500 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > This abort means you somehow have a problem loading uni-bidi.el, or > > > didn't load it at all, or perhaps load a wrong uni-bidi.el (e.g., from > > > Emacs 23). It is strange that it works without -nw, though. > > > > It looks this happens when printing the first "Loading" message at > > startup to load loadup.el. > > That figures: Emacs needs uni-bidi for display, and `message' enters > redisplay. > > > Is uni-bidi.el loaded before that? > > Evidently, it isn't. I think it is pulled in when charprop is loaded, > but that's half-way down loadup.el. > > We need to find a way of loading uni-bidi and uni-mirrored before > loading loadup.el. I will get to that later today, if no one beats me > to it. I think I fixed this (revision 106305 on the trunk), please check. For the record: I decided that loading uni-bidi in advance is not a good idea, as proper functioning of character property tables needed by bidi.c depends on many other *.el files that are normally loaded before uni-bidi. There be dragons there. So instead, I disabled bidi reordering for as long as purify-flag is non-nil; I hope this is TRT for all supported configurations, including CANNOT_DUMP. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 06 18:13:14 2011 Received: (at 9963-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2011 23:13:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBtq-00020M-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:13:14 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBto-00020F-EV for 9963-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:13:13 -0500 Received: from dann by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNBr5-00078j-GX; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:10:23 -0500 From: Dan Nicolaescu To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9963: ./temacs -Q -nw abort in bidi_initialize References: <837h3dkigu.fsf@gnu.org> <831utljeai.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:10:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <831utljeai.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:28:53 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9963-done Cc: 9963-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 02:24:43 -0500 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: 9963@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > > This abort means you somehow have a problem loading uni-bidi.el, or >> > > didn't load it at all, or perhaps load a wrong uni-bidi.el (e.g., from >> > > Emacs 23). It is strange that it works without -nw, though. >> > >> > It looks this happens when printing the first "Loading" message at >> > startup to load loadup.el. >> >> That figures: Emacs needs uni-bidi for display, and `message' enters >> redisplay. >> >> > Is uni-bidi.el loaded before that? >> >> Evidently, it isn't. I think it is pulled in when charprop is loaded, >> but that's half-way down loadup.el. >> >> We need to find a way of loading uni-bidi and uni-mirrored before >> loading loadup.el. I will get to that later today, if no one beats me >> to it. > > I think I fixed this (revision 106305 on the trunk), please check. Thanks for the quick fix, it looks like everything works fine. > For the record: I decided that loading uni-bidi in advance is not a > good idea, as proper functioning of character property tables needed > by bidi.c depends on many other *.el files that are normally loaded > before uni-bidi. There be dragons there. So instead, I disabled bidi > reordering for as long as purify-flag is non-nil; I hope this is TRT > for all supported configurations, including CANNOT_DUMP. Agreed. From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator