GNU bug report logs -
#9939
Problems with the SIZE description in man pages for <ls> and <du>
Previous Next
Reported by: abdallah clark <clark-adc <at> clear.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:16:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #47 received at 9939 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 11/10/2011 01:07 PM, abdallah clark wrote:
> Gentlemen:
>
> That was already done, to no avail. Has anyone actually looked at that
> paragraph on SIZE and thought about what it means?
[Please don't top-post on technical lists.]
The paragraph in question:
SIZE may be (or may be an integer optionally followed by) one of following:
KB 1000, K 1024, MB 1000*1000, M 1024*1024, and so on for G, T, P, E, Z, Y.
That first sentence means there are three valid forms:
SIZE may be one of the following (suffix-only case)
SIZE may be an integer (size-only case)
SIZE may be an integer followed by one of the following
(size-and-suffix-case)
Next are the possible suffixes:
KB is a suffix for 1000 (kilobytes)
K is a suffix for 1024 (kibibytes)
not listed: KiB is a synonym for K (the info pages list this, but as the
--help output tries to be terse, we skip the longer spelling here)
MB is a suffix for 1000*1000 (megabytes)
M is a suffix for 1024*1024 (mebibytes)
again, not listed is MiB as a synonym for M
And so on means that:
GB is a suffix for 1000*1000*1000 (gigabytes)
G and GiB are a suffix for 1024*1024*1024 (GiB)
Or in a rough BNF form,
SIZE : integer [SUFFIX]
| SUFFIX
SUFFIX : LETTER /* in powers of 1024 */
| LETTER 'B' /* in powers of 1000 */
| LETTER 'i' 'B' /* in powers of 1024 */
LETTER : 'K' /* base ^ 1, for 1024 or 1000 */
| 'M' /* base ^ 2, for 1024*1024 or 1000*1000 */
| 'G' /* base ^ 3 */
| 'T' /* base ^ 4 */
| 'P' /* base ^ 5 */
| 'E' /* base ^ 6 */
| 'Z' /* base ^ 7 */
| 'Y' /* base ^ 8 */
(and if you have a disk larger than 1Y, I'm jealous)
I followed that fairly easily, but I've also read the code that
implements it, so I'm unfortunately biased. I'm not sure where you are
having difficulties following it, which is why we're asking that you
provide an alternative wording, at which point we can evaluate the two
wordings and pick the strongest of both approaches.
--
Eric Blake eblake <at> redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 275 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.