From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 16:49:12 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2011 20:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLGh-0001rf-UQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:49:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLGf-0001rX-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:49:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLEP-0002gT-Sb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:46:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:36418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLEP-0002gP-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:46:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLEO-0002O2-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:46:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLEN-0002g5-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:46:48 -0400 Received: from pobox.sfu.ca ([142.58.101.28]:62757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLLEN-0002fk-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:46:47 -0400 Received: from fraser.sfu.ca (fraser.sfu.ca [142.58.101.25]) by pobox.sfu.ca (8.13.6/8.13.5/SFU-6.0G) with ESMTP id pA1Kkh6H010053 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kurn@localhost) by fraser.sfu.ca (8.13.8+Sun/8.14.3/SFU-6.0C) id pA1KkggS010335 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:46:42 -0700 From: Andrew Kurn To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: kill-line problem Message-ID: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) I'm getting a problem using kill-line in a buffer with much invisible text. Instead of killing one line, it kills on and on til the end of the buffer. Version is 21.2.1. kill-whole-line = t emacs -nw (I have found other bugs persisting in this less popular use of emacs.) I know you will ask me to reproduce the bug in the latest version of emacs, but I don't want to get side-tracked right now, and I figure that a preliminary bug-report is better than none at all. Has anyone seen this one before? Worked on it? Thanks and keep up the good work. Andrew From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 21:22:04 2011 Received: (at 9936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2011 01:22:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLPWl-00087Z-Uq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:22:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLPWk-00087S-3n for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:22:02 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLPUS-0007MU-Fe; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:19:40 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Andrew Kurn Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> X-Spook: SEAL Team 6 spies Lexis-Nexis Fedayeen TELINT enemy of X-Ran: xRZ(WE,/5T0P!VNjpH.vyh-h-ce+[aTRipL\%L>QRfJ}R1-M_n'Sq;6[#!5R^nHaZ4|jg! X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:19:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> (Andrew Kurn's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:46:42 -0700") Message-ID: <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936 Cc: 9936@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Andrew Kurn wrote: > I'm getting a problem using kill-line in a buffer with much invisible text. > Instead of killing one line, it kills on and on til the end of the buffer. > > Version is 21.2.1. > kill-whole-line = t It sounds like the intended behaviour. With kill-whole-line non-nil, kill-line kills up to wherever forward-visible-line ends up. Ie, invisible newlines are ignored. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 02 13:37:29 2011 Received: (at 9936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2011 17:37:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLeki-0006NO-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:37:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLekf-0006NG-Lq for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:37:26 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLeiL-00080U-3v for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:35:01 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20145.32580.991037.973659@fencepost.gnu.org> Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:35:00 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: 9936@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes Bcc: rgm@gnu.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 142.58.101.28 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0700 From: Andrew Kurn To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem X-Bogosity: no, spamicity=0.067708, v1.2.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:37:28 -0400 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) On Tue 1 Nov 2011 21:19 -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Andrew Kurn wrote: > > > I'm getting a problem using kill-line in a buffer with much invisible text. > > Instead of killing one line, it kills on and on til the end of the buffer. > > > > Version is 21.2.1. > > kill-whole-line = t > > It sounds like the intended behaviour. With kill-whole-line non-nil, > kill-line kills up to wherever forward-visible-line ends up. Ie, > invisible newlines are ignored. No, sorry, but there are several visible newlines in the way. It eats them all up. A PS. Thanks for writing. It's always a surprise to hear from a human. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 02 16:14:00 2011 Received: (at 9936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2011 20:14:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLhCC-0001SK-Fm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:14:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLhCA-0001SD-DF for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:13:59 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLh9m-0001BW-G6; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:11:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20145.41970.282049.500375@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:11:30 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Andrew Kurn Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem In-Reply-To: <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: white X-Ran: D-Lkeu3ANcCJ.>[FKy.JI231mY3uIBM'[k$Oq%-E0\PVc7bY'-B{d9zIEghbevPfv` X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936 Cc: 9936@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) (Please keep 9936@debbugs cc'd) Andrew Kurn wrote (on Wed, 2 Nov 2011 at 09:50 -0700): > > It sounds like the intended behaviour. With kill-whole-line non-nil, > > kill-line kills up to wherever forward-visible-line ends up. Ie, > > invisible newlines are ignored. > > No, sorry, but there are several visible newlines in the way. It eats > them all up. Can you give a recipe showing how to reproduce the problem, starting from emacs -q --no-site-file? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 02 18:15:21 2011 Received: (at 9936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2011 22:15:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLj5d-0004A4-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:15:21 -0400 Received: from pobox.sfu.ca ([142.58.101.28]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLj5Z-00049u-Rq for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:15:19 -0400 Received: from fraser.sfu.ca (fraser.sfu.ca [142.58.101.25]) by pobox.sfu.ca (8.13.6/8.13.5/SFU-6.0G) with ESMTP id pA2MCoAp003137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kurn@localhost) by fraser.sfu.ca (8.13.8+Sun/8.14.3/SFU-6.0C) id pA2MCoNh028166; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:12:50 -0700 From: Andrew Kurn To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem Message-ID: <20111102221250.GA20214@sfu.ca> References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> <20145.41970.282049.500375@fencepost.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20145.41970.282049.500375@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936 Cc: kurn@sfu.ca, 9936@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) On Wed 2 Nov 2011 16:11 -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > > > (Please keep 9936@debbugs cc'd) > > Andrew Kurn wrote (on Wed, 2 Nov 2011 at 09:50 -0700): > > > > It sounds like the intended behaviour. With kill-whole-line non-nil, > > > kill-line kills up to wherever forward-visible-line ends up. Ie, > > > invisible newlines are ignored. > > > > No, sorry, but there are several visible newlines in the way. It eats > > them all up. > > Can you give a recipe showing how to reproduce the problem, starting > from emacs -q --no-site-file? This seems to work: emacs -nw -q --no-site-file (setq ss (concat (make-string 10 ?X) "," )) (put-text-property 0 10 'invisible t ss) (insert ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ) (setq kill-whole-line t) --- Then use ^K to kill the first line. They all disappear. (let ((kill-whole-line t)) (kill-line)) This seems to have the value "kill-region" . . . if that makes any sense. Andrew From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 03 20:07:58 2011 Received: (at 9936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2011 00:07:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM7KA-0007aZ-LG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:07:58 -0400 Received: from smtprelay-h22.telenor.se ([195.54.99.197]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM7K8-0007aQ-2e for 9936@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:07:57 -0400 Received: from iph3.telenor.se (iph3.telenor.se [195.54.127.134]) by smtprelay-h22.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAC6D53E for <9936@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 01:05:23 +0100 (CET) X-SMTPAUTH-B2: [bocjoh] X-SENDER-IP: [85.228.192.203] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgdOAPQqs05V5MDLPGdsb2JhbABDiUGgRBkBAQEBNzKBcgEBBAFWIwULCxgJJQ8BBBgBDAoaE4gCArUjiR8EpX4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,453,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="143576784" Received: from c-cbc0e455.04-211-6c6b701.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO muon.localdomain) ([85.228.192.203]) by iph3.telenor.se with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2011 01:05:23 +0100 Received: by muon.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 508EE4843B8; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 01:05:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Johan_Bockg=C3=A5rd?= To: Andrew Kurn Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> <20145.41970.282049.500375@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102221250.GA20214@sfu.ca> Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:05:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20111102221250.GA20214@sfu.ca> (Andrew Kurn's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:12:50 -0700") Message-ID: <87wrbgah1a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936 Cc: Glenn Morris , 9936@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Andrew Kurn writes: > On Wed 2 Nov 2011 16:11 -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: >> >> >> (Please keep 9936@debbugs cc'd) >> >> Andrew Kurn wrote (on Wed, 2 Nov 2011 at 09:50 -0700): >> >> > > It sounds like the intended behaviour. With kill-whole-line non-nil, >> > > kill-line kills up to wherever forward-visible-line ends up. Ie, >> > > invisible newlines are ignored. >> > >> > No, sorry, but there are several visible newlines in the way. It eats >> > them all up. >> >> Can you give a recipe showing how to reproduce the problem, starting >> from emacs -q --no-site-file? > > > This seems to work: > > emacs -nw -q --no-site-file > > (setq ss (concat (make-string 10 ?X) "," )) > > > (put-text-property 0 10 'invisible t ss) > > > (insert ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ) > > > (setq kill-whole-line t) I can reproduce this bug in Emacs 21, but it appears to be fixed in Emacs 22 and later. (The problem was in forward-visible-line.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 03 20:58:35 2011 Received: (at 9936-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2011 00:58:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM878-0000Je-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:58:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM875-0000JW-NR for 9936-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:58:32 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RM84d-0001Qb-GH; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:55:59 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 9936-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#9936: kill-line problem References: <20111101204642.GC20741@sfu.ca> <5bbosvl3rn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102165024.GD26922@sfu.ca> <20145.41970.282049.500375@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111102221250.GA20214@sfu.ca> <87wrbgah1a.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: Israel doctrine Taiwan virus Guantanamo S Box espionage X-Ran: WY2Q")\JIf\O2Ho\OU_9^U~<-2heIZraM%?n_:E)Y;z?1^2GXlhu!)fwJc5k{Jkl=>5OC[ X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:55:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wrbgah1a.fsf@gnu.org> ("Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd=22's?= message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:05:21 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9936-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Version: 22.1 >> emacs -nw -q --no-site-file >> >> (setq ss (concat (make-string 10 ?X) "," )) >> >> >> (put-text-property 0 10 'invisible t ss) >> >> >> (insert ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ss ss ss "\n" ) >> >> >> (setq kill-whole-line t) > > I can reproduce this bug in Emacs 21, but it appears to be fixed in > Emacs 22 and later. (The problem was in forward-visible-line.) Yes, I also see it in 21.4, but not in 22.1 or 23.3, so I'm closing this as fixed in 22.1. Thanks for the bug recipe. You are encouraged to upgrade to a more recent Emacs! :) From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator