From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 24 16:43:48 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2011 20:43:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRN5-0004Cp-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:43:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRN4-0004Cd-1V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:43:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRLQ-0006I5-2o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:42:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:35114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRLP-0006Ht-Iq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:42:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRLC-00058l-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:41:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRKt-0006Cp-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:41:34 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:48528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIRKt-0006Cc-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:41:31 -0400 Received: by faat2 with SMTP id t2so79130faa.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:41:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C0CU2Ao4N5WXridZs0l2592FBM6DNJZUN+j0MSg+q44=; b=UDl75sjQqTYIVZynaj+h6ABlgIZtB1RLodMp0dV4TRkUW/a2ps7uWwjJI5IIRpPk12 hHIDx/G53NvUfL4koZfhJ4RgbiuTpPB9MVWzi9MjyXguqhluZyJnmOJKap6CSiFVMZuj i+H1b3/sZJx+r7HGmNBpm1fRCeum/ua7XGIUc= Received: by 10.223.91.143 with SMTP id n15mr40430523fam.23.1319488890442; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [46.202.219.73] (73-219-202-46.pool.ukrtel.net. [46.202.219.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n25sm33839919fah.15.2011.10.24.13.41.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA5CD72.1000301@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:41:22 +0300 From: Oleksandr Gavenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: nt/README and nt/README.w32 confuse. Why nt/README still live? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) I ask same question at: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/145481 Significant changes in nt/README dated: revno: 35870 committer: Andrew Innes timestamp: Sat 2001-02-03 18:23:30 +0000 message: Replace outdated information. Next significant thing done by: revno: 84027 [merge] committer: Miles Bader timestamp: Fri 2008-02-01 02:40:23 +0000 message: Merge from emacs--rel--22 But exactly same changes applied to nt/README.w32. ediff on nt/README.w32 and nt/README show that nt/README is mostly subset of nt/README.w32. So why nt/README still alive? I confused what to read and my little detective search told me that nt/README useless as duplicate and have no any other info then in nt/README.w32. I suggest remove this file (and move any missing to nt/README.w32) to follow SPOT rule. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 24 17:51:43 2011 Received: (at 9863-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2011 21:51:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RISQp-0005lw-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:43 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RISQm-0005lk-Vi for 9863-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:41 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTL00A00B6FAT00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 9863-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:50:01 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTL00A9EBBC9U30@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:50:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:50:07 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#9863: nt/README and nt/README.w32 confuse. Why nt/README still live? In-reply-to: <4EA5CD72.1000301@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Oleksandr Gavenko Message-id: <83obx6cb5c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4EA5CD72.1000301@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9863-done Cc: 9863-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:41:22 +0300 > From: Oleksandr Gavenko > > I ask same question at: > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/145481 See my response; closing. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 24 17:54:24 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2011 21:54:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RISTQ-0005qf-Gd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:54:24 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RISTO-0005qS-0Y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:54:22 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTL00A00AV1AA00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:52:42 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTL00AI7BFU5F60@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:52:42 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:52:48 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <83mxcqcb0v.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) tags 9861 notabug tags 9863 notabug stop From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:51:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator