GNU bug report logs -
#9862
23.3; [Gnus/EasyPG] Mixing PGP/MIME signature with RFC822 forwarded multipart message results in an invalid MIME message
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
"S=e9bastien Villemot" <sebastien.villemot <at> ens.fr> writes:
> This is Debian bug #608279 (http://bugs.debian.org/608279).
>
> If I try to send the following e-mail with Gnus (using MML syntax):
[...]
> Then the message generated by Gnus does not respect MIME
> conventions. The boundary string used for the top-level multipart is the
> same than the boundary string used for the innermost multipart (see
> below for the generated message).
Well, I couldn't actually reproduce it. With the MML from the Debian
bug and got the following. The boundary strings look legal, but
interestingly the rendering seems to be broken. I see
"--====-=-=--\n----------\n" after the line "Foo".
From nobody Tue Oct 25 17:04:52 2011
Message-ID: <m3vcrda4c6.fsf-ueno <at> unixuser.org>
From: Daiki Ueno <ueno <at> unixuser.org>
To: ueno <at> unixuser.org
Subject: test
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:04:45 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=====-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Lines: 39
Xref: localhost.localdomain outgoing.gpg:392
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 392 Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:04:52 +0900
--=====-=-=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
--====-=-=
Content-Disposition: inline
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="====-=-="
Foo
--====-=-=--
--=-=-=--
--=====-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=KT/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=====-=-=--
Could you try newer Gnus from the git?
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 256 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.