GNU bug report logs - #9767
24.0.90; gdb initialization on Cygwin

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>

Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:05:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.90

Done: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ken Brown <kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: schwab <at> linux-m68k.org, 9767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9767: 24.0.90; gdb initialization on Cygwin
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:51:09 -0400
On 10/21/2011 6:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:47:52 -0400
>> From: Ken Brown<kbrown <at> cornell.edu>
>> CC: Andreas Schwab<schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>, 9767 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> OK, I figured out what's happening, and it is related to SIGALRM after
>> all.  In line 4406 of process.c, wait_reading_process_output reduces the
>> timeout for the select call (under certain circumstances) in an attempt
>> to prevent select from being interrupted by SIGALRM.  This seems to me
>> to be inherently unreliable, and, in particular, it consistently fails
>> on Cygwin.  In other words, the SIGALRM is delivered before select times
>> out, causing select to get interrupted.  So wait_reading_process_output
>> does indeed loop, and select fails every time (except when a key is
>> pressed).
>
> Why does reducing the timeout works on, say, GNU/Linux, but not on
> Cygwin?  What is different?  Clock granularity, perhaps?

Sorry, I'm wrong again.  As Stefan pointed out, it's harmless that 
select gets interrupted by SIGALRM.  That can't explain the gdb problem, 
which still isn't solved.

Ken




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 219 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.