Subject: bug#9761: proposed list-buffers change -- revert buffer if point is in *Buffer List* buffer

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:10:01 +1030

Zachary Kanfer <[email-masked]> writes:

> The command list-buffers always puts point at the end of the
> buffer. This patch changes the list-buffers command to simply revert
> the buffer if point is inside the *Buffer List* buffer. Since point is
> kept at the same line, the user can more easily see what changes have
> occurred.

I think it makes sense to have `M-x list-buffers' always place the point
in the same place.  If the user wants to update the list, then the `g'
command is available and handy, and doesn't move the point around.  So
I'm closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no