From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 22:28:25 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 02:28:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4u-0005Xn-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:28:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4r-0005Xa-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:28:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4W-0000Lg-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:28:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:44557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4W-0000Lb-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:28:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4V-0004kf-BM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:28:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4T-0000LO-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:27:59 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:48154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDS4T-0000LC-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:27:57 -0400 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so6345494vws.0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=F2YkfFIm7ntQqDVLxfobuldukPiJrKMR93K0siYu/oA=; b=sPYFSeAyrBe+vHDgvNqK0luc4M7t4B4NOBElt/YkVGWFYiYuotJdeypOFhWCH/x1t9 vhuIajnG6Fb4fHbyqRbw7E0kfLAhD81d9N+0syPe3M2KsMpZ0KpBdsTGZKb7YWhSiJtK jb9kYrkjjbigULdx2xIn5e9HCHWVc5JDubNtU= Received: by 10.52.90.45 with SMTP id bt13mr16148563vdb.25.1318300076480; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MARVIN (71-212-157-18.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.212.157.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cx10sm11568969vdb.11.2011.10.10.19.27.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:27:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Scholtes To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:27:40 -0600 Message-ID: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) When ido-mode is enabled, completions buffers do not get killed when aborting a completion with C-g. In case of ido-find-file, the *Ido Completions* buffer seems to be buried, although cleared of any content and in Fundamental mode. In case of another function, e.g. C-h k, the *Completions* buffer seems to be buried instead of killed. When ido-mode is disabled, the all completions buffers get killed. emacs -Q M-: (ido-mode 1) C-x f Type t then C-g C-x b *Ido Completions* buffer is in buffer-list (but the buffer is strangely not in Completions mode, but Fundamental mode). C-h k Type x then C-g C-x b *Completions* buffer is in buffer-list I think on aborting completions with C-g both buffers should be killed to bot pollute the buffer-list, like it does when ido-mode is not enabled. In GNU Emacs 24.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2011-10-10 on MARVIN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt --cflags -I"C:/Program Files (x86)/GnuWin32/include" -ID:/devel/emacs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/gnutls-2.10.5-x86/include --ldflags -LD:/devel/emacs/gnutls-2.10.5-x86/lib' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENU value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Emacs-Lisp Minor modes in effect: paredit-mode: t my-keys-minor-mode: t erc-autojoin-mode: t erc-track-mode: t erc-match-mode: t erc-pcomplete-mode: t erc-stamp-mode: t recentf-mode: t desktop-save-mode: t autopair-mode: t autopair-global-mode: t yas/global-mode: t yas/minor-mode: t global-auto-revert-mode: t delete-selection-mode: t tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t size-indication-mode: t column-number-mode: t line-number-mode: t Recent input: M-x r e p o r t - e Recent messages: Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/mail-config.el (source)...done Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/gnus-config.el (source)...done Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/erc-config.el (source)...done Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/org-config.el (source)...done Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/keybindings.el (source)...done Loading c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/init-custom.el (source)...done Loading vc-hg...done Wrote c:/Users/Christoph/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/data/.emacs.desktop.lock Desktop: 2 buffers restored. For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort gnus-cite mail-extr gnus-msg gnus-art mm-uu mml2015 epg-config mm-view mml-smime smime password-cache dig mailcap emacsbug vc-hg paredit my-zenburn-theme erc-join erc-track erc-match erc-pcomplete erc-stamp erc-goodies erc erc-backend erc-compat thingatpt ispell bookmark+ bookmark+-key dired-x dired bookmark+-1 nnir gnus-sum nnoo gnus-group gnus-undo nnmail mail-source gnus-start gnus-spec gnus-int gnus-range message format-spec rfc822 mml mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader gnus-win gnus gnus-ems nnheader gnus-util mail-utils mm-util mail-prsvr bookmark+-bmu help-mode view bookmark+-lit pp+ bookmark+-mac bookmark pp recentf tree-widget wid-edit midnight desktop ibuffer uniquify autopair google-c-style cc-styles cc-align cc-engine cc-vars cc-defs browse-kill-ring+ browse-kill-ring second-sel ido yasnippet dropdown-list derived edmacro kmacro assoc cl org-habit org-agenda org byte-opt warnings bytecomp byte-compile cconv macroexp ob-emacs-lisp ob-tangle ob-ref ob-lob ob-table org-footnote org-src ob-comint ob-keys ob ob-eval org-pcomplete pcomplete comint ring org-list org-faces org-compat org-entities org-macs noutline outline easy-mmode regexp-opt cal-menu easymenu calendar cal-loaddefs org-install server advice help-fns advice-preload debbugs-autoloads package tabulated-list autorevert delsel time-date tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer button faces cus-face files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 23:37:01 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 03:37:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDT9J-0007pz-8t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:37:01 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDT9G-0007pn-Eu for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:36:59 -0400 Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so8125567iab.3 for <9724@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h0A9+steSaUYmC8wSLF3PcnDJDO2fUfJgR2WzSn3iTY=; b=v6GjF6xD5WIPPiJeMnH/sU4Sqb2q5UQWD3Ajlnl994FiFffAhP2c3X8dFbbvf8GfQx vQz0BInlCpXntnt3Igcp9nDzqIn4IyYQiVt+w3gZzlHW1wvEwTQrdcTMp1Ga2mRSEl9S DBTTUXiByypuQq2MRqTCEg4gsAHyPY8ookzVI= Received: by 10.42.159.1 with SMTP id j1mr22358753icx.20.1318304198198; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (71-212-157-18.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.212.157.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z11sm52076788iba.6.2011.10.10.20.36.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:36:34 -0600 From: Christoph Scholtes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) On 10/10/2011 8:27 PM, I wrote: > When ido-mode is enabled, completions buffers do not get killed when > aborting a completion with C-g. [...] > When ido-mode is disabled, the all completions buffers get killed. Actually, I was mistaken. The buffers do NOT get killed, when ido-mode is disabled. So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the completion buffers killed instead of buried? However, it is strange that the *Ido Completions* buffer is empty and in Fundamental mode after pressing C-g. Christoph From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 11 00:56:16 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2011 04:56:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDUNz-0001xN-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:56:16 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDUNy-0001xC-Q6 for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:56:15 -0400 Received: from ucsinet23.oracle.com (ucsinet23.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p9B4to89003381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:55:52 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by ucsinet23.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9B4tnt2011050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:55:50 GMT Received: from abhmt112.oracle.com (abhmt112.oracle.com [141.146.116.64]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p9B4tiEG027354; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:55:44 -0500 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.50.234) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:55:44 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Christoph Scholtes'" , <9724@debbugs.gnu.org> References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> Subject: RE: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:55:42 -0700 Message-ID: <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcyHxwnTkaS1x2H9ShqJUxiiaW8aFwACt4qA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: ucsinet23.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4E93CC58.01E4,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) > > When ido-mode is disabled, the all completions buffers get killed. > > Actually, I was mistaken. The buffers do NOT get killed, when > ido-mode is disabled. > > So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the > completion buffers killed instead of buried? Sounds like bug #9639...? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 11 21:46:16 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 01:46:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDntf-0007Mm-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:46:16 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDntd-0007MW-Nu; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:46:14 -0400 Received: by ggnk3 with SMTP id k3so198936ggn.3 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OUwYsS32LlhQ1OSfw7qI6OnkKl6tNDR/4eZzwMLRuvk=; b=BgT+WIA6R2PmLPLovGoNiTQShUQ+96HxHqMaKq+h+lE1FelyxAqj0CMWh5bXnKOcKK BKLA4s9+/NfZ8GJJSQcduCZOt0hgV/Re5bNSQp8To//3e5ukPPR0zEy/adKJwl6sOtns LRfzGibAWLfMQ7MyqmXDt5ESM/SzUWReTn8Eo= Received: by 10.101.133.6 with SMTP id k6mr5201974ann.54.1318383948397; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (71-212-150-156.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.212.150.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5sm1499128anl.13.2011.10.11.18.45.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:45:46 -0600 From: Christoph Scholtes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) merge 9724 9639 quit On 10/10/2011 10:55 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >>> When ido-mode is disabled, the all completions buffers get killed. >> >> Actually, I was mistaken. The buffers do NOT get killed, when >> ido-mode is disabled. >> >> So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the >> completion buffers killed instead of buried? > > Sounds like bug #9639...? You are right. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 00:10:28 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 04:10:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDq9C-00031V-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:10:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDq99-00031O-JL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:10:24 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDq8n-0008OR-Uv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:10:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:10:01 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 9724 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) forcemerge 9639 9724 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 02:53:17 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 06:53:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDsgm-0007cJ-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:17 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDsgj-0007bv-Ae for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:14 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 06:52:45 -0000 Received: from 62-47-62-98.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.62.98]) [62.47.62.98] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2011 08:52:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XZ4hyAGxXPzCMxcx3dZTyeKoHuIIrq9xm6dJnxr AFW/toP06JkQkt Message-ID: <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:52:44 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Scholtes Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) >>> So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the >>> completion buffers killed instead of buried? >> >> Sounds like bug #9639...? > > You are right. Thanks. The fix for bug#9639 doesn't change anything wrt whether the completion buffer gets killed or buried. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 08:29:18 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 12:29:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDxvx-0007qr-SF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:29:18 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDxvu-0007qf-O8 for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:29:15 -0400 Received: by iaby26 with SMTP id y26so748069iab.3 for <9724@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vXNb9ZHOOefJjaFhTs+5EzWx1qtEsgrsENy0STKQZWk=; b=QDtnJekQQJ5xXqPpzwVOziJJvfsBQS575jiqZLvh9l8eAl5TCtmKBYZE7NoGbQBMul WbLW2iED4YpQYsDjL/bXSKCIC7WdeLZroPJr+mljjl58EQtjezhzA+wHSlPhHm1U42Fr vh8g1jQJ32q6d8j1MGpBvy3No3T0p0andcZ1s= Received: by 10.42.189.6 with SMTP id dc6mr34761386icb.16.1318422526751; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (71-208-78-27.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.208.78.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm5270549ibc.3.2011.10.12.05.28.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9587F9.5020207@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:28:41 -0600 From: Christoph Scholtes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) On 10/12/2011 12:52 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > >>> So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the > >>> completion buffers killed instead of buried? > >> > >> Sounds like bug #9639...? > > > > You are right. Thanks. > > The fix for bug#9639 doesn't change anything wrt whether the completion > buffer gets killed or buried. Yes, I know. However the other discussion in that bug thread does sound relevant. I posted a question last night about a variable you said you had introduced, but I couldn't find it. I might not have cc'ed you on the message. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 10:25:42 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 14:25:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzkc-0003BJ-Dr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:25:42 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDzkZ-0003B3-Nx for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:25:40 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 14:25:10 -0000 Received: from 62-47-38-233.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.38.233]) [62.47.38.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2011 16:25:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/mA6c5XQDm07JCkvGJ2hi+gutSYQwfdTT7dAER/R N8uI2IDPf4/u4r Message-ID: <4E95A345.4070503@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:25:09 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Scholtes Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> <4E9587F9.5020207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9587F9.5020207@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > Yes, I know. However the other discussion in that bug thread does sound > relevant. I posted a question last night about a variable you said you > had introduced, but I couldn't find it. I might not have cc'ed you on > the message. I hope you found the variable in the meantime. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 21:34:06 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2011 01:34:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REABS-0006aR-KS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:34:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REABP-0006Zv-Hz for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:34:04 -0400 Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so611315ywm.3 for <9724@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jCxv0RxQhaEad0dSv2R7mFH4mSgUQQo2kBwJSdD3wPg=; b=jb3tecpsEtOigKSTV7xy3RsaIeRBhE5grYAsLM/Qt8dBiMlMja2fqcwabwrADRA754 ADg4anJjNFSvyCFaJA1jODs4QlKU/E2ExWGBEWyGT26Y37fHItltRnboi3PS9i0ch953 j2qSyNeOsZVfN08T9mV5pVBw5X3cJZS/9DU3o= Received: by 10.150.13.2 with SMTP id 2mr2830433ybm.49.1318469612312; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (71-208-78-27.hlrn.qwest.net. [71.208.78.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e19sm11362423anm.6.2011.10.12.18.33.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E963FE9.8050808@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:33:29 -0600 From: Christoph Scholtes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> <4E9587F9.5020207@gmail.com> <4E95A345.4070503@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <4E95A345.4070503@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) On 10/12/2011 8:25 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > Yes, I know. However the other discussion in that bug thread does sound > > relevant. I posted a question last night about a variable you said you > > had introduced, but I couldn't find it. I might not have cc'ed you on > > the message. > > I hope you found the variable in the meantime. Yes, thanks. However, setting the variable to delete-frame still does not kill the *Completions* buffer on aborting the completion attempt. Am I missing anything? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 13 02:53:27 2011 Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2011 06:53:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REFAV-0005QJ-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:53:27 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REFAR-0005Q5-Gd for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:53:25 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2011 06:52:50 -0000 Received: from 62-47-35-34.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.35.34]) [62.47.35.34] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 13 Oct 2011 08:52:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18UXscGCbsUhocMgwkMt+k2J6s6WdlKMQx/1OJ4NJ pg8c3bgXsGCAK/ Message-ID: <4E968AC1.1000003@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:52:49 +0200 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Scholtes Subject: Re: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> <4E9587F9.5020207@gmail.com> <4E95A345.4070503@gmx.at> <4E963FE9.8050808@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E963FE9.8050808@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9724 Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > However, setting the variable to delete-frame still does not kill the > *Completions* buffer on aborting the completion attempt. Am I missing > anything? I tried to explain that when I wrote >>>> So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the >>>> completion buffers killed instead of buried? >>> >>> Sounds like bug #9639...? >> >> You are right. Thanks. > > The fix for bug#9639 doesn't change anything wrt whether the completion > buffer gets killed or buried. So let me try to explain this once more: (1) Whether the buffer shall be killed or buried is decided by the function setting up the completion buffer. (2) Whether the window showing the completion buffer is deleted or not is decided by (i) whether the buffer shall be killed or buried and, if the window appears on a standalone frame and the buffer shall be buried, (ii) the value of `frame-auto-hide-function'. Bug#9724 is about (1) only. Bug#9639 is about (2) only and not relevant here. Merging these two bugs was an incorrect decision. martin From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:53:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator