GNU bug report logs - #9723
24.0.50; Emacs Clipboard crash

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Joseph Jones <josejones <at> expedia.com>

Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Joseph Jones <josejones <at> expedia.com>
Cc: 9723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9723: 24.0.50; Emacs Clipboard crash
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:49:15 +0200
> From: Joseph Jones <josejones <at> expedia.com>
> CC: "9723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:29:33 -0700
> 
> Just got a new crash while in GDB. Here is the GDB session information you requested last time.

Thanks.

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 13664.0x2a74]
> 0x010df89c in exec_byte_code (bytestr=20911730, vector=20911730, maxdepth=8578712, args_template=16837538, nargs=23009797,
>     args=0x186a00) at bytecode.c:1012
> 1012    bytecode.c: No such file or directory.
>         in bytecode.c
> (gdb) i threads
>   63 Thread 13664.0x38b4  0x7d61c876 in ntdll!NtAccessCheck () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>   4 Thread 13664.0x3060  0x7d61c876 in ntdll!NtAccessCheck () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>   3 Thread 13664.0x1c64  0x7d61c846 in ntdll!NtAccessCheck () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
>   2 Thread 13664.0x33e4  0x7d947860 in USER32!SetActiveWindow () from C:\WINDOWS\syswow64\user32.dll
> * 1 Thread 13664.0x2a74  0x010df89c in exec_byte_code (bytestr=20911730, vector=20911730, maxdepth=8578712,
>     args_template=16837538, nargs=23009797, args=0x186a00) at bytecode.c:1012
> (gdb) bt 63
> #0  0x010df89c in exec_byte_code (bytestr=20911730, vector=20911730, maxdepth=8578712, args_template=16837538,
>     nargs=23009797, args=0x186a00) at bytecode.c:1012
> #1  0x010dfd99 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=23009797, vector=1600000, maxdepth=8578600, args_template=17642311, nargs=20835142,
>     args=0x13e281a) at bytecode.c:1182
> #2  0x0100eba2 in make_lispy_position (f=0x10dfd6c, x=23009797, y=20835142, t=17593177) at keyboard.c:5148
> #3  0x010e0d54 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=0, vector=0, maxdepth=20850714, args_template=20850714, nargs=0, args=0x0)
>     at bytecode.c:1730
> #4  0x01025592 in Fsequencep (object=-875902696) at data.c:352
> #5  0x010279f6 in let_shadows_buffer_binding_p (symbol=0x13e281a) at data.c:1082
> #6  0x01029a11 in Fkill_local_variable (variable=8583808) at data.c:1672
> #7  0x0100ee4f in make_lispy_position (f=0x1029871, x=20908442, y=16922106, t=2102413915) at keyboard.c:5168
> #8  0x0101cf4b in read_key_sequence (keybuf=0x13e281a, bufsize=7602259, prompt=7209057, dont_downcase_last=6357092,
>     can_return_switch_frame=20906466, fix_current_buffer=20850714) at keyboard.c:9472
> #9  0x0100ed84 in make_lispy_position (f=0x13f01e2, x=16895784, y=20850714, t=2009014352) at keyboard.c:5163
> #10 0x0101cdfe in read_key_sequence (keybuf=0x101cac1, bufsize=20850714, prompt=2009021072, dont_downcase_last=8585048,
>     can_return_switch_frame=0, fix_current_buffer=-1) at keyboard.c:9452
> #11 0x0101cf12 in read_key_sequence (keybuf=0x135bdd6, bufsize=0, prompt=1, dont_downcase_last=0,
>     can_return_switch_frame=8585028, fix_current_buffer=8584944) at keyboard.c:9472
> #12 0x01002eb0 in shut_down_emacs (sig=1, no_x=11551144, stuff=11546872) at emacs.c:2039
> #13 0x010010b6 in __mingw_CRTStartup ()
> #14 0x01001148 in WinMainCRTStartup ()
> #15 0x00000001 in ?? ()
> #16 0x00000001 in ?? ()
> #17 0x00000000 in ?? ()

I don't understand this backtrace.  It says that Emacs was being shut
down because of a fatal signal.  sig=1 on Windows means SIGHUP, and
the only relevant place seems to be this line in keyboard.c:

                kill (getpid (), SIGHUP);

But even if this is so, how come GDB shows that shut_down_emacs was
called from the library startup code, and why does it say that
shut_down_emacs calls read_key_sequence?  There are no such calls in
the code, and this being an unoptimized build, I don't expect any
intermediate functions to be inlined and disappear from the backtrace.

If you set a breakpoint in shut_down_emacs, do you get a more
reasonable backtrace?

In any case, it looks like the crash is secondary; the primary reason
is that Emacs hits some fatal error and commits suicide.  Why that
happens is still a mystery for me, as is why it happens only to you.




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 10 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.