From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 07 05:15:12 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2011 09:15:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6WO-0007U5-59 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:15:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6WL-0007Tq-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:15:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6W2-0008WK-Jz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:14:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:36951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6W2-0008WG-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:14:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6W1-0007pH-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:14:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6W0-0008W2-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:14:49 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:39483 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC6W0-0008Vv-Nd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 05:14:48 -0400 Received: (qmail 20919 invoked by uid 3782); 7 Oct 2011 09:14:47 -0000 Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951B9DD.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.185.221]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:14:46 +0200 Received: (qmail 3073 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Oct 2011 09:10:23 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:10:23 +0000 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Misleading documentation in "Persistent Mark". Message-ID: <20111007091023.GA3054@acm.acm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Alan Mackenzie X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) Hi, Emacs. The chapter "Persistent Mark" in the Emacs manual is misleading. The chapter title suggests that the mark is otherwise transient. This is not the case by default, since `mark-even-if-inactive' is non-nil by default. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 13:39:59 2011 Received: (at 9688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 17:39:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE2mc-0000wr-Uu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:59 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE2mb-0000wZ-F7 for 9688@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:58 -0400 Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-81.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9CHdR5C016989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:28 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: Alan Mackenzie Subject: Re: bug#9688: Misleading documentation in "Persistent Mark". References: <20111007091023.GA3054@acm.acm> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111007091023.GA3054@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 7 Oct 2011 09:10:23 +0000") Message-ID: <87d3e2cdo0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9688 Cc: 9688@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Alan Mackenzie writes: > The chapter "Persistent Mark" in the Emacs manual is misleading. > > The chapter title suggests that the mark is otherwise transient. This is > not the case by default, since `mark-even-if-inactive' is non-nil by > default. Fair enough; renamed to "Disabled Transient Mark". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 12 13:40:12 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 17:40:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE2mq-0000xq-3C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:40:12 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE2mo-0000xc-Fy for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:40:10 -0400 Received: from furball (dhcp-128-36-14-81.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9CHdf8B022665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:41 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 9688 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87ehyihzxf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 9688 thanks From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:00:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator