GNU bug report logs -
#9681
Broken behaviour of re-search-backward (.+ matching only a single character)
Previous Next
Reported by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:20:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: notabug
Merged with 11025,
24801
Found in versions 23.1, 25.1
Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #29 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 08:57:09AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> re-search-* stops at the first character position that has a match.
> And then it chooses the longest match at that position.
Stepan wrote:
> So, again: it definitely needs better documentation,
> and IMO it also needs fixing.
Hi!
For my own imenu-prev-index-position-function, I needed
a backward regexp search which would match something like ".+"
the way one (like Stepan) can expect rather than the way it actually
does (as described by Stefan).
So, I just wrote a function to do that.
The way it handles the COUNT variable is not as good as one could want
but, as I almost never use it, I don't care.
It's not very efficient but, since I can't notice the time it takes
when used in the "*rescan" menu and since I can't imagine a better algorithm,
it's ok for me.
(defun jd-re-search-backward (regexp &optional bound noerror count)
(let ((orig-point (point)) bom)
(when (re-search-backward regexp bound noerror count)
(setq bom (point)) ; should not be useful
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (re-search-forward regexp orig-point 'noerror)
;; remember the last beginning of match
(setq bom (match-beginning 0)))
(goto-char bom)
;; set match data (erased by the last failing search) and return T
(looking-at regexp))))
HTH
)jack(
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 206 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.