From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 05 16:06:01 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2011 20:06:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXj6-00070N-Pi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:06:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNc-0006Uf-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNQ-0006Xi-TD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:38822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNQ-0006Xe-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNP-0005vv-Q3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNO-0006X9-8t for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:35 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:42322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXNO-0006Wv-3a for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:43:34 -0400 Received: by ggdk5 with SMTP id k5so1228846ggd.0 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:43:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fHqmaUT+i8zlj+FW7yIKqZn4S2IAx47GsFpkI1CGJEs=; b=pa6t1xHZWr+8xMMAIY3zutg1cIy0OELKqButINYEj8e1cKLynGr1g7+iBLGj+WkfQe mQJTd6bBhAZKLQJxaHoIRHHnDdTebhwvDuGAcCUaD3LxOERAKew2HOERnHZMGxm3XTtt L6m5b03it9vjPTkrTYw9qBCXPlG8Dt5OmSnfk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.95.12 with SMTP id s12mr2721323ybb.436.1317843813071; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.100.18 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:43:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Compiling geiser doc.scm failure. From: Dale Smith To: bug-guile@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:05:59 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) I was having some difficulty using geiser with a recent guile, and noticed an error in my *geiser messages* buffer: INFO: RETORT: ((error (key . retort-syntax)) (output . ";;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable. ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/emacs.scm ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/evaluation.scm ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/modules.scm ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/utils.scm ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/utils.scm.go ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/modules.scm.go ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/evaluation.scm.go ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/completion.scm ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/completion.scm.go ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/xref.scm ;;; compiling /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/doc.scm ;;; WARNING: compilation of /usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/doc.scm failed: ;;; ERROR: In procedure scm_hash_fn_create_handle_x: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting hash-table): #f ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/xref.scm.go ;;; compiled /home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/usr/local/share/geiser/guile/geiser/emacs.scm.go $1 = done The message wasn't that helpful in locating the problem, so I tried compiling the file directly: wrote `/home/dsmith/.cache/guile/ccache/2.0-LE-4-2.0/home/dsmith/src/mainline/scheme/guile/geiser/completion.scm.go' Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 170: 19 [catch #t # ...] In unknown file: ?: 18 [catch-closure] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 62: 17 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...] In ice-9/eval.scm: 389: 16 [eval # #] In /usr/local/bin/guild: 68: 15 [main ("/usr/local/bin/guild" "compile" "-L" ...)] In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 619: 14 [for-each # #] In scripts/compile.scm: 174: 13 [# "geiser/doc.scm"] In system/base/compile.scm: 148: 12 [compile-file "geiser/doc.scm" #:output-file ...] 43: 11 [call-once #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 184: 10 [with-throw-handler #t ...] In system/base/compile.scm: 59: 9 [#] 151: 8 [# #] 200: 7 [read-and-compile # #:from ...] 232: 6 [compile # # # ...] 178: 5 [lp # # # ...] In language/tree-il/compile-glil.scm: 64: 4 [compile-glil # # #] In language/tree-il/analyze.scm: 536: 3 [analyze-lexicals #] 394: 2 [allocate! # #f 0] In unknown file: ?: 1 [hashq-set! #f # #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 119: 0 [# wrong-type-arg ...] ice-9/boot-9.scm:119:20: In procedure #: ice-9/boot-9.scm:119:20: In procedure scm_hash_fn_create_handle_x: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting hash-table): #f That looks more like a problem with guile than geiser so I did a bisect from the 2.0.2 release: 40be30c97459e1baf8a9997c1c116a67f153cfef is the first bad commit commit 40be30c97459e1baf8a9997c1c116a67f153cfef Author: Andy Wingo Date: Tue Sep 27 23:21:53 2011 +0200 peval: more effective binding pruning * module/language/tree-il/optimize.scm (peval): Factor prune-bindings out of `let' and company. Have it process unreferenced bindings in effect context instead of always residualizing non-constant expressions. :040000 040000 ba7e3a49bef54cbb529f07970219f5a2b16a3036 74128c8f9e22b846ddcf9d7f4e9e7dd8b77f4cbf M module :040000 040000 10e88d61baaf6072fc4051c8f6530ad24b4baaa3 c513a2d03b1b8308ffb4915517fe3b7994b6e88e M test-suite bisect run success From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 10 10:06:39 2011 Received: (at 9677-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2011 14:06:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDGV5-00030g-2u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:06:39 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62] helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDGV1-00030V-DA for 9677-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:06:37 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664B87E83; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:06:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cPirc3RpunsBe7bQW6u/S1Tfy8U=; b=qs3jR8 ZPRnXfH7xXBZhOKoRzj9Db01hf40QBeTjT8432WOrintnPFs5sI0p0OZnBqXaClG dE4QvPXY63shuW8gUTAmOoD8ZSf0BD9XnmW6mcRo+9/DttKKN7vbvdG9iJc3jf5G 7JxqRzOiFJUk/66BMIyxzkO1jItZ3hyzpCzNY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WszU++bUaceqcA+9jNybPYpl34LZGGZF QEq8vhnHUcTmrCR2s7rNF5J0hI0SlcuUGT3ZDNLK0Wv+epoqiIujS34izjxUSDbD TzRQq/zrhX+a/zcvYrip6uC4MOdTmEegyIK3EquXSoBGN+PK2V+gZXTbXsP1r8Go QHlx/PHxP9o= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3D37E82; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7D957E81; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: Dale Smith Subject: Re: bug#9677: Compiling geiser doc.scm failure. References: Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:06:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dale Smith's message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:43:33 -0400") Message-ID: <87aa99szz8.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08F63FD4-F349-11E0-867A-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9677-done Cc: 9677-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Wed 05 Oct 2011 21:43, Dale Smith writes: > I was having some difficulty using geiser with a recent guile, and > noticed an error in my *geiser messages* buffer: Thanks for the report. I believe that I have fixed this now in stable-2.0 and master. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:18:42 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator