From xah@xahlee.org Thu Sep 11 15:02:54 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Sep 2008 22:02:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8BM2nne004186 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:02:51 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KduFU-0006Pd-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:02:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KduFR-0006PJ-RS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:02:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37299 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KduFR-0006PG-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:02:45 -0400 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.197]:49705) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KduFQ-0007lg-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:02:45 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-24-6-185-159.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.185.159]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1KduFC32Tt-0005CI; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:02:32 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: xah lee Subject: no support for viewing bmp images? Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:02:28 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18rIEsInanQkZWVmga0xUg3nz6sbRYavmbw2g1 HVO5yjF7Rq/iSez2LkR+gZ64yAp1/uJLS/Kma4icaJ3j0L42OO spzSuXsYNF8QConaschug== X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) I tried to open a bmp image file, but when it opened in a buffer it =20 shows ascii. for example, i can view jpg, gif, png image files. In GNU Emacs 22.2.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0) of 2008-04-05 on g5.tokyo.stp.isas.jaxa.jp Windowing system distributor `Apple Inc.', version 10.4.11 configured using `configure '--prefix=3D/Applications/Emacs.app/=20 Contents/Resources' '--with-carbon' '--without-x' '--libexecdir=3D/=20 Volumes/Emacs/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/libexec' 'CFLAGS=3D-Os -arch =20 i386 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk -DUSE_ATSUI -=20= DUSE_MAC_TSM'' Recent messages: ./Snapshot_001.bmp ./Snapshot_002.bmp ./Snapshot_003.bmp ./Snapshot_004.bmp Xah =E2=88=91 http://xahlee.org/ =E2=98=84 =E2=98=84 From rgm@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 15:28:12 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MISSING_SUBJECT, NOSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Sep 2008 22:28:13 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8GMS9Dk001162 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:28:11 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kfizt-0007Cb-MQ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:26:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18640.12933.315755.574070@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:26:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: control X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: yellow X-Ran: dIfu%gf1M<^Gr%wqoYP:0Z%{[R*O[{$2*J;/dAU=UKg\PwGFs+TY#$9h/M0;b3=[JA~8vY X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes reopen 850 tags 850 unreproducible severity 963 wishlist From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 19 16:46:18 2011 Received: (at 963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2011 20:46:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjHBG-0004Er-Kb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:46:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjHB9-0004EY-Us for 963@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:46:12 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33023) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjHB4-000529-5B; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:46:02 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 963@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#963: no support for viewing bmp images? References: X-Spook: BATF SP4 afsatcom Tony Blair Putin fundamentalist X-Ran: :|S6'{,py&mtVK*DZvb/RlbL76iJVJX%0B)[\9'{7D?CcV[PV]D:a@8(PQ9ea:w)]/!"{K X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:46:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (xah lee's message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:02:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 963 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Emacs 24.1 will be able to view bmp files through the ImageMagick library. However, it looks like this is not implemented for the Nextstep port (from examining configure), nor for MS Windows (?), ref thread http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-09/msg01579.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-10/msg00002.html The documentation doesn't seem to make this explicit, it probably should. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 20 12:17:45 2019 Received: (at 963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 16:17:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i06pN-0001YT-2V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:17:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:34460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i06pK-0001YC-IV for 963@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:17:43 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n9so3524555pgc.1 for <963@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:17:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V9UAAd2M78yQIHbQTAATipUNk+l8mNZvMoXwLiKFawM=; b=RBmukXDQ+f4HW0PBtesxVBQWUffvnxk8IkTv7LtbP3+/SAidhdTmt5L7OPzTNmRmQR urU6f15N5wuRAEc7uNHYYROGp0/YJWBCHxJHnehQNwhJJpx/Ifupfb9kReckbAVfHiNU c6mbfjzgow7VmOuf2nugdElsO1pNhjPoSDlVGsjaZXTa9FZXT5k6bko8rvLkV/TM+k39 1Zhv01S1c2++rD5jlwsl3NyVdV4XA0LBh3JhBvdFUKXmUfU8rgxod4DgeJkp5qfvM8Uz WoS2mlq98OxlRzaHkVh8CpWplHjleOSHcw5EsFVYt6oHGNEcqUbnS9/9o0v9onnTFpoR D2Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWISjSKc62HiV7uHJvJ8UDDF582FaVg+akkfDvq+zqkQ6X5IXHy 6GaSv29EBH+X3Fi8g5jrGecPROK9fbaebaRZiN4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2F4WoqYQatJYh3DwxwZnkikjtUeK2WWgWjSEX5I4BDNlzk8G9j1ITsqIrvYenBAtvnGLHbrIKDD26DCbdhO0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:17ab:: with SMTP id q40mr811124pja.106.1566317856550; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:17:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:17:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#963: no support for viewing bmp images? To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 963 Cc: 963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Glenn Morris writes: > Emacs 24.1 will be able to view bmp files through the ImageMagick > library. However, it looks like this is not implemented for the Nextstep > port (from examining configure), nor for MS Windows (?), ref thread > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-09/msg01579.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-10/msg00002.html > > The documentation doesn't seem to make this explicit, it probably > should. This is from 2011 and should probably have been closed, since we had bmp support in Emacs 24.1. But since it wasn't, here's the current state of affairs AFAICT: When I compile the current master branch using --with-imagemagick, viewing bmp images works for me. But imagemagick is now disabled by default (and rightly so). Without imagemagick compiled in I just get garbled text when opening a bmp file. Using Emacs 26.1 from Debian I can view BMP images just fine, as expected, since it comes with imagemagick support. It seems to me that Emacs is missing BMP support if built without imagemagick. It would be nice to not depend on that library for this use case. Thanks, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 26 14:11:15 2019 Received: (at 963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2019 18:11:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44775 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDYEV-0004Rl-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:11:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38106) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDYEU-0004Rc-Cm for 963@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:11:14 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDYEQ-0006BQ-SY; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:11:13 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#963: no support for viewing bmp images? References: Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:11:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:17:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87muerj5c1.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > When I compile the current master branch using --with-imagemagick, > viewing bmp images works for me. But imagemagick is now disabled by > default (and rightly so). Without imagemagick compiled in I [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 963 Cc: Glenn Morris , 963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > When I compile the current master branch using --with-imagemagick, > viewing bmp images works for me. But imagemagick is now disabled by > default (and rightly so). Without imagemagick compiled in I just get > garbled text when opening a bmp file. > > Using Emacs 26.1 from Debian I can view BMP images just fine, as > expected, since it comes with imagemagick support. > > It seems to me that Emacs is missing BMP support if built without > imagemagick. It would be nice to not depend on that library for this > use case. Are BMP images used much, though? I can't remember the last time I saw one in the wild. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 06:40:52 2019 Received: (at 963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 10:40:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDngC-0007ER-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:40:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:46869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDngB-0007EE-3B for 963@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 06:40:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id q24so922142plr.13 for <963@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CR/nd4bCWg8jQdSsxtF9Yq11PRiN9nrXmLZgkcgRzv0=; b=rmA7iQ43WnbciYcJIa9J7rxYIgTdqXSyCQnrELw6Vw+8UUU5Juv/3Se9d4ru2bob66 Hm6KCPyeDWFyODQ4yzU1u4fA8sUD7/w27P5bDC7GAe6mGWmkrHglWqvzmQKJ5828y8gz rclPwikCs5xwP8CHUab+gUVINJ5CWmsCVSbQFuI0K7tVMyzQHbBp4cnA3MKGDXL77/af Ck7X+enHM9dNy+hYLUg4i0+e42R+s1T5/J1Ga/JixrFpRFaXEj3xtT6dVVV51Zwpn4yt d1SquJwQFYdttxKwjgqiPzWj+sUBwtJZeDyGf0CSJjCB6qxvx3oAx3AlkELYzYl/fN85 mZUg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWL6AP3BVYx+nvRKvQ/aFLkPwx6OsYnel5dIKw9e+yFUqU3Zmml RHEJ0FIQk5QRdHLpsNo9J3dSYNcLy6yYNlBmbXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxd4G0eUFCYTh7FZemdNj7iwiyJCwVGokl+Qj3jj0NkOqLB4/ty6ZqLksU8axbGaPITYI3YEjVK36e3Rh1XiM8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a515:: with SMTP id s21mr3925858plq.259.1569580845340; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:40:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87muerj5c1.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87muerj5c1.fsf@gnus.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#963: no support for viewing bmp images? To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 963 Cc: Glenn Morris , 963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Are BMP images used much, though? I can't remember the last time I saw > one in the wild. I remember seeing them in stuff like tutorials for how to load an image in language and suchlike. Perhaps I saw was some Scheme stuff a couple of years ago where the examples used BMP...? I can't remember exactly. It might have been PNG too, to be honest. I still think it would be a nice little feature to have. But I won't protest if this is closed as wontfix either. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 09:41:58 2019 Received: (at 963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 13:41:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVR-0005By-V3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:41:58 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVR-0005Bp-07 for 963@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:41:57 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVN-0001xi-9y; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:41:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#963: no support for viewing bmp images? References: <87muerj5c1.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:41:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:40:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87ef01q2ji.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > I remember seeing them in stuff like tutorials for how to load an > image in language and suchlike. Perhaps I saw was some Scheme > stuff a couple of years ago where the examples used BMP...? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 963 Cc: Glenn Morris , 963@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > I remember seeing them in stuff like tutorials for how to load an > image in language and suchlike. Perhaps I saw was some Scheme > stuff a couple of years ago where the examples used BMP...? I can't > remember exactly. It might have been PNG too, to be honest. > > I still think it would be a nice little feature to have. But I won't > protest if this is closed as wontfix either. Yeah, I think this is one of those image formats we'll just have to defer users to ImageMagick if they want to see... This reminds me: Since we don't really want to point users towards compiling with ImageMagick due to security concerns -- would it make sense to write a shim over external utilities to handle exotic formats? I mean, it would just have to call "convert" in a temp buffer to some format we do handle (like PNG). But I guess that doesn't really deal with the security issue, as buffer overflows in "convert" will do pretty much the same as in Emacs. But it would lead to fewer segfaults in Emacs itself, so perhaps it's worth doing? It'd be a pretty trivial shim, and we could deprecate compiling with ImageMagick for sure. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 09:42:11 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 13:42:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVf-0005Cs-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:42:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVd-0005Cj-Eq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:42:09 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqVa-00020J-Mo for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:42:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:42:06 +0200 Message-Id: <87d0flq2j5.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #963 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 963 wontfix close 963 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 963 wontfix close 963 quit From unknown Thu Aug 14 12:24:38 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator