GNU bug report logs - #9605
24.0.90; initial point in *scratch* buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka <at> jpl.org>
Subject: bug#9605: closed (Re: bug#9605: 24.0.90; initial point in
 *scratch* buffer)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:25:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#9605: 24.0.90; initial point in *scratch* buffer

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 9605 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
9605: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9605
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: 9605-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka <at> jpl.org>
Subject: Re: bug#9605: 24.0.90; initial point in *scratch* buffer
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:23:25 +0200

>> When I start Emacs with the argument `-q' and type `q' the cursor
>> is put at the beginning of the *scratch* buffer.  But shouldn't it
>> be the end of the buffer?
> 
> Yes it should. It goes to point-min because the *GNU Emacs* window has a
> quit-restore parameter that looks like:
> 
> (other (#<buffer *scratch*> 1 1 33 ...
> 
> I don't know what is supposed to update this.

Should be fixed now.  Please try again.

martin

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka <at> jpl.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.0.90; initial point in *scratch* buffer
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:28:13 +0900

When I start Emacs with the argument `-q' and type `q' the cursor
is put at the beginning of the *scratch* buffer.  But shouldn't it
be the end of the buffer?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.