GNU bug report logs -
#9597
23.3; [diff-mode] Can't quite cope with git patches
Previous Next
Reported by: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 02:01:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 23.3
Done: Dima Kogan <dima <at> secretsauce.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #17 received at 9597 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi. This is still an outstanding bug. Can we please revisit this? I'm
attaching a version of Juri Linkov's patch that applies cleanly to the
latest master. This patch solves the issue. Do we not like it?
[fix-git-diffs.patch (text/x-diff, inline)]
diff --git a/lisp/vc/diff-mode.el b/lisp/vc/diff-mode.el
index 75fd420..d1a5156 100644
--- a/lisp/vc/diff-mode.el
+++ b/lisp/vc/diff-mode.el
@@ -437,6 +437,9 @@ diff-valid-unified-empty-line
(defconst diff-hunk-header-re
(concat "^\\(?:" diff-hunk-header-re-unified ".*\\|\\*\\{15\\}.*\n\\*\\*\\* .+ \\*\\*\\*\\*\\|[0-9]+\\(,[0-9]+\\)?[acd][0-9]+\\(,[0-9]+\\)?\\)$"))
(defconst diff-file-header-re (concat "^\\(--- .+\n\\+\\+\\+ \\|\\*\\*\\* .+\n--- \\|[^-+!<>0-9@* \n]\\).+\n" (substring diff-hunk-header-re 1)))
+
+(defconst diff-separator-re "^--+ ?$")
+
(defvar diff-narrowed-to nil)
(defun diff-hunk-style (&optional style)
@@ -1604,15 +1607,20 @@ diff-sanity-check-hunk
(pcase (char-after)
(?\s (cl-decf before) (cl-decf after) t)
(?-
- (if (and (looking-at diff-file-header-re)
- (zerop before) (zerop after))
- ;; No need to query: this is a case where two patches
- ;; are concatenated and only counting the lines will
- ;; give the right result. Let's just add an empty
- ;; line so that our code which doesn't count lines
- ;; will not get confused.
- (progn (save-excursion (insert "\n")) nil)
- (cl-decf before) t))
+ (cond
+ ((and (looking-at diff-separator-re)
+ (zerop before) (zerop after))
+ nil)
+ ((and (looking-at diff-file-header-re)
+ (zerop before) (zerop after))
+ ;; No need to query: this is a case where two patches
+ ;; are concatenated and only counting the lines will
+ ;; give the right result. Let's just add an empty
+ ;; line so that our code which doesn't count lines
+ ;; will not get confused.
+ (save-excursion (insert "\n")) nil)
+ (t
+ (cl-decf before) t)))
(?+ (cl-decf after) t)
(_
(cond
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 113 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.