GNU bug report logs -
#9564
23.3; doc of `face-list'
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:42:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 23.3
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 9564 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 9564 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#9564
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Both doc string and Elisp manual say that `face-list' returns a list of
face names. This is incorrect or at least misleading. A "name" value
in Emacs typically refers to a string value. The doc should say clearly
that the list elements are face _symbols_, not face "names".
In GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt --cflags
-Ic:/imagesupport/include'
Reply sent
to
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 9564-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Both doc string and Elisp manual say that `face-list' returns a list of
> face names. This is incorrect or at least misleading. A "name" value
> in Emacs typically refers to a string value. The doc should say clearly
> that the list elements are face _symbols_, not face "names".
Indeed, thank you. Actually, they're just faces. And faces happen to
be represented by symbols.
Should be fixed now,
Stefan
Message #11 received at 9564-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > Both doc string and Elisp manual say that `face-list'
> > returns a list of face names. This is incorrect or at
> > least misleading. A "name" value in Emacs typically
> > refers to a string value. The doc should say clearly
> > that the list elements are face _symbols_, not face "names".
>
> Indeed, thank you. Actually, they're just faces. And faces happen to
> be represented by symbols. Should be fixed now,
Well, yes, at one level faces are symbols - just like characters are whole
numbers. But at another level it can be useful to distinguish the two
(conceptually). And we do so. In several places we speak of "face symbols". I
think that general helps clarity rather than hurting it, but yes, at some point
users (e.g., programmers) need to understand that faces are symbols.
Another advantage in using that terminology is that while all faces are symbols,
not all symbols are faces. Those that are can reasonably be called "face
symbols" (as we do now, in other places).
Anyway, thanks for the quick fix.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 304 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.