From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:15:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9551: 24.0.50; bold font overlapped on windows platform. Resent-From: Kevin Yu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:51:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 9551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 9551@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131643664121880 (code B ref -1); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:51:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2011 12:50:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5dJ2-0005gq-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:50:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YdB-0004NV-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:51:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YYG-0007eY-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:46:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:42539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YYG-0007eU-FQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:46:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YYF-0007WL-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:46:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YYE-0007e0-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:46:03 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:39078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5YYE-0007dl-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:46:02 -0400 Received: by fxh17 with SMTP id 17so4072264fxh.0 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Dg6Pu4erWfbCkJ4RTU+acWiHMXyLmRG4f+gYMjAoJoQ=; b=DjJ/0UqJDFJBeL0LpUjTs/PUwzneC/CFwXDpDylW6wGfYoWKz1fzZq0yMTG2d8bjhl XReg3RBW17CxEv09I4bJun/QDhKHCz7Eu9oIMI5tnutwZwA/bkOh1LqpUbT7jZdwZved sOCC0n55P3GenpoSc/H7DNqgxTXGeXBKURb6Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.97.220 with SMTP id m28mr4752789fan.20.1316418360217; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.96.8 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:46:00 +0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:50:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Some fonts have different font width between normal and bold face. It seems like emacs assumes that they do have the same width on windows platform. Is it a bug? or feature? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 09 02:10:31 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2012 06:10:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So7B0-0007WT-K4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:10:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:47932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1So7Ax-0007WL-VN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:10:28 -0400 Received: from [155.69.17.56] (port=49727 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1So75t-0006nj-Oa for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:05:14 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: merge 9826 9551 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:05:08 +0800 Message-ID: <87pq85zcyz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) merge 9826 9551 thanks From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:15:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9551: 24.0.50; bold font overlapped on windows platform. Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kevin Yu Cc: 9551@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9551-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9551.15701199691280 (code B ref 9551); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 9551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 16:26:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3vc-0000KZ-Io for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:26:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:51408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3va-0000KQ-M9 for 9551@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:26:07 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3vX-0001HR-Ej; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:26:05 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:26:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Yu's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:46:00 +0800") Message-ID: <87r23thk2s.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Kevin Yu writes: > Some fonts have different font width between normal and bold face. > It seems like emacs assumes that they do have the same width on > windows platform. Is it a bug? or feature? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Kevin Yu writes: > Some fonts have different font width between normal and bold face. > It seems like emacs assumes that they do have the same width on > windows platform. Is it a bug? or feature? (I'm going through old Emacs bug reports that unfortunately got no response at the time.) If a bug is monospaced, then the bold version is supposed to be of the same width as the unbolded version. However, Emacs has support for variable-width fonts, so this should be no problem. Are you still seeing these overlapping fonts in modern Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 03 12:26:12 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 16:26:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3vf-0000Kp-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:26:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:51422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3ve-0000Kh-55 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:26:10 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG3vb-0001HZ-Hq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:26:09 +0200 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:26:07 +0200 Message-Id: <87pnjdhk2o.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #9551 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 9551 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 9551 + moreinfo quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 23:15:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9551: 24.0.50; bold font overlapped on windows platform. Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9551 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Kevin Yu Cc: 9551@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9551-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9551.157262548413200 (code B ref 9551); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 16:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 9551) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2019 16:24:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZj9-0003Qq-Uj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:24:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZj6-0003Qd-P0 for 9551@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:24:41 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZj1-0007pA-Eh; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:24:39 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87r23thk2s.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:24:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r23thk2s.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:26:03 +0200") Message-ID: <87wocjy37h.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Kevin Yu writes: > >> Some fonts have different font width between normal and bold face. >> It seems like emacs assumes that they do have the same width on >> windows platform. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Kevin Yu writes: > >> Some fonts have different font width between normal and bold face. >> It seems like emacs assumes that they do have the same width on >> windows platform. Is it a bug? or feature? > > (I'm going through old Emacs bug reports that unfortunately got no > response at the time.) > > If a bug is monospaced, then the bold version is supposed to be of the > same width as the unbolded version. However, Emacs has support for > variable-width fonts, so this should be no problem. > > Are you still seeing these overlapping fonts in modern Emacs versions? More information was requested a month ago, but none was given, so I'm closing this bug report. Please reopen if this is still an issue. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 12:24:47 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2019 16:24:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZjC-0003R5-Ai for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:24:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZjB-0003Qy-DN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:24:45 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQZj8-0007pO-Kh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:24:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:24:42 +0100 Message-Id: <87v9s3y379.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #9551 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 9551 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 9551 quit