Subject: bug#9478: 23.3; custom-save-all could be faster

From: Dave Abrahams <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:41:41 -0400

> Dave Abrahams <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> In the case where the file isn't already in a buffer, I suggest that
>> `custom-save-all' calls `find-file-noselect' with the RAWFILE argument
>> set to t
>
> That disables code conversion, which is wrong.

Okay, then maybe just the other part about find-file-hook :-)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com