Subject: Re: bug#9463: 24.0.50; Errors should not be continuable

From: Helmut Eller <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:49:10 +0200

* Stefan Monnier [2011-09-19 21:17] writes:

>> Incidentally, C-M-c does pretty much the same as what c does currently.
>
> It does something similar but not identical and hence re-introduces some
> of the problems that the change you don't like aimed to solve.

And what exactly is the difference between C-M-c and c?

> It's important to have a "c" that can "keep going (as much as possible)
> as if nothing happened".

And why was this not important in previous releases?

Helmut