GNU bug report logs -
#9455
RFE: split --balanced
Previous Next
Reported by: Dave Yost <Dave <at> Yost.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:02:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Fixed in version 8.8
Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Much better design. Thanks.
/ from my iPhone 4 /
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com> wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 01:55 AM, Dave Yost wrote:
>> Z% for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>> for> do echo $x ; done | split --lines=3 \
>> pipe> && for x in x?? ; do echo "=== $x" ; cat $x ; done
>> === xaa
>> 1
>> 2
>> 3
>> === xab
>> 4
>> 5
>> 6
>> === xac
>> 7
>>
>> In some applications, you would like split to more evenly apportion the output to the files, like this:
>>
>> Z% for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>> for> do echo $x ; done | split --balanced --lines=3 \
>> pipe> && for x in x?? ; do echo "=== $x" ; cat $x ; done
>> === xaa
>> 1
>> 2
>> 3
>> === xab
>> 4
>> 5
>> === xac
>> 6
>> 7
>>
>
> So you'd like to distribute evenly across the last 2 buckets.
> It seems like it would be more general to specify the number of buckets
> instead and let split balance across them all, which is supported recently.
>
> $ seq 7 | split -nr/3; tail x??
> ==> xaa <==
> 1
> 4
> 7
>
> ==> xab <==
> 2
> 5
>
> ==> xac <==
> 3
> 6
>
> $ seq 7 > 7; split -nl/3 7; tail x??
> ==> xaa <==
> 1
> 2
>
> ==> xab <==
> 3
> 4
>
> ==> xac <==
> 5
> 6
> 7
>
> Would that suffice?
>
> cheers,
> Pádraig.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 339 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.