From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:44:33 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#9395 <9395@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#9395 <9395@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] Reply-To: bug#9395 <9395@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 07:44:33 +0000 retitle 9395 [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] reassign 9395 gnus submitter 9395 Dave Abrahams severity 9395 wishlist tag 9395 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 14:07:21 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 18:07:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxjlR-0001bP-6X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:07:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxjlO-0001bE-QM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:07:20 -0400 Received: by pzk2 with SMTP id 2so6935015pzk.20 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.196.19 with SMTP id t19mr1871056wff.3.1314554660344; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.local (92-52-237-24.gci.net. [24.237.52.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i1sm14295560pbe.1.2011.08.28.11.04.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:04:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5CA5ED83AFA; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 10:04:18 -0800 (AKDT) From: Dave Abrahams To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) Subject: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] X-Debbugs-Version: 5.110018 X-Debbugs-Package: gnus Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 10:04:18 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) I just found this setting which I _almost_ love. The only problem with it is that when there's no attribution line for each and every cited section some of them disappear altogether, which can make it very confusing to read. I'd like it if I could always show at least one line, say, with an ellipsis to show that there's more. No Gnus v0.18 GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0 AppKit 1038.36) of 2011-07-31 on vulcan 200 Leafnode NNTP Daemon, version 1.11.8 running at localhost (my fqdn: pluto.boostpro.com) 500 Unknown command -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 04 10:35:11 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2011 14:35:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0Dmw-0000Lr-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:35:10 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0Dmu-0000LY-9U for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:35:08 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R0DjJ-0007JO-Ue; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:31:25 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sun, 28 Aug 2011 10:04:18 -0800") Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:28:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUOBw14b2cbFRgzLS6h l4zk4d7////+//4HAQVVTkqQoyGnAAACUklEQVQ4jZWTsW7bMBCGL9LCbKWjBOWmUh6szRZTwNpC +aSUYxrJhh8g8QtU9irUHeitlJyBb1sqDlrEcdD21yCAn+54uvsP1o+nBZvDe7Ve1ZvVar75DV4i 6nX9ra7qxeIYLDaLulpU1fwNKPOqdGR9DEo86PYIrBBp0D+XR+Ahf4nA+VGq6kVvqnr3B98CLpxS K621JkCJ9KACgHMBBBRAE1PayYZbos/DKyCebbVuFA+9vatZbm1KGiOuIO7SUGuthIixBzrSfhvP rkDJxiNaS8smDjClt/DjKxMFDKz7XjeSUiM/oVIkGp1lJL2FIGBca5CuHfLMAVdKXo54AS6vEZog RpSZHkTDRZU5MEEWG6Jd+r3a7qWKrLwsg7AAHwe7jviSIma7a6k8Pnm6m0EBEV74rEvcOUvDoVHe hV/Vg6YAKs2Yjz13HkV6t11G3SivxroAZbckHGmUnDdkly59wfOqJQUwqePMI3hDiCbnuPSNzXM+ KmCotBA0wWw7bckPlJFhB4Az16o+lSbZdEjtGaVVxaau7ckF6CYuA0J+fplQlXCOeefuAM1HumFl MPZgGkk3F8BL4qoKo84K33WGmZAIoTSkmFM6hwA/XkvDnOFazhODFE35hHIOlH24dvF3AQsobW0p kmRw3vqFi5h9VqF/HzlPJFwo6MejvxfQGTWUYXTPeQjguTue5XrlZrCXNlj2LhKcK86hV/HacBl3 xtw867VFM+48vT7h3ZuwOG3qG/hPsBonp/fjQZngeKMO2vxZKXh8R/8M1u+Bv6f6BV8qbKzJigtx AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway (1)_: "The Chamber Of 32 Doors" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R0DjJ-0007JO-Ue X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1315751486.09534@BJ4tHYLGdioMgAbdhS83rg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Dave Abrahams writes: > I just found this setting which I _almost_ love. The only problem with > it is that when there's no attribution line for each and every cited > section some of them disappear altogether, which can make it very > confusing to read. Do you have an example? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 04 11:13:39 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2011 15:13:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0EOA-0002Zi-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:13:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0EO8-0002Zc-7F for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:13:37 -0400 Received: by pzk2 with SMTP id 2so6357927pzk.20 for <9395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.35.193 with SMTP id k1mr5449461pbj.217.1315148999088; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 08:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.local (92-52-237-24.gci.net. [24.237.52.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f6sm14968558pbp.2.2011.09.04.08.09.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 04 Sep 2011 08:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id BCC69E11035; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 07:09:55 -0800 (AKDT) From: Dave Abrahams To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:09:55 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:28:47 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) on Sun Sep 04 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dave Abrahams writes: > >> I just found this setting which I _almost_ love. The only problem with >> it is that when there's no attribution line for each and every cited >> section some of them disappear altogether, which can make it very >> confusing to read. > > Do you have an example? Right now, no [I've switched to using `gnus-treat-hide-citation' instead because it has semantics closer to what I want.] I have seen numerous ones of the following form: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Joe Plotz said: > something he > said with which I disagree > some more that he said with which I also disagree --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- There was nothing indicating the presence of a citation after the first one. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 10 14:46:26 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2011 18:46:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2SZN-0000Nr-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:46:26 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2SZD-0000LD-0I for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:46:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2SV3-0003HA-FU; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:41:57 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:09:55 -0800") Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWYtKYNDhc+XH8UGy4l Nk8KBwsHAgS2QD4iAAACUElEQVQ4jVWTQZrbIAyF+egcoBSTtUs4QBnsWWdA7Z5x5H0W5v5H6BPB 7QyLOOhH0pMEKi3kZ62VUnpWn1cHXn+x+RN47XH6HyxmOj2UkBNcHW80A+QBxtKReVq3Drzy3p/g xXC96TeVaIBBdDHVzuqlg1l50B5Mh2JMFiUpd6CfQPugY5pF8TLOhixb77OKi+/AfwFhVsGL538g P7OnIaGDs4SbDoGeO2hcnubZ98qvlEnKhecScu8FpM9afUskmT2RmuYRifxtBsg9A4B9du/Xrdzw +Rl914RQ9jZc6BVKYyzGSn9IGTmoKZrXmNU1uii960BKD8wuu+oBJsqI5IsyFhP0jn+8OJ4o2SV1 uQLEBYP5yXwv7zn0OkJUJiUBk16Zt4gGSh0hGZWeAPNkrrHWCYFlJgCEJKsTwKbiHhClOADR2u0s H4SA3cj1IcrRJMs1Rd4PY8TuMHNaqKS3Y2/N4FAheFgTAXDaRLtu7g87txnHj2ojPHzI9I5oH/k3 7sqd296OilCIZyB0MV0wP9o+QBeFPGkpJdlYWQALwFoKMrt2h8KUylJikkEJKa0h9Ob6edRazYIm SkVNyAZNxslfFIPkAKvsmnXYLBRWSQIAl7cODLtq5Tb49QSXDiLXymxBrh3Af+8gwZrcUZf5ytyB aSNU3XxET2r8CpwASk78WVUzJLYDr3WS6bFo72AfYL9jsCUKaJ9Ac3vFXQjx6SHNPQFv8ozCKm1U aCS3E3zI5fN6vfCuZAgDXB7f+0vV63F0MOxtf9wzXpYKl+NwfwEfVM0+w/+lhAAAAABJRU5ErkJg gg== X-Now-Playing: Various's _Bustin' Out 1983: New Wave To New Beat Volume 3_: "New Order - Your Silent Face" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2SV3-0003HA-FU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316284917.57315@dILV3sl+shkJKSYucS+ukQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Dave Abrahams writes: >> Do you have an example? > > Right now, no [I've switched to using `gnus-treat-hide-citation' instead > because it has semantics closer to what I want.] I have seen numerous > ones of the following form: > Joe Plotz said: >> something he >> said > > with which I disagree > >> some more that he said > > with which I also disagree > There was nothing indicating the presence of a citation after the first > one. Do you have an example of a message that the commands hides improperly? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 05:10:28 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 09:10:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2g3X-00016G-ER for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:10:28 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2g3U-000167-7i for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:10:25 -0400 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so3418785vws.18 for <9395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.180.36 with SMTP id dl4mr804909vdc.195.1315731968726; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.local (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id by14sm8161795vdb.22.2011.09.11.02.06.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0723CE79905; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:06:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Abrahams To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:06:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:38:05 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) on Sat Sep 10 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dave Abrahams writes: > >>> Do you have an example? >> >> Right now, no [I've switched to using `gnus-treat-hide-citation' instead >> because it has semantics closer to what I want.] I have seen numerous >> ones of the following form: >> Joe Plotz said: >>> something he >>> said >> >> with which I disagree >> >>> some more that he said >> >> with which I also disagree >> There was nothing indicating the presence of a citation after the first >> one. > > Do you have an example of a message that the commands hides improperly? No, I'm afraid I don't have anything I can reproduce anymore. Might as well close this one; sorry for the noise. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 06:31:16 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 10:31:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2hJk-0007Dw-B1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:31:16 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2hJg-0007Dn-Lt for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:31:14 -0400 Received: by vxj14 with SMTP id 14so1086409vxj.3 for <9395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.70.106 with SMTP id l10mr1522776vdu.483.1315736817154; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.local (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bi11sm8255212vdb.13.2011.09.11.03.26.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A7DD3E7ABE3; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Abrahams To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:06:06 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) on Sun Sep 11 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: > No, I'm afraid I don't have anything I can reproduce anymore. Might as > well close this one; sorry for the noise. Belay that order! I have found an example for you, which I'll send to you directly because I'd like to get the other correspondent's permission before I make it completely public. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 11:28:38 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 15:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2lxV-0002Rj-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:28:37 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2lxT-0002RY-2U for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:28:36 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2ltD-0000Mr-Nm; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:24:11 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:26:55 -0400") Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVFAQVKQ0q1rbPr5+og Gh9mX2c4LzYeCg8cFRoZExdEPkQYEBVObJmEAAACZUlEQVQ4jW3Uv2vbQBQH8BuC2zEHiTG35YyW bpHoHsPVVZulNtwegiuDunSKBy8tHERq10J00RKRYBJlK0kc9f1zfe9OEvTH2/w+9+4r+85iRmVY cfZ3sX86PdR9bWa8K/EH3B30sIfAe1i+7uEeoaqF8HAR9XBMIDivKopYRV2IAINAfZIRRIddBCgP SLxaQtSF3LfAheCCf4eoCzkmSLEnsIbbddSGCChboJkR4IQP2WtyhKTyq5YrBB9yV2QI05raXJwT +JB3WUyQug9D2BJQiCiMQlAJjfDRak1w6H4oRWAc1J/WFO5Cbo2HaVrjFz8GByFCrBzQXhXfgAcM ETiwQHhWSVqLG+yXBAd8T6nEgZkmKb8tG1uOIykDfqOmSYLQmCM2qF+usBhj8lW1VImHAuHkBWMO 9FV6dNbBFzZgVIjsA0vYwAPYi887PewyxRgCniDAdrWz62cY27BzB8rDmd6/GpwQLN5i0sBDCfBV z7UWC62HSmXv66SHj1oHerbRs0Uc4znUbQaA1lri8v0h3XDFxcZnwANBoEV6E1uUStQtPCLMpZ5N F/kzwoTXGw9vHAQzFZcE33AvD9qDNjnQX8Nw7uGJQEupbekA76CHRx0Ecz2WQQNNVtgcQ4SD07mk CgMAjLC2uGzB92UkAQoqa/B4WbZ9ki2ECJklqThNPLYwDqHJrasJwfa0gwga187tJY9ZtpZdOQB8 KvuD4Ckc03IHuBytsGWF8DOMxlh0p8CWZdMg5BPMuA6jyPcRGsD7VeT5L5wYy1C2m0Fb1j7E/iWD l9gY1b+CjDLxf94+MUIc/wYlC6YCrvIGEQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Ikonika's _Contact, Love, Want, Have_: "Yoshimitsu" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1R2ltD-0000Mr-Nm X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1316359451.97626@rOl06SbFRdfbdjmSiO2haA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Dave Abrahams writes: > Belay that order! I have found an example for you, which I'll send to > you directly because I'd like to get the other correspondent's > permission before I make it completely public. Did you see the bug with -maybe or without? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 11 13:11:03 2011 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 17:11:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nYd-0001UM-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:11:03 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nYa-0001Tu-T9 for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:11:01 -0400 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so3671230vws.18 for <9395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.73.9 with SMTP id h9mr141425vdv.118.1315760803007; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto.luannocracy.com (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id by14sm8712096vdb.22.2011.09.11.10.06.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pluto.luannocracy.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id DF763E7D31D; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:06:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Abrahams To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:06:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:10:00 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) on Sun Sep 11 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dave Abrahams writes: > >> Belay that order! I have found an example for you, which I'll send to >> you directly because I'd like to get the other correspondent's >> permission before I make it completely public. > > Did you see the bug with -maybe or without? With -maybe. `gnus-treat-hide-citation-maybe' was t and `gnus-treat-hide-citation' was nil. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 25 16:57:24 2012 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2012 21:57:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TncV1-0002ua-Rw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:57:24 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41483) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TncUz-0002uT-3q for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:57:21 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TncUE-0000dS-IU; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:56:36 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:56:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:06:41 -0400") Message-ID: <87sj6tpzhs.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TncUE-0000dS-IU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357077396.72728@BA3gap6Cb9c1U3Qwgi5LMg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Dave Abrahams writes: >>> Belay that order! I have found an example for you, which I'll send to >>> you directly because I'd like to get the other correspondent's >>> permission before I make it completely public. >> >> Did you see the bug with -maybe or without? > > With -maybe. `gnus-treat-hide-citation-maybe' was t and > `gnus-treat-hide-citation' was nil. It's been a year since this. :-) Did you get the text that made the bug reproducible? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 25 21:03:54 2012 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 02:03:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TngLY-0001K9-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:03:53 -0500 Received: from mail-vb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:53224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TngLX-0001K2-5t for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:03:52 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p1so8507589vbi.32 for <9395@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:03:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=uC+po+VmS5knoLl9hfXPkO184q2RWKQz7UmobgfnI8M=; b=MLXfSyS3YGtju/5HopGBWoFQEU4GxwyROoif22Fk9lYK0V/zMVPg72EnGzANb1nD+G 0XWokkmpVyigH1bZR5U3pyNTJvQR/sHs5MCSK58rKFDZswHFQb/Qs7/oTcPD4aNJk6tQ 0SWcoRA+W0IoGO2Q+wdahPa2qLfkA1IC0Z/+KjIMjBLuod6rzT4tEVhBiBygaxcQjQac dSVGgaQ+q6eMVPxrXjyUrDG6SDdqZzGRx+O1yu68k4+/9hGZCPsiffiry4KczfbaTEm4 SBW8XOYo+f0wVumPmsYFf7Y96bp215AgohzgMZOL8N57xFRF8NMTQNKPI5blkhzsw/r+ 9IWw== X-Received: by 10.52.32.106 with SMTP id h10mr34556396vdi.1.1356487390474; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto.boostpro.com (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com. [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f13sm21186959vep.12.2012.12.25.18.03.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by pluto.boostpro.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5F3D29644AA; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:03:07 -0500 (EST) From: Dave Abrahams To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: <87sj6tpzhs.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:03:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sj6tpzhs.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:56:31 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn6tzOAUs0BV0hYSSSCCvAKPQ0QlRFzO0vyaVFub6JS+tC8EoCuWpbC4aJLLrjGmHnl1pjz X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) on Tue Dec 25 2012, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dave Abrahams writes: > >>>> Belay that order! I have found an example for you, which I'll send to >>>> you directly because I'd like to get the other correspondent's >>>> permission before I make it completely public. >>> >>> Did you see the bug with -maybe or without? >> >> With -maybe. `gnus-treat-hide-citation-maybe' was t and >> `gnus-treat-hide-citation' was nil. > > It's been a year since this. :-) Did you get the text that made the > bug reproducible? Yes, as noted in the thread I sent it to you privately because other correspondents were involved. I'll send it again. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing Software Development Training http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 26 08:42:11 2012 Received: (at 9395) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 13:42:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrFK-00033h-Oz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:42:11 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:59876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrFG-00033V-5p for 9395@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:42:07 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrET-00074s-4G; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:41:17 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dave Abrahams Subject: Re: bug#9395: [Feature Request] gnus-treat-hide-citation[-maybe] References: <87sj6tpzhs.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Winston Tong's _Theoretically Chinese_ Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:41:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Abrahams's message of "Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:03:07 -0500") Message-ID: <87623p53t3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnrET-00074s-4G X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357134078.07013@pAF67+hb8Nfnqol9/QiSEQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9395 Cc: 9395@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) I've now altered the -maybe function to use the non-maybe hiding logic. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 26 08:42:18 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2012 13:42:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrFR-000342-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:42:17 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:59882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrFP-00033v-9b for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:42:15 -0500 Received: from ip-90-20-179-93.dialup.ice.net ([93.179.20.90] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TnrEc-000757-IM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:41:26 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:41:22 +0100 Message-Id: <874nj953st.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #9395 X-MailScanner-ID: 1TnrEc-000757-IM X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1357134087.77465@OpS7wb450jhzYPzvgl90Cg X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) tags 9395 fixed close 9395 24.4 From unknown Tue Sep 09 00:44:33 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator