From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131453836621139 (code B ref -1); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:33:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 13:32:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfTi-0005Ut-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:32:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfTf-0005Ui-DK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:32:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQo-0003nM-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:59085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQo-0003nI-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQn-0007Xq-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQm-0003mr-7v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:59707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQm-0003mj-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:44 -0400 Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so2991110yib.0 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3UmzZluqQhKTPWsxUgw0YL0504BDfdwZfFjeEhZNp7c=; b=xZ3MxP8BKyltkBspOQHPxKMgf9oBCjW9heWC743x866/ifxBZU2VKKmjBbx49N7twH V9d+gDmvbx0ifil5w2PrPKML9jd0IM5Mb2U2LC3oiDwxA2nMWb2925qO05JOfi7r7dAd FHy4Bc7FmwUtRcVivDhN7xnC/AnTNWocHcwfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.115.98 with SMTP id d62mr18707355yhh.70.1314538182917; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:29:42 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) tags: patch In info node "(elisp)Building Lists", I've found a small error, which is fixed by the below patch. === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-28 13:15:35 +0000 @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ @end group @group (setq l (make-list 3 '(a b)) - @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b)) + @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b))) (eq (car l) (cadr l)) @result{} t @end group -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.131453932525743 (code B ref 9393); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 13:48:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfjB-0006h9-1B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:48:45 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxfj8-0006h2-Sm for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:48:43 -0400 Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so3759837gwb.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4ZNkE38oSewu+BrKsZB7w6TL6j862Dy3u7fVrYb40s0=; b=oe68/ehkj+bjmviZWmrHIdEF4CqM50dCjwagVOlCJnN/CcP2D3Ws/lPi9JP/RBzPw3 xjP+aeeK3FnO0wjiDyv/KvMR7W9XHhrq9K6gG0ZZMkysK5ThxBtwJF6Nvv68IafULgjh WtuqBEECgIF7R9VJunWPCnH7bIR20WeZt9CvQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.116.73 with SMTP id f49mr4402147yhh.87.1314539146243; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:45:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Sorry, the previous patch is obviously wrong. This is the right one: === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-28 13:43:12 +0000 @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ @result{} nil @end group @group -(setq l (make-list 3 '(a b)) +(setq l (make-list 3 '(a b))) @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b)) (eq (car l) (cadr l)) @result{} t -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Dani Moncayo Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.131455871225683 (code B ref 9393); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 19:11:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxklr-0006gA-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:11:52 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxklo-0006g0-LJ for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:11:49 -0400 Received: from furball ([128.36.225.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7SJ8oHc025988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:08:51 -0400 From: Chong Yidong References: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:08:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:45:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87pqjpwdz1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Dani Moncayo writes: > Sorry, the previous patch is obviously wrong. This is the right one: Thanks, applied. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 15:12:05 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 19:12:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxkm4-0006hA-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:12:04 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxkm2-0006gi-3h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:12:02 -0400 Received: from furball ([128.36.225.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7SJ94NJ031755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:09:04 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 9393 Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:09:03 -0400 Message-ID: <87mxetpd4g.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 9393 thanks From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Chong Yidong Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.13150354363713 (code B ref 9393); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2011 07:37:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzkmx-0000xp-Cv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:37:16 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzkmu-0000xh-Ck for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:37:13 -0400 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so2341634gxk.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qfKRMTThedazK8yP3yMNfxiiNayGIF7lInW7rl4icPI=; b=UufSEmq+QSVCFvZ6Zm8+0qayLNkHX4NH5YKApIJ4nFQOGiXB4+o1gPZGjL+L8VNMa5 WEMHkdQPODKPqIUJygekiiarK4aAwpVlG6TpCIU2F2yxPyJ54bcdwFINxL861rKbwbKd KchLH/zcpUexreAFKmkdCbiPoH05kwzvSbJdI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.22.33 with SMTP id s21mr5809676yhs.70.1315035223070; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:33:43 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) I think I've found another typo in node "(elisp)Sets And Lists": === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-29 15:45:15 +0000 @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ l @result{} ((2) (1)) ;; @r{If you want to change @code{l} reliably,} -;; @r{write @code{(setq l (delete elt l))}.} +;; @r{write @code{(setq l (delete '(2) l))}.} @end group @group (setq l '((2) (1) (2))) In the example at hand `elt' is unknown, so that `(setq l (delete elt l))' has no sense and raises an error. -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Dani Moncayo Cc: Chong Yidong , 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.13159834613260 (code B ref 9393); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2011 06:57:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jPd-0000qU-U9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:57:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jPb-0000qM-57 for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:57:36 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jLB-0002VQ-DR; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:53:01 -0400 From: Glenn Morris References: X-Spook: Treasury Putin Mafia Serbian Craig Livingstone doctrine X-Ran: *g]b.C5&/l8dFWQ&6B0-E!HlvMA>sH`";iIgHHnGnu'v+BlafRD~$\\Zx\ezr[`giXUy!L X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:53:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:33:43 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Thanks; applied. From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 09:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.13175463353534 (code B ref 9393); Sun, 02 Oct 2011 09:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2011 09:05:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAHzL-0000uw-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:05:35 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAHzH-0000un-6o for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:05:32 -0400 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2615977gyd.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GQnp72M9axLSHaqQYg94cgvuoV57tXtX4+EvKHWnbWk=; b=Py0ZQ7gmv9SII3A/jYhxVE0c/EGuLB36SlOu/JS/geqoCczkbSpdmwk9uiEsqSEJ/5 rvWkWZgC04Dq0jrE7cCPDkKx1QRpIRqvy2q1aXoGbdWOIN+zoDMsHCRRE7RMP6+bloRW moG0qHmaeSR0eBjNAdeR0tR6CfJr8A2XUp7+w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.191.101 with SMTP id f65mr82612368yhn.61.1317546254265; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.6 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:04:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Hi, Info node "(elisp)Advising Functions" begins with: > The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a > function, by "advising the function". Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after "lets you add". For example: "... lets you add code to the existing ..." -- Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Dani Moncayo Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.131757975422456 (code B ref 9393); Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2011 18:22:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQgL-0005q9-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:22:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQgI-0005q1-Nw for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:22:32 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQf0-00077e-Re; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:21:10 -0400 From: Glenn Morris References: X-Spook: advisors JUWTF Forte MILSATCOM RSA InfoSec red noise DES X-Ran: ^4M3@UH|su)W[4OItIOL@QeROh)Kjp~Iv8N6eW8'R@0AK6L?Rj;nhKPgB^sM2jB#`tm{,X X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:21:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:04:14 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Dani Moncayo wrote: >> The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a >> function, by "advising the function". > > Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), > but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after > "lets you add". For example: "... lets you add code to the existing > ..." The current wording seems fine to me. The OED says that "add" can be used intransitively with "to", in the sense of "making something more extensive". From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual Resent-From: Dani Moncayo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Glenn Morris Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9393.131762337224850 (code B ref 9393); Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2011 06:29:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAc1q-0006Sj-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAc1o-0006Sb-8E for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:29:29 -0400 Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so515500ywm.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IOl+OG5mqgL5wqHgbH67TZAV69XjBOsg16M4hMQNiDI=; b=cM/mJOD2J58za1drTmRJt7VgtaQIQpBsD5Q/B9YvlfVJqz4TGhhRl3UwCsaG7Xx5lV zby27Euz4e0sks4I0BwCTqsYmqmiPbF0xx58RmsI2AAukNdMtrPsP2hrT2GFyIXOwQxr +xWFlbKpA7SnZy/U2P1HDZ6mY29X0PZnL+H2A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.156.67 with SMTP id l43mr67746087yhk.10.1317623285781; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.6 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:28:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) >>> The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a >>> function, by "advising the function". >> >> Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), >> but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after >> "lets you add". =A0For example: "... lets you add code to the existing >> ..." > > The current wording seems fine to me. The OED says that "add" can be > used intransitively with "to", in the sense of "making something more > extensive". Thanks Glenn, noted. [This report is already closed, so there's nothing else to do.] --=20 Dani Moncayo