From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 09:32:46 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 13:32:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfTi-0005Ut-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:32:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfTf-0005Ui-DK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:32:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQo-0003nM-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:59085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQo-0003nI-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQn-0007Xq-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQm-0003mr-7v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:59707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfQm-0003mj-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:29:44 -0400 Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so2991110yib.0 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3UmzZluqQhKTPWsxUgw0YL0504BDfdwZfFjeEhZNp7c=; b=xZ3MxP8BKyltkBspOQHPxKMgf9oBCjW9heWC743x866/ifxBZU2VKKmjBbx49N7twH V9d+gDmvbx0ifil5w2PrPKML9jd0IM5Mb2U2LC3oiDwxA2nMWb2925qO05JOfi7r7dAd FHy4Bc7FmwUtRcVivDhN7xnC/AnTNWocHcwfw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.115.98 with SMTP id d62mr18707355yhh.70.1314538182917; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:29:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" From: Dani Moncayo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) tags: patch In info node "(elisp)Building Lists", I've found a small error, which is fixed by the below patch. === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-28 13:15:35 +0000 @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ @end group @group (setq l (make-list 3 '(a b)) - @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b)) + @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b))) (eq (car l) (cadr l)) @result{} t @end group -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 09:48:45 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 13:48:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QxfjB-0006h9-1B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:48:45 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxfj8-0006h2-Sm for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:48:43 -0400 Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so3759837gwb.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4ZNkE38oSewu+BrKsZB7w6TL6j862Dy3u7fVrYb40s0=; b=oe68/ehkj+bjmviZWmrHIdEF4CqM50dCjwagVOlCJnN/CcP2D3Ws/lPi9JP/RBzPw3 xjP+aeeK3FnO0wjiDyv/KvMR7W9XHhrq9K6gG0ZZMkysK5ThxBtwJF6Nvv68IafULgjh WtuqBEECgIF7R9VJunWPCnH7bIR20WeZt9CvQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.116.73 with SMTP id f49mr4402147yhh.87.1314539146243; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:45:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" From: Dani Moncayo To: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Sorry, the previous patch is obviously wrong. This is the right one: === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-28 13:43:12 +0000 @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ @result{} nil @end group @group -(setq l (make-list 3 '(a b)) +(setq l (make-list 3 '(a b))) @result{} ((a b) (a b) (a b)) (eq (car l) (cadr l)) @result{} t -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 15:11:52 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 19:11:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxklr-0006gA-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:11:52 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxklo-0006g0-LJ for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:11:49 -0400 Received: from furball ([128.36.225.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7SJ8oHc025988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:08:51 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Tiny bug in info node "(elisp)Building Lists" References: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:08:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:45:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87pqjpwdz1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Dani Moncayo writes: > Sorry, the previous patch is obviously wrong. This is the right one: Thanks, applied. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 28 15:12:05 2011 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2011 19:12:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxkm4-0006hA-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:12:04 -0400 Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qxkm2-0006gi-3h for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:12:02 -0400 Received: from furball ([128.36.225.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7SJ94NJ031755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:09:04 -0400 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 9393 Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:09:03 -0400 Message-ID: <87mxetpd4g.fsf@stupidchicken.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) close 9393 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 03 03:37:16 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2011 07:37:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzkmx-0000xp-Cv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:37:16 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzkmu-0000xh-Ck for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:37:13 -0400 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so2341634gxk.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qfKRMTThedazK8yP3yMNfxiiNayGIF7lInW7rl4icPI=; b=UufSEmq+QSVCFvZ6Zm8+0qayLNkHX4NH5YKApIJ4nFQOGiXB4+o1gPZGjL+L8VNMa5 WEMHkdQPODKPqIUJygekiiarK4aAwpVlG6TpCIU2F2yxPyJ54bcdwFINxL861rKbwbKd KchLH/zcpUexreAFKmkdCbiPoH05kwzvSbJdI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.22.33 with SMTP id s21mr5809676yhs.70.1315035223070; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.43.131 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:33:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual From: Dani Moncayo To: Chong Yidong Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) I think I've found another typo in node "(elisp)Sets And Lists": === modified file 'doc/lispref/lists.texi' --- doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-05-29 22:41:06 +0000 +++ doc/lispref/lists.texi 2011-08-29 15:45:15 +0000 @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ l @result{} ((2) (1)) ;; @r{If you want to change @code{l} reliably,} -;; @r{write @code{(setq l (delete elt l))}.} +;; @r{write @code{(setq l (delete '(2) l))}.} @end group @group (setq l '((2) (1) (2))) In the example at hand `elt' is unknown, so that `(setq l (delete elt l))' has no sense and raises an error. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 14 02:57:41 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2011 06:57:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jPd-0000qU-U9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:57:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jPb-0000qM-57 for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:57:36 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3jLB-0002VQ-DR; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:53:01 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual References: X-Spook: Treasury Putin Mafia Serbian Craig Livingstone doctrine X-Ran: *g]b.C5&/l8dFWQ&6B0-E!HlvMA>sH`";iIgHHnGnu'v+BlafRD~$\\Zx\ezr[`giXUy!L X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:53:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:33:43 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 Cc: Chong Yidong , 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Thanks; applied. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 02 05:05:35 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2011 09:05:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAHzL-0000uw-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:05:35 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAHzH-0000un-6o for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:05:32 -0400 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2615977gyd.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GQnp72M9axLSHaqQYg94cgvuoV57tXtX4+EvKHWnbWk=; b=Py0ZQ7gmv9SII3A/jYhxVE0c/EGuLB36SlOu/JS/geqoCczkbSpdmwk9uiEsqSEJ/5 rvWkWZgC04Dq0jrE7cCPDkKx1QRpIRqvy2q1aXoGbdWOIN+zoDMsHCRRE7RMP6+bloRW moG0qHmaeSR0eBjNAdeR0tR6CfJr8A2XUp7+w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.191.101 with SMTP id f65mr82612368yhn.61.1317546254265; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.6 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 02:04:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:04:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual From: Dani Moncayo To: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Hi, Info node "(elisp)Advising Functions" begins with: > The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a > function, by "advising the function". Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after "lets you add". For example: "... lets you add code to the existing ..." -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 02 14:22:34 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2011 18:22:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQgL-0005q9-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:22:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQgI-0005q1-Nw for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:22:32 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RAQf0-00077e-Re; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:21:10 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual References: X-Spook: advisors JUWTF Forte MILSATCOM RSA InfoSec red noise DES X-Ran: ^4M3@UH|su)W[4OItIOL@QeROh)Kjp~Iv8N6eW8'R@0AK6L?Rj;nhKPgB^sM2jB#`tm{,X X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:21:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:04:14 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Dani Moncayo wrote: >> The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a >> function, by "advising the function". > > Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), > but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after > "lets you add". For example: "... lets you add code to the existing > ..." The current wording seems fine to me. The OED says that "add" can be used intransitively with "to", in the sense of "making something more extensive". From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 03 02:29:32 2011 Received: (at 9393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2011 06:29:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAc1q-0006Sj-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAc1o-0006Sb-8E for 9393@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:29:29 -0400 Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so515500ywm.3 for <9393@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IOl+OG5mqgL5wqHgbH67TZAV69XjBOsg16M4hMQNiDI=; b=cM/mJOD2J58za1drTmRJt7VgtaQIQpBsD5Q/B9YvlfVJqz4TGhhRl3UwCsaG7Xx5lV zby27Euz4e0sks4I0BwCTqsYmqmiPbF0xx58RmsI2AAukNdMtrPsP2hrT2GFyIXOwQxr +xWFlbKpA7SnZy/U2P1HDZ6mY29X0PZnL+H2A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.156.67 with SMTP id l43mr67746087yhk.10.1317623285781; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.207.6 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:28:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#9393: 24.0.50; Typo in Elisp manual From: Dani Moncayo To: Glenn Morris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9393 Cc: 9393@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) >>> The "advice" feature lets you add to the existing definition of a >>> function, by "advising the function". >> >> Please, correct me if I'm wrong (English is not my first language), >> but I think that this sentence is lacking a substantive just after >> "lets you add". =A0For example: "... lets you add code to the existing >> ..." > > The current wording seems fine to me. The OED says that "add" can be > used intransitively with "to", in the sense of "making something more > extensive". Thanks Glenn, noted. [This report is already closed, so there's nothing else to do.] --=20 Dani Moncayo From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator