GNU bug report logs - #9362
24.0.50; Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions listing on Windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:20:04 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 9362 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 9362 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9362; Package emacs. (Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:20:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:20:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.0.50; Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions listing on Windows
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:05:02 -0700
emacs -Q
 
I see no explanation in the Emacs manual (for Dired) or in the Elisp
manual (wrt file attributes or somewhere else) about what `ls' (hence
Dired) lists wrt file permissions on Windows.
 
The doc string of `file-attributes' is also pretty silent about this -
it says simply "file modes" (doesn't even use the word "permissions").
 
Some explanation should be given about permissions.  I'm using FAT32,
for instance, and I see `x' for all directories and for no files.
`chmod' with `+x' or `-x' has no effect, and with no message.  No doubt
this is due to Windows not supporting this.  But that should be
explained - documented.
 
In Dired we show some permissions that apparently have no real meaning
on Windows (FAT, at least), and we provide a command (`chmod') which on
Windows does not do everything its doc says.  OK, I'm using Cygwin for
the UNIX `chmod', but regardless, there should be some explanation of
these things in the manual(s).
 

In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2011-08-22 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt'
 





Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9362; Package emacs. (Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:24:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 24.0.50;
	Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions listing on Windows
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:12:44 +0200
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:

> Some explanation should be given about permissions.  I'm using FAT32,
> for instance, and I see `x' for all directories and for no files.
> `chmod' with `+x' or `-x' has no effect, and with no message.  No doubt
> this is due to Windows not supporting this.  But that should be
> explained - documented.

Isn't explaining how file permissions on various file systems kinda
beyond the scope of the Emacs manual?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9362; Package emacs. (Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:30:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#9362: 24.0.50; Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions
	listing on Windows
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:25:22 +0200
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 04:12, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote:
> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
>
>> Some explanation should be given about permissions.  I'm using FAT32,
>> for instance, and I see `x' for all directories and for no files.
>> `chmod' with `+x' or `-x' has no effect, and with no message.  No doubt
>> this is due to Windows not supporting this.  But that should be
>> explained - documented.
>
> Isn't explaining how file permissions on various file systems kinda
> beyond the scope of the Emacs manual?

Isn't this is about what Emacs does, not about the various file systems?




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9362; Package emacs. (Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:49:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Lennart Borgman'" <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>,
	"'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#9362: 24.0.50;
	Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions listing on Windows
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 07:44:08 -0700
> > Isn't explaining how file permissions on various file systems kinda
> > beyond the scope of the Emacs manual?
> 
> Isn't this is about what Emacs does, not about the various 
> file systems?

Exactly.  The _Emacs_ `ls' command is not sufficiently documented.  In
particular, what it does on Windows is special and needs to be described.
Otherwise the output is meaningless to users.  `ls' is an Emacs command.  No
outside doc for Windows will tell a user what it does. Likewise, `dired'.





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#9362; Package emacs. (Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#9362: 24.0.50;
 Explain in manual(s) Dired/ls permissions listing on Windows
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:14:42 +0200
Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 04:12, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote:
>> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
>>
>>> Some explanation should be given about permissions.  I'm using FAT32,
>>> for instance, and I see `x' for all directories and for no files.
>>> `chmod' with `+x' or `-x' has no effect, and with no message.  No doubt
>>> this is due to Windows not supporting this.  But that should be
>>> explained - documented.
>>
>> Isn't explaining how file permissions on various file systems kinda
>> beyond the scope of the Emacs manual?
>
> Isn't this is about what Emacs does, not about the various file systems?

Emacs displays this OS-specific information, sure, but I still think
this is beyond the scope of Emacs documentation.  Closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




Added tag(s) wontfix. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:16:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug closed, send any further explanations to 9362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:16:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 26 May 2016 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 9 years and 27 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.