From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:17:50 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#9360 <9360@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#9360 <9360@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-mode Reply-To: bug#9360 <9360@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:17:50 +0000 retitle 9360 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-= mode reassign 9360 emacs submitter 9360 Seweryn Kokot severity 9360 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 24 12:01:40 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2011 16:01:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwFtb-0007Sr-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:01:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDFf-0003u1-0m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:12:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDDA-0008UZ-I4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:09:41 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:43443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDDA-0008UV-GM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:09:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDD9-0002yk-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:09:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDD8-0008UB-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:09:39 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:34802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwDD7-0008Tt-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:09:38 -0400 Received: by iyn15 with SMTP id 15so1729641iyn.6 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9T1zxw4nwjCVZvHYzl2YVmesiK+FtrS5J0ta4Zw05ME=; b=mk6PaTbFSBlv53DLBP+EbC0gA7HBRkgOnZKBJX3Frg4mEjG1zpVKJ4fzdaT29pEKB3 VJcRDCnD7aAKv9OIVaZYSR5NigkXr3NzXxCjz7JhSdhjCO4Z2oeTtqhB9JY0i2QiIVyl ho2RIlvW4uO5Bl7GJQcWaRe4BNJfQJ3UzR4f8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.27.233 with SMTP id j41mr9996433ibc.77.1314191376671; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.169.83 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-mode From: Seweryn Kokot To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:01:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) When in a buffer in emacs-lisp-mode, emacs 24 neglects emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table. It uses lisp-mode-abbrev-table only. I think the elisp manual should tell us more about the difference between the three lisp abbrev tables: emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table, lisp-interaction-mode-abbrev-table and lisp-mode-abbrev-table. I add that in emacs 23 emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table worked was taken into account when in emacs-lisp-mode buffer. In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-08-22 on 3249CTO Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENG value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: x r e p o r t Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort gnus-util mail-extr message format-spec rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mailabbrev mail-utils gmm-utils mailheader emacsbug time-date tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer button faces cus-face files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 24 16:24:24 2011 Received: (at 9360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2011 20:24:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwJzr-0008AH-LW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:24:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwJzp-0008AA-Af for 9360@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:24:22 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53404) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwJxK-00048D-4N; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:21:46 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Seweryn Kokot Subject: Re: bug#9360: 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-mode References: X-Spook: argus benelux ISEC Kosovo Centro CIA satellite imagery X-Ran: @1hiFKouS2sgQ7-`(}?ieui\KY:nXA72r0yv06Y7`C2e7P)ls.vNp"WO)4&&!j9&Uz7T/S X-Hue: white X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:21:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Seweryn Kokot's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:09:36 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9360 Cc: 9360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) Seweryn Kokot wrote: > When in a buffer in emacs-lisp-mode, emacs 24 neglects > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table. It uses lisp-mode-abbrev-table only. I > think the elisp manual should tell us more about the difference between > the three lisp abbrev tables: > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table, lisp-interaction-mode-abbrev-table and > lisp-mode-abbrev-table. I add that in emacs 23 > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table worked was taken into account when in > emacs-lisp-mode buffer. I don't see that emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table has ever had an effect. In 23.1 it is void. In 23.2 and on it is defined (by define-derived-mode) but not used. `add-mode-abbrev' in an Emacs Lisp mode buffer adds to lisp-mode-abbrev-table. Adding an entry to emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table in abbrev_defs has no effect. This is because emacs-lisp-mode calls lisp-mode-variables, which explicitly sets the abbrev-table to lisp-mode-abbrev-table. To me, the bug looks like the fact that emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table is defined at all. If it's never going to be used, the definition of emacs-lisp-mode should specify an :abbrev-table. > In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2011-08-22 on 3249CTO From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 25 02:30:41 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2011 06:30:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTSZ-0007lQ-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:30:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTRp-00072G-TZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:29:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPH-0001IQ-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:27:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:33756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPH-0001IM-At for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:27:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPF-0003Kv-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:27:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPE-0001IA-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:27:13 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPE-0001I6-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:27:12 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTPC-0004k7-QD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:27:10 +0200 Received: from 139.191.131.39 ([139.191.131.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:27:10 +0200 Received: from sewkokot by 139.191.131.39 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:27:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Seweryn Kokot Subject: Re: bug#9360: =?utf-8?b?MjQuMC41MDsJZW1hY3MtbGlzcC1tb2RlLWFiYnJldi10YWJsZQ==?= neglected in emacs-lisp-mode Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 139.191.131.39 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:30:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) Glenn Morris gnu.org> writes: > > Seweryn Kokot wrote: > > > When in a buffer in emacs-lisp-mode, emacs 24 neglects > > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table. It uses lisp-mode-abbrev-table only. I > > think the elisp manual should tell us more about the difference between > > the three lisp abbrev tables: > > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table, lisp-interaction-mode-abbrev-table and > > lisp-mode-abbrev-table. I add that in emacs 23 > > emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table worked was taken into account when in > > emacs-lisp-mode buffer. > > I don't see that emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table has ever had an effect. > In 23.1 it is void. In 23.2 and on it is defined (by define-derived-mode) > but not used. `add-mode-abbrev' in an Emacs Lisp mode buffer adds to > lisp-mode-abbrev-table. Adding an entry to emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table > in abbrev_defs has no effect. > > This is because emacs-lisp-mode calls lisp-mode-variables, which > explicitly sets the abbrev-table to lisp-mode-abbrev-table. > > To me, the bug looks like the fact that emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table is > defined at all. If it's never going to be used, the definition of > emacs-lisp-mode should specify an :abbrev-table. I'm using msf-abbrev [1] library which uses emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table for emacs-lisp-mode and this mechanism worked in emacs 23.2 and not in emacs 24.0.50. Now I modified msf-abbrev settings to use lisp-mode-abbrev-table but in fact it can be misleading to see emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table not working with emacs-lisp-mode. It's better to remove this table or explain how to use this abbrev table in emacs and elisp manuals. Thanks, Regards, Seweryn [1] http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/MsfAbbrev > > > In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > > of 2011-08-22 on 3249CTO > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 26 22:36:18 2011 Received: (at 9360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2011 02:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qx8ks-0002TR-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:36:18 -0400 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qx8kp-0002TG-Gy for 9360@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:36:16 -0400 Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7R2XIqa021901; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:33:21 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7C568660CF; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:33:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Seweryn Kokot Subject: Re: bug#9360: 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-mode Message-ID: References: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:33:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Seweryn Kokot's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:26:56 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV3961=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3961> : streams <675494> : uri <944401> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9360 Cc: 9360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) > in fact it can be misleading to see emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table not working > with emacs-lisp-mode. It's better to remove this table or explain how to use > this abbrev table in emacs and elisp manuals. The right thing to do is to make emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table work in emacs-lisp-mode. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 28 23:49:15 2012 Received: (at 9360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 04:49:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhX-0003fS-AL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54457 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhV-0003fL-D0 for 9360@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:14 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:46480 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhS-0001Zy-Iq; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:11 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#9360: 24.0.50; emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table neglected in emacs-lisp-mode References: Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:49:02 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:33:15 -0400") Message-ID: <877h0bdsg1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 9360 Cc: Seweryn Kokot , 9360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Stefan Monnier writes: >> in fact it can be misleading to see emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table not working >> with emacs-lisp-mode. It's better to remove this table or explain how to use >> this abbrev table in emacs and elisp manuals. > > The right thing to do is to make emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table work in > emacs-lisp-mode. I've checked in a fix. Note that emacs-lisp-mode-abbrev-table now takes lisp-mode-abbrev-table as its parent, in order for existing abbrevs to continue working. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 28 23:49:32 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 04:49:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhn-0003fy-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:32 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54474 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhm-0003fs-EU for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:30 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:46481 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrMhk-0001bM-2M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:49:28 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 9360 Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:49:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87bopn5d0u.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 9360 thanks From unknown Wed Aug 20 01:17:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator