Subject: bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:57:34 +0200

Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]> writes:

> Exactly.  Saying "(must include -l)" is simple and clear, and fully
> correct.

No, because it doesn't have to include -l.  -o and -g does not imply -l.
It's kinda like -l, though.

So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/