GNU bug report logs - #9300
24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING

Previous Next

Full log

Message #56 received at 9300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>, 9300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: f92capac <at> gmail.com, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil
 when just after THING
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:53:42 +0300

On 06/20/2016 12:21 PM, Tino Calancha wrote:

> * I agree with Drew that there is neither sexp nor list at point,
>   so i would expect I), II), III) and IV) returning nil.

It's a matter of definition. If we say there is, then there is. We could 
also add a variable, of course.

> * I) and II) agree

Do they?

> but III) and IV disagree.
>   I would expect III) and IV) returning the same value.

Agree. But will you be satisfied if they both return "(foo bar)"?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.