GNU bug report logs - #9300
24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
To: 9300 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: f92capac <at> gmail.com, drew.adams <at> oracle.com, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:21:09 +0900

Consider following code:


emacs -Q:

C-x b foo RET
M-: (insert "(foo bar)")

I)
M-: (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'sexp) RET
=> (1 . 10)
II)
M-: (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'list) RET
=> (10 . 10)
III)
M-: (thing-at-point 'sexp) RET
=> "(foo bar)"
IV)
M-: (thing-at-point 'list) RET
=> ""


V)
M-: (save-excursion (goto-char 1) (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'list)) RET
=> (1 . 10)
VI)
M-: (save-excursion (goto-char 1) (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'sexp)) RET
=> (1 . 10)


* I agree with Drew that there is neither sexp nor list at point,
  so i would expect I), II), III) and IV) returning nil.

* Both function names, i.e., functions at I) and III), and their doc strings
  looks clear: return THING at point (III) or return the locations
  of THING at point.  If there is no such THING at point i would expect
  both return nil: IMO that would be more consistent/intuitive with the 
func.
  names and doc strings.

* I) and II) agree but III) and IV disagree.
  I would expect III) and IV) returning the same value.


In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.20.6)
Repository revision: 9341142dc876f4d93c442242206a7d2d40fd03af

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.