GNU bug report logs -
#9300
24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:39:03 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.0.50
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 23.02.2016 07:37, Drew Adams wrote:
>> I'm not sure it should be fixed. Your reasoning seems valid,
>> however by now this behavior is ingrained into my expectations
>> of how thing-at-point should behave.
>>
>> This would be a breaking change. For instance, it will make
>> (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'symbol) unsuitable for use in a
>> completion-at-point-functions element,
> Why do you think so? Have you tried it? It does not affect
> the behavior for THING = `symbol' at all.
>
>> to compute the first two values of the returned list, because
>> during completion you're most often "after" the symbol.
> So? Not a problem. Put point after a symbol - you get the
> same answer as now.
>
>> And I do use it for that purpose in one third-party package.
>>
>> emacs-eclim also uses it in
>> eclim-java-show-documentation-for-current-element. At the
>> very least, this will change the existing behavior.
> This is the design of the thingatpt code, and the reason why
> `<=' instead of `<' is a bug:
>
> the function that is (get THING 'end-op) moves PAST the THING,
> so that point is not on the THING. This is true generally, no
> matter the type of THING.
>
>
>
That what I changed at
https://github.com/andreas-roehler/thing-at-point-utils
ar-forward-list-atpt would stop at closing paren, not one char after as
forward-sexp would do.
Char after FORM in not considered inside in sense of at-point.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 30 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.