From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131324070925104 (code B ref -1); Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:06:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Aug 2011 13:05:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDtj-0006Wo-Jm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:05:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDtf-0006Wg-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:05:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDsC-0006g2-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:48041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDsC-0006fy-2I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDsB-0006eb-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDsA-0006fh-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:31 -0400 Received: from mailbigip.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.5]:42112 helo=homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsDsA-0006fd-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:30 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF2951C062 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=pBBXJ91uNrXBF3J3bS6dfXarHZ2EyxB0FUcQwHBytE5enXI5hpOow4FLKfhU BFJmdMJMxsRlvC39J5KowL8T8+cH385jFrYgsYT1t3EXs/TZqZ8lEMU59EfKCnGJ Jc8DaiJTExgUy2MbF/scQ6ML300VutL3egDqys8/TuZdMtI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=gJ9N7/dSsiWKyNGbCmvxjjuoVV8=; b=a/zx9vZ9iuXhLYAA h29ucS6JnrBSr7Ta0tZn5C9SQM/M2FJsGxbXWA09cvaAyFpFUJeI+H0m53UqIJ09 oQn9f5Cz2Jc8/25oGaCiYxijcftvgmGMZvcJ2XvPu2OgCESOSwyr81mae561N+xw 1N0Q7rIyLP2Ev6Lzzz95nfbRams= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-6-126.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.6.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BA3251C05F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:03:27 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:03:25 +0800 Message-ID: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) Shadowed by what? e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) C-d tar-flag-deleted RET tar-extract (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) C-n tar-next-line C-p tar-previous-line SPC tar-next-line (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) Say what mode on each of such lines! From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: jidanni@jidanni.org Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.13140487262023 (code B ref 9293); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2011 21:32:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvc6H-0000WY-Hr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:32:05 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvc6G-0000WP-CX; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:32:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlAGAIjJUk5Ld+HZ/2dsb2JhbABBmQCPFniBQAEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNiCi1UoZIBJ9xhDY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,265,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="132236531" Received: from 75-119-225-217.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([75.119.225.217]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Aug 2011 17:29:40 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C394D6610A; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:29:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier Message-ID: References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:29:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:03:25 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) severity 9293 wishlist thanks > Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) > Shadowed by what? > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) > C-d tar-flag-deleted > RET tar-extract > (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) > C-n tar-next-line > C-p tar-previous-line > SPC tar-next-line > (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) > Say what mode on each of such lines! That would be nice, indeed. In this case, I can guess it's the view-mode bindings, probably because you used `v' from dired to visit that file. Stefan From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.13140496306068 (code B ref 9293); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2011 21:47:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvcKr-0001Zo-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:47:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvcKp-0001Zg-Pc for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:47:08 -0400 Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so3606701eyz.21 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:44:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UWKlBTgfslRilfbfKUv8wx/1Iz+37yg37vpyINQTJ4E=; b=BIEO2EhpBL6HtpmrVEwcSxY2/Or/lktbBq25b/H38OemEMjznKV3wj8fFf3lup6n7/ kfotb5rrnYFcteov4G0DMofB4PBwjvqYAwpkCEHDQUJfrPDcTXDZPdJN2DAyi12qSvcR nxB5WYXvCzf1xlHoDb4a12YfZRHOluIX2mSzs= Received: by 10.213.3.19 with SMTP id 19mr805929ebl.36.1314049483153; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:44:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.19.132 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:44:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:44:23 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 23:29, Stefan Monnier wr= ote: > severity 9293 wishlist > thanks > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... >> =C2=A0 =C2=A00 .. 9 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 digit-argu= ment =C2=A0(binding currently shadowed) > >> Shadowed by what? > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0e .. f =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 tar-extrac= t =C2=A0(binding currently shadowed) > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0C-d =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= tar-flag-deleted >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0RET =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= tar-extract >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0C-n =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= tar-next-line >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0C-p =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= tar-previous-line >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0SPC =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= tar-next-line >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) > >> Say what mode on each of such lines! > > That would be nice, indeed. I agree. I took a look at this quite some time ago now and wrote the command describe-key-and-map-briefly (which is in ourcomment-utils.el in nXhtml). This uses some adhod guessing to find the keymap that the used key is defined in. Perhaps this can be expanded to take care of the case above too (I am not quite sure at the moment). The command itself is also useful and might replace describe-key-briefly. However when writing this command I noticed that there is not enough information available so some guessing must be done (or the information must be enhanced somehow, of course). From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by In-Reply-To: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.131405273318501 (code B ref 9293); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2011 22:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvd8v-0004oM-6F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:38:53 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145] helo=homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qvd8s-0004oD-PH for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:38:52 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9FD70406F; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=FfAB05io0GykhTsN7jUVqO0VDchCcmlWWPj8NS/ljjzXtcq1t 9cM+qHMunTWbAp24D4jkF13D87XnOCO07qnWOM4MUHCzkhzkmW/y3uk62R/67c74 EODQH8efLpTsvS+s2w3amLrtyr718X4F420+j5pg+dQF8lmxF9MAVtmPkU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=8hXRh5eiuKkTExtWGxM0oYspwf0=; b=oDRwAYAMLaqMA hWqgSYsYnBXjeJQEbxcr9ampkHbVNaQNse80WZfXVOELS3uQaPCjyEB/nBERnQ9Z 4PSAhggsSLCU+pr3z0mSlXhQ+/UXepmBshD8yOe6cqP4mno/Vgyn5q1N+pKlzbKS 0eFqFd2a+f0ibWTQicTX2cdX4w/yZY= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-1-251.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.1.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ECD670406E; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org References: Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:36:22 +0800 Message-ID: <87aab1qdjt.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) >>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: SM> That would be nice, indeed. In this case, I can guess it's the SM> view-mode bindings, probably because you used `v' from dired to visit SM> that file. I guess that is a good guess. But a bad to guess that the users like to guess. From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> In-Reply-To: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: Le Wang Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: lennart.borgman@gmail.com Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.13154959469582 (code B ref 9293); Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2011 15:32:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1gaY-0002UV-IK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:32:26 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1gaW-0002UN-6D for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:32:24 -0400 Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so693680qwa.0 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:28:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TnwNX08V2jKc9nL93Lw2yslMDgPY8BMnhTgp4e0yGTs=; b=raQU1tzlZPZ1gxfu3EVDu9wp4ujA6EOmbnNU0jpg1ltP/lMLBvYCNEWtG/2mZgujLv qrKDKWYs490yrvNYqcKa6X91GWzNEwuSJRTa9hfKZVgsyN6W/Z3sX4WCLDjDRMW5eErb BvzCu3LHSQ/Hde2So8QtMIxQjfLvvHlcbUvAk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.214.5 with SMTP id gy5mr627284qab.127.1315495704597; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.61.1 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:28:24 +0800 Message-ID: From: Le Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) I just wanted to add that I've been bitten by this unhelpful message as well. I just came across an issue where I made a derived mode based on diff-mode, but my key bindings were overwridden no matter what I tried. Finally I found this bug, and used Lennart's `describe-key-and-map-briefly', which gave me the information needed to resolve my issue (I didn't know about `minor-mode-overriding-map-alist', I should've RTFM). If the "C-h m" text included this information directly, I would have avoided a lot of frustration. Best, Le From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: jidanni@jidanni.org Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.159679602512034 (code B ref 9293); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2020 10:27:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zab-000381-3V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:27:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zaZ-00037U-6r for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:27:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aWoVbJYValLPgAfwmo2JH2m9GH5NhFdG79NoVKOTCss=; b=uAzL08kATSPA/ERhLAaILxGSx8 4peyxzLxKXz5h8VU2jF4eAeWtl8M4oSIsvWGihyaWC3N2GSPCvnovtHn+QUNQyhYfM4kbnR1Q6qHC GggpPqaH/WG30B5FEn7zook0UrHKXYcojk7MeLM8HlQBER5Ovw3CUsxH30ViXZpC4Cvw=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zaR-0005vy-1Y; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:26:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:26:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:03:25 +0800") Message-ID: <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) > > Shadowed by what? > > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) > > Shadowed by what? > > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) [...] > Say what mode on each of such lines! This was eight years ago -- has this been fixed in the meantime? If not -- what are the steps to reproduce this bug? I'm not getting any shadowed bindings. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.159680655215589 (code B ref 9293); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2020 13:22:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k42KN-00043N-P5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:22:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com ([209.85.219.177]:39467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k42KK-000438-VJ for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:22:30 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id q16so1000856ybk.6 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:22:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JOsqD+53OUSgrYNBUUuJlhn+vGuCtwbUUHFVEqZiyVM=; b=MTW0yUTG7/J6O7R3t2HhX1zKmEzJcQ1pI0SL2WGmjJF3XXN20YyUruWrs1zm4T+X0/ 5RgFig4DwwIOn9k4gJQjAlZxTanf/+cKk0JdlcXzXCrpxz3BN+dvBYr91VlTNAimb5GL btXu16f2Jbm7tIcOI+u4us0umZ8TQmr/kK/SnXoXbJPjOtA/jlX/s11zVeDgRUVkrhkq 4i8/QyXHXdvi3NqNlzbJxWXZ0hOsgIXasRWLAfsoJ5ET8z1Uu61mJhkecqdzGzec1OcD 7RqT1XsU9hvw6PyJc7Jyd4D/L3T1UfY3xxV/VGsQxOL/nZjkCmWiB4I1OcsNa2gXYqy8 rvWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533h9bs4lEj5qFRhoErwdXiLgmRzbueb/nqDMfwh3WVl46zcnzPb TSjqmE3vj0at2e+vo9vOWaGpm5YVpeKZ+G3KJpR3nQUA4yo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwogUJRzpZLg2i+teC8F6s2m5NH2Ly5s+L4sNundXCudQFluqAOhIIJa6Sq0H2opOdrDhyE+nUZ265GU+L/RpM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4609:: with SMTP id t9mr19573684yba.231.1596806543327; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:22:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> From: Stefan Kangas Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:22:12 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > > > Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... > > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) > > > > Shadowed by what? > > > > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) > > [...] > > > Say what mode on each of such lines! > > This was eight years ago -- has this been fixed in the meantime? Nope. > If not -- what are the steps to reproduce this bug? I'm not getting any > shadowed bindings. I am working on the branch scratch/substitute-command-keys to replace s-c-k with a Lisp version, but I have not had much time lately so there has been no progress in a couple of months. I can't remember the current status, but I think there may be some tests for this there. Or I didn't get to that yet, sorry, I can't remember now. I hope that this would be easier to fix once we have the Lisp version of s-c-k (and I would personally prefer not to see any changes to the C version meanwhile ;-)). Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 09:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.159687780410253 (code B ref 9293); Sat, 08 Aug 2020 09:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2020 09:10:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Krc-0002fJ-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 05:10:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4KrX-0002ef-SI for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 05:10:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gd3GLXTopkS74Z8x0JgFYrBAcAG99Dtunf/lHFztuUo=; b=ejdRHV+LiomGcjZnHtom0Nh8z0 jRYMNpFlJTU8qwNni0itY3Jibs/704EqmfgeHleLYmqgNp/7ermY9kUFU6MvuxG9pnUHy4dwRkVNf NOo1cGWlJRLuHqhFk3mcf37L6cXdxU1ZaWRD/fdrqy3ZeAAboUjQFJywQWSW/W1fxS7s=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k4KrM-0002HL-Rp; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:09:51 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:09:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:22:12 +0200") Message-ID: <871rkh7bc4.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > I am working on the branch scratch/substitute-command-keys to replace > s-c-k with a Lisp version, but I have not had much time lately so > there has been no progress in a couple of months. I can't [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > I am working on the branch scratch/substitute-command-keys to replace > s-c-k with a Lisp version, but I have not had much time lately so > there has been no progress in a couple of months. I can't remember the > current status, but I think there may be some tests for this there. Or > I didn't get to that yet, sorry, I can't remember now. > > I hope that this would be easier to fix once we have the Lisp version > of s-c-k (and I would personally prefer not to see any changes to the > C version meanwhile ;-)). Yeah, that makes sense. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160386085917251 (code B ref 9293); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2020 04:54:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXdTX-0004UB-3z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:54:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com ([209.85.208.52]:35054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXdTV-0004Ty-Jg for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:54:18 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id w25so3778087edx.2 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:54:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QIXQg1nmyjPii26vhMB5yd6cyGelXDkDXwfaEv7ZUks=; b=WplhgKPooE8bHjyDck+vFMsKooAV+Fsqy+r6om0NNtV8wyxBNzMr5BfIXnBI84pEBO 6CJHxqOc1TFiu6E5lq5u1/gPODB7huxnZRK2ueC05XfB3cvTFNq6/cURV+anzPrOs8rF NzsPc6Q5U3QAbWXlLcerCbkerKndeHSeo//eaX05sJuDYJCW+iK1nUDkQTMKyGcTd7q9 vQqlctoYhCjZpOL8waK1LJ7dP5XwDoJu5JorIefQ5YkISWm0NWsR9BMLHS/kDMfde+X4 3piizXfMIAP8xysPOTkKFZfVAS7TqxqBok1//EiB5NF8VfJdWqF9FLK4GTjOnKR8pTrY aFAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jnz6r1HrGqlPk4R1N7VNHw3fe/eB1KwtBcBYqWYE7cvp2Jx8l dNvkQFkwCj4CHG9RYLXUnaZBMG8zAzdq1PeA/dL1bz2+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGe9oDJDl+zLSVGhJbcYD5mWKJHolf1s52xbEijkJpTRJEKM6QjWJuScHFFkhcEju435sRBAnrGn9KloQxQ+w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3133:: with SMTP id dd19mr6010438edb.100.1603860839224; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:53:52 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:22:12 +0200") References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:53:52 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Stefan Kangas writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> jidanni@jidanni.org writes: >> >> > Tar mode defined in `tar-mode.el':... >> > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) >> > >> > Shadowed by what? >> > >> > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) >> >> [...] Note that the text here is changed to "(this binding is currently shadowed)", see Bug#14086. >> >> > Say what mode on each of such lines! >> >> This was eight years ago -- has this been fixed in the meantime? > > Nope. > >> If not -- what are the steps to reproduce this bug? I'm not getting any >> shadowed bindings. > > I am working on the branch scratch/substitute-command-keys to replace > s-c-k with a Lisp version, but I have not had much time lately so > there has been no progress in a couple of months. I can't remember the > current status, but I think there may be some tests for this there. Or > I didn't get to that yet, sorry, I can't remember now. > > I hope that this would be easier to fix once we have the Lisp version > of s-c-k Contrary to my hopes this part was in fact _not_ converted to Lisp with the merge of scratch/substitute-command-keys. This was due to poor performance of my Lisp version of that code. So this should be as easy or hard as it was before to fix. The text comes from describe_map in keymap.c (at the very end of the function) if someone wants to take a stab at improving this. From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: (no subject) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160388369031816 (code B ref 9293); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2020 11:14:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXjPl-0008H6-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:14:49 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXjPk-0008Gq-5c for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:14:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3hJqkFspzVNxBS5iLi9ySNgdRU1cW1YLHDiEwaocK5s=; b=a4fzSdjM1SPbfzGEJV87bm7IVh +fooFJ+jsMuKVQfHTe0m31hsCG4oJqny7pwlXg3nmnWUAwY5XkBVnLfk8wN1Zz9gq7mOel04eHjXS 2+6nw2QAseFylzpfQYM8tFulvDm9moLEc1EZjoIY8SbjfRywZZPNHM09iTZukKw1uOaE=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXjPa-0001Lf-MB; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:14:41 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: New Fads's _Love It All_: "PSV" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:14:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:53:52 -0700") Message-ID: <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Contrary to my hopes this part was in fact _not_ converted to Lisp with > the merge of scratch/substitute-command-keys. This was due to poor > performance of my Lisp version of that code. So this sh [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Contrary to my hopes this part was in fact _not_ converted to Lisp with > the merge of scratch/substitute-command-keys. This was due to poor > performance of my Lisp version of that code. So this sh [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [95.216.78.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Stefan Kangas writes: > Contrary to my hopes this part was in fact _not_ converted to Lisp with > the merge of scratch/substitute-command-keys. This was due to poor > performance of my Lisp version of that code. So this should be as easy > or hard as it was before to fix. Right. So, here's the test case (since one wasn't given in the original bug report): C-x C-f file.tgz RET M-x view-mode RET C-h m Notice key binding --- ------- 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) This is both confusing and... wrong? `C-h c e' does say "e runs the command View-exit", but `C-h c f' says "f runs the command tar-extract". And all of keys `0' through `9' really do call `digit-argument', so that one is just totally wrong. So there's a bug here, and an improvement request in addition. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160522730617421 (code B ref 9293); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2020 00:28:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46108 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdMwz-0004Wv-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:28:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com ([209.85.208.49]:40661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdMwx-0004Wh-3G for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:28:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id p93so8612329edd.7 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:28:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iXoVtDfZqrhByR3K2TBtSn5Ci/CRBpziOb17OlF1MMQ=; b=KK/GXHvYF7Lx/RCOMcYE4YlX9uEn7n6U/FwT/it4o2GpLbttR3jcFIt6y3yXvYH85E KmioStvD6mB/D2WCELBTpTnodkS2g33nWcnDk/PKWpS9+ALkKpccA8vX3uTJpK0pDWq4 DzeLved8SRRAd7B+GsdMF4p4yHGf/9xWVDU5elHC/DyPdPd7hYw9t56FSBIgJLw4SUsD y71yTZtdBrhE3jQvSX+cyZ8XGwqAgCjHRrkSyW9F6ZR3OZn54rfHMiqzPrmHRMcTjlsm WxRhlBYidBRzo71HjUNOHay7YwZSj68QhaBDe7wumCF0rCSpZtYS3RQiMjrufR/S6Id/ 8adA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MxHaHbgruxNYuL0qyNswRmW+xKTmsSToRhLSwDDmM0hSJQEOZ LXIU8ZNSJNXRivIiVcMUQO6PRWvyaqU2vHTplws= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwckeuzvWklnZs/PPz0GC6ZuQhrgS0wVD0mi2OxmScqiRyyFe6QeJIxn4D4gS9vgM4GGLZIATUMPGNIMs7NLYI= X-Received: by 2002:a50:bb25:: with SMTP id y34mr2596020ede.249.1605227297282; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:28:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:28:16 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:28:16 -0500 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So, here's the test case (since one wasn't given in the original bug > report): > > C-x C-f file.tgz RET > M-x view-mode RET > C-h m > > Notice > > key binding > --- ------- > > 0 .. 9 digit-argumen [...] Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So, here's the test case (since one wasn't given in the original bug > report): > > C-x C-f file.tgz RET > M-x view-mode RET > C-h m > > Notice > > key binding > --- ------- > > 0 .. 9 digit-argumen [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So, here's the test case (since one wasn't given in the original bug > report): > > C-x C-f file.tgz RET > M-x view-mode RET > C-h m > > Notice > > key binding > --- ------- > > 0 .. 9 digit-argument (binding currently shadowed) > e .. f tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) > > This is both confusing and... wrong? > > `C-h c e' does say "e runs the command View-exit", but > `C-h c f' says "f runs the command tar-extract". I think there are two issues: 1. If you don't enable `view-mode', you will see that in `tar-mode-map' both `e' and `f' are bound to `tar-extract'. However, when you enable `view-mode', only `e' is shadowed. > And all of keys `0' through `9' really do call `digit-argument', so that > one is just totally wrong. 2. `0 .. 9' are technically shadowed, in the sense that there is a binding for them in an overriding keymap. Only that in this case the binding in the other keymap is the exact same command. So in conclusion the output here should probably be: 0 .. 9 digit-argument e tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) f tar-extract From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160529628115370 (code B ref 9293); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2020 19:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdetV-0003zk-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:38:01 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:39481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdetQ-0003zH-WE for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:38:00 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s25so15243277ejy.6 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:37:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yDKM/qrSIsgE7QLZjGpUEwqRjzTPHbno9TE7HfEoIbc=; b=N9JQFnxeI/HT6Dz2br9XRuUXF5mBJkhnORbR6qQaQamL5c11jGQ3bYf8H4MaBcyyuX wyhNJo5SU/EKcpeOsjNgeOFeCw+27c5qywUEK0HkdNlm1+tcbmmVJjkXbypR2UKUrW2X 7suFhbqkEzsX4+UK7Qij2lpbpbL2TWr2CKQhfeWFgmod5l5Utg82yB/C0M97vqQnsUe/ U/S2USJrV3ojpx3TMYcMz3UMYvtr97n1NjjhrjIR3mfWKVhzUCraaoi+78fArpwVn3q3 t7LpK520WeIwi5M2R6R9jc4hdN+XdnVW4/VofLlNpjDvp73gFa+7VkvR2KG2donMYFDn dcQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DzgL9+jTF3DrViXIryxQBVnLJdMpsM/qzxMZDtAqfyGG5D7ih Q15qg8rH9KpQjvSzkJGFFqBFRsn0J4n+MopDtZ4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwHayOVDiWe63Yhp4KSwyD00/7LZH/hJw0HFR3rlG463VyuLtHP9qZ4+BMqtZ8zKdAExmArQNYoXXY7353WII= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce24:: with SMTP id sd4mr3467072ejb.432.1605296271070; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:37:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:37:49 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:37:49 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000ff4b2705b402290b" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --000000000000ff4b2705b402290b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tags 9293 + patch thanks Stefan Kangas writes: > So in conclusion the output here should probably be: > > 0 .. 9 digit-argument > e tar-extract (binding currently shadowed) > f tar-extract I've attached three patches. The first fixes the bug with broken ranges, the second one fixes the incorrect shadowing by the same command, and the third one takes care of the feature request. Using the original recipe, I now get: 0 .. 9 digit-argument e tar-extract (currently shadowed by =E2=80=98View-exit=E2=80=99) f tar-extract Comments? --000000000000ff4b2705b402290b Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0001-Don-t-show-key-ranges-if-shadowed-by-different-comma.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Don-t-show-key-ranges-if-shadowed-by-different-comma.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: fa9dd69ad0d0576e_0.1 RnJvbSBlY2M5MTNmZTU5OTQ4OGMxODc4MTE4ZGU0MjgzZmQ2MTM0ZmY1MGNmIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5AbWFyeGlzdC5zZT4KRGF0 ZTogRnJpLCAxMyBOb3YgMjAyMCAxNToyODoyOSArMDEwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0ggMS8zXSBE b24ndCBzaG93IGtleSByYW5nZXMgaWYgc2hhZG93ZWQgYnkgZGlmZmVyZW50IGNvbW1hbmRzCgoq IHNyYy9rZXltYXAuYyAoZGVzY3JpYmVfdmVjdG9yKTogTWFrZSBzdXJlIGZvdW5kIGNvbnNlY3V0 aXZlIGtleXMKYXJlIGVpdGhlciBub3Qgc2hhZG93ZWQgb3IsIGlmIHRoZXkgYXJlLCB0aGF0IHRo ZXkgYXJlIHNoYWRvd2VkIGJ5CnRoZSBzYW1lIGNvbW1hbmQuICAoQnVnIzkyOTMpCiogdGVzdC9z cmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3RzLmVsCihoZWxwLS1kZXNjcmliZS12ZWN0b3IvYnVnLTkyOTMtb25lLXNo YWRvd2VkLWluLXJhbmdlKTogTmV3IHRlc3QuCi0tLQogc3JjL2tleW1hcC5jICAgICAgICAgICAg IHwgMjIgKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrLS0tLQogdGVzdC9zcmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3RzLmVsIHwg MjcgKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrCiAyIGZpbGVzIGNoYW5nZWQsIDQ1IGluc2Vy dGlvbnMoKyksIDQgZGVsZXRpb25zKC0pCgpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvc3JjL2tleW1hcC5jIGIvc3Jj L2tleW1hcC5jCmluZGV4IDE4MWRjZGFkM2EuLjQ2MTZmMjdjMjUgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBhL3NyYy9r ZXltYXAuYworKysgYi9zcmMva2V5bWFwLmMKQEAgLTMwODUsNiArMzA4NSw3IEBAIGRlc2NyaWJl X3ZlY3RvciAoTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgdmVjdG9yLCBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBwcmVmaXgsIExpc3BfT2Jq ZWN0IGFyZ3MsCiAgIGZvciAoaSA9IGZyb207IDsgaSsrKQogICAgIHsKICAgICAgIGJvb2wgdGhp c19zaGFkb3dlZCA9IDA7CisgICAgICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBzaGFkb3dlZF9ieSA9IE5VTEw7CiAg ICAgICBpbnQgcmFuZ2VfYmVnLCByYW5nZV9lbmQ7CiAgICAgICBMaXNwX09iamVjdCB2YWw7CiAK QEAgLTMxMjcsMTEgKzMxMjgsOSBAQCBkZXNjcmliZV92ZWN0b3IgKExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IHZlY3Rv ciwgTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgcHJlZml4LCBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBhcmdzLAogICAgICAgLyogSWYgdGhp cyBiaW5kaW5nIGlzIHNoYWRvd2VkIGJ5IHNvbWUgb3RoZXIgbWFwLCBpZ25vcmUgaXQuICAqLwog ICAgICAgaWYgKCFOSUxQIChzaGFkb3cpKQogCXsKLQkgIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IHRlbTsKLQotCSAg dGVtID0gc2hhZG93X2xvb2t1cCAoc2hhZG93LCBrbHVkZ2UsIFF0LCAwKTsKKwkgIHNoYWRvd2Vk X2J5ID0gc2hhZG93X2xvb2t1cCAoc2hhZG93LCBrbHVkZ2UsIFF0LCAwKTsKIAotCSAgaWYgKCFO SUxQICh0ZW0pKQorCSAgaWYgKCFOSUxQIChzaGFkb3dlZF9ieSkpCiAJICAgIHsKIAkgICAgICBp ZiAobWVudGlvbl9zaGFkb3cpCiAJCXRoaXNfc2hhZG93ZWQgPSAxOwpAQCAtMzE4Niw2ICszMTg1 LDIxIEBAIGRlc2NyaWJlX3ZlY3RvciAoTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgdmVjdG9yLCBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBw cmVmaXgsIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IGFyZ3MsCiAJICAgICAgICYmICFOSUxQIChGZXF1YWwgKHRlbTIs IGRlZmluaXRpb24pKSkKIAkgIGkrKzsKIAorICAgICAgLyogTWFrZSBzdXJlIGZvdW5kIGNvbnNl Y3V0aXZlIGtleXMgYXJlIGVpdGhlciBub3Qgc2hhZG93ZWQgb3IsCisJIGlmIHRoZXkgYXJlLCB0 aGF0IHRoZXkgYXJlIHNoYWRvd2VkIGJ5IHRoZSBzYW1lIGNvbW1hbmQuICAqLworICAgICAgaWYg KENIQVJfVEFCTEVfUCAodmVjdG9yKSAmJiBpICE9IHN0YXJ0aW5nX2kpCisJeworCSAgTGlzcF9P YmplY3QgdGVtOworCSAgTGlzcF9PYmplY3Qga2V5ID0gbWFrZV9uaWxfdmVjdG9yICgxKTsKKwkg IGZvciAoaW50IGogPSBzdGFydGluZ19pICsgMTsgaiA8PSBpOyBqKyspCisJICAgIHsKKwkgICAg ICBBU0VUIChrZXksIDAsIG1ha2VfZml4bnVtIChqKSk7CisJICAgICAgdGVtID0gc2hhZG93X2xv b2t1cCAoc2hhZG93LCBrZXksIFF0LCAwKTsKKwkgICAgICBpZiAoTklMUCAoRmVxdWFsICh0ZW0s IHNoYWRvd2VkX2J5KSkpCisJCWkgPSBqIC0gMTsKKwkgICAgfQorCX0KKwogICAgICAgLyogSWYg d2UgaGF2ZSBhIHJhbmdlIG9mIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUgY2hhcmFjdGVyLAogCSBwcmludCB3aGVy ZSB0aGUgcmFuZ2UgcmVhY2hlcyB0by4gICovCiAKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Rlc3Qvc3JjL2tleW1h cC10ZXN0cy5lbCBiL3Rlc3Qvc3JjL2tleW1hcC10ZXN0cy5lbAppbmRleCBlM2RkODQyMGQ3Li5i MjMwOTU4YjM2IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS90ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwKKysrIGIvdGVz dC9zcmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3RzLmVsCkBAIC0xNzAsNiArMTcwLDMzIEBAIGtleW1hcC13aGVyZS1p cy1pbnRlcm5hbC9wcmVmZXJyZWQtbW9kaWZpZXItaXMtYS1zdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgICh3 aGVyZS1pcy1pbnRlcm5hbCAnZXhlY3V0ZS1leHRlbmRlZC1jb21tYW5kIGdsb2JhbC1tYXAgdCkp CiAgICAgICAgICAgWyN4ODAwMDA3OF0pKSkKIAorDAorOzs7OyBkZXNjcmliZV92ZWN0b3IKKwor KGVydC1kZWZ0ZXN0IGhlbHAtLWRlc2NyaWJlLXZlY3Rvci9idWctOTI5My1vbmUtc2hhZG93ZWQt aW4tcmFuZ2UgKCkKKyAgIkNoZWNrIHRoYXQgd2Ugb25seSBzaG93IGEgcmFuZ2UgaWYgc2hhZG93 ZWQgYnkgdGhlIHNhbWUgY29tbWFuZC4iCisgIChsZXQgKChvcmlnLW1hcCAobGV0ICgobWFwICht YWtlLWtleW1hcCkpKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoZGVmaW5lLWtleSBtYXAgImUiICdm b28pCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiZiIgJ2ZvbykKKyAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgbWFwICJnIiAnZm9vKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAoZGVmaW5lLWtleSBtYXAgImgiICdmb28pCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1hcCkp CisgICAgICAgIChzaGFkb3ctbWFwIChsZXQgKChtYXAgKG1ha2Uta2V5bWFwKSkpCisgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgbWFwICJmIiAnYmFyKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIG1hcCkpKQorICAgICh3aXRoLXRlbXAtYnVmZmVyCisgICAgICAoaGVscC0tZGVzY3Jp YmUtdmVjdG9yIChjYWRyIG9yaWctbWFwKSBuaWwgIydoZWxwLS1kZXNjcmliZS1jb21tYW5kCisg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHQgc2hhZG93LW1hcCBvcmlnLW1hcCB0KQorICAg ICAgKHNob3VsZCAoZXF1YWwgKGJ1ZmZlci1zdHJpbmcpCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAi CitlCQlmb28KK2YJCWZvbyAgKGJpbmRpbmcgY3VycmVudGx5IHNoYWRvd2VkKQorZyAuLiBoCQlm b28KKyIpKSkpKQorCisMCis7Ozs7IGFwcm9wb3MtaW50ZXJuYWwKKwogKGVydC1kZWZ0ZXN0IGtl eW1hcC1hcHJvcG9zLWludGVybmFsICgpCiAgIChzaG91bGQgKGVxdWFsIChhcHJvcG9zLWludGVy bmFsICJebmV4dC1saW5lJCIpICcobmV4dC1saW5lKSkpCiAgIChzaG91bGQgKD49IChsZW5ndGgg KGFwcm9wb3MtaW50ZXJuYWwgIl5oZWxwIikpIDEwMCkpCi0tIAoyLjI5LjIKCg== --000000000000ff4b2705b402290b Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0002-Don-t-shadow-bindings-by-the-same-command.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0002-Don-t-shadow-bindings-by-the-same-command.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: fa9dd69ad0d0576e_0.2 RnJvbSA0ZWYxNzdkMDEzM2QxZTk3YjEzYjhkY2ZlOThjMzA5M2FjMDJkODk3IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5AbWFyeGlzdC5zZT4KRGF0 ZTogRnJpLCAxMyBOb3YgMjAyMCAxNToyODozNCArMDEwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0ggMi8zXSBE b24ndCBzaGFkb3cgYmluZGluZ3MgYnkgdGhlIHNhbWUgY29tbWFuZAoKKiBzcmMva2V5bWFwLmMg KGRlc2NyaWJlX3ZlY3Rvcik6IERvIG5vdCBzYXkgYmluZGluZyBpcyBzaGFkb3dlZCBpZgp0aGUg b3RoZXIga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcgcG9pbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBzYW1lIGNvbW1hbmQuICAoQnVnIzkyOTMp CiogdGVzdC9zcmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3RzLmVsCihoZWxwLS1kZXNjcmliZS12ZWN0b3IvYnVnLTky OTMtc2FtZS1jb21tYW5kLWRvZXMtbm90LXNoYWRvdyk6IE5ldwp0ZXN0LgotLS0KIHNyYy9rZXlt YXAuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAyICstCiB0ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwgfCAyNCAr KysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysKIDIgZmlsZXMgY2hhbmdlZCwgMjUgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygr KSwgMSBkZWxldGlvbigtKQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3NyYy9rZXltYXAuYyBiL3NyYy9rZXltYXAu YwppbmRleCA0NjE2ZjI3YzI1Li4xNzRlZTRmZDUwIDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9zcmMva2V5bWFwLmMK KysrIGIvc3JjL2tleW1hcC5jCkBAIC0zMTMwLDcgKzMxMzAsNyBAQCBkZXNjcmliZV92ZWN0b3Ig KExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IHZlY3RvciwgTGlzcF9PYmplY3QgcHJlZml4LCBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBhcmdz LAogCXsKIAkgIHNoYWRvd2VkX2J5ID0gc2hhZG93X2xvb2t1cCAoc2hhZG93LCBrbHVkZ2UsIFF0 LCAwKTsKIAotCSAgaWYgKCFOSUxQIChzaGFkb3dlZF9ieSkpCisJICBpZiAoIU5JTFAgKHNoYWRv d2VkX2J5KSAmJiAhRVEgKHNoYWRvd2VkX2J5LCBkZWZpbml0aW9uKSkKIAkgICAgewogCSAgICAg IGlmIChtZW50aW9uX3NoYWRvdykKIAkJdGhpc19zaGFkb3dlZCA9IDE7CmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS90 ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwgYi90ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwKaW5kZXgg YjIzMDk1OGIzNi4uMzQwMjI3MzExYyAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvdGVzdC9zcmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3Rz LmVsCisrKyBiL3Rlc3Qvc3JjL2tleW1hcC10ZXN0cy5lbApAQCAtMTk0LDYgKzE5NCwzMCBAQCBo ZWxwLS1kZXNjcmliZS12ZWN0b3IvYnVnLTkyOTMtb25lLXNoYWRvd2VkLWluLXJhbmdlCiBnIC4u IGgJCWZvbwogIikpKSkpCiAKKyhlcnQtZGVmdGVzdCBoZWxwLS1kZXNjcmliZS12ZWN0b3IvYnVn LTkyOTMtc2FtZS1jb21tYW5kLWRvZXMtbm90LXNoYWRvdyAoKQorICAiQ2hlY2sgdGhhdCBhIGNv bW1hbmQgY2FuJ3QgYmUgc2hhZG93ZWQgYnkgdGhlIHNhbWUgY29tbWFuZC4iCisgIChsZXQgKChy YW5nZS1tYXAKKyAgICAgICAgIChsZXQgKChtYXAgKG1ha2Uta2V5bWFwKSkpCisgICAgICAgICAg IChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiMCIgJ2ZvbykKKyAgICAgICAgICAgKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgbWFwICIx IiAnZm9vKQorICAgICAgICAgICAoZGVmaW5lLWtleSBtYXAgIjIiICdmb28pCisgICAgICAgICAg IChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiMyIgJ2ZvbykKKyAgICAgICAgICAgbWFwKSkKKyAgICAgICAgKHNo YWRvdy1tYXAKKyAgICAgICAgIChsZXQgKChtYXAgKG1ha2Uta2V5bWFwKSkpCisgICAgICAgICAg IChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiMCIgJ2ZvbykKKyAgICAgICAgICAgKGRlZmluZS1rZXkgbWFwICIx IiAnZm9vKQorICAgICAgICAgICAoZGVmaW5lLWtleSBtYXAgIjIiICdmb28pCisgICAgICAgICAg IChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiMyIgJ2ZvbykKKyAgICAgICAgICAgbWFwKSkpCisgICAod2l0aC10 ZW1wLWJ1ZmZlcgorICAgICAoaGVscC0tZGVzY3JpYmUtdmVjdG9yIChjYWRyIHJhbmdlLW1hcCkg bmlsICMnaGVscC0tZGVzY3JpYmUtY29tbWFuZAorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IHQgc2hhZG93LW1hcCByYW5nZS1tYXAgdCkKKyAgICAgKHNob3VsZCAoZXF1YWwgKGJ1ZmZlci1z dHJpbmcpCisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICIKKzAgLi4gMwkJZm9vCisiKSkpKSkKKwogDAog Ozs7OyBhcHJvcG9zLWludGVybmFsCiAKLS0gCjIuMjkuMgoK --000000000000ff4b2705b402290b Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="US-ASCII"; name="0003-Say-which-command-shadows-a-key-binding.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0003-Say-which-command-shadows-a-key-binding.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: fa9dd69ad0d0576e_0.3 RnJvbSA4NzYxYTU1Yjc1MWNmMmEyMDg0OTZkMzQ0MWUzNWM5Njk5MTI3NzMyIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBTdGVmYW4gS2FuZ2FzIDxzdGVmYW5AbWFyeGlzdC5zZT4KRGF0 ZTogRnJpLCAxMyBOb3YgMjAyMCAxOToxNToyMSArMDEwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0ggMy8zXSBT YXkgd2hpY2ggY29tbWFuZCBzaGFkb3dzIGEga2V5IGJpbmRpbmcKCiogc3JjL2tleW1hcC5jIChk ZXNjcmliZV92ZWN0b3IpOiBTYXkgd2hpY2ggY29tbWFuZCBzaGFkb3dzIHRoaXMKYmluZGluZy4g IChCdWcjOTI5MykKKiB0ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwKKGhlbHAtLWRlc2NyaWJlLXZl Y3Rvci9idWctOTI5My1vbmUtc2hhZG93ZWQtaW4tcmFuZ2UpOiBBZGFwdAp0ZXN0LgotLS0KIHNy Yy9rZXltYXAuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICB8IDggKysrKysrKy0KIHRlc3Qvc3JjL2tleW1hcC10ZXN0 cy5lbCB8IDUgKysrLS0KIDIgZmlsZXMgY2hhbmdlZCwgMTAgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygrKSwgMyBkZWxl dGlvbnMoLSkKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9zcmMva2V5bWFwLmMgYi9zcmMva2V5bWFwLmMKaW5kZXgg MTc0ZWU0ZmQ1MC4uNzIxNDFiZGQ1YSAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvc3JjL2tleW1hcC5jCisrKyBiL3Ny Yy9rZXltYXAuYwpAQCAtMzIyMyw3ICszMjIzLDEzIEBAIGRlc2NyaWJlX3ZlY3RvciAoTGlzcF9P YmplY3QgdmVjdG9yLCBMaXNwX09iamVjdCBwcmVmaXgsIExpc3BfT2JqZWN0IGFyZ3MsCiAgICAg ICBpZiAodGhpc19zaGFkb3dlZCkKIAl7CiAJICBTRVRfUFQgKFBUIC0gMSk7Ci0JICBpbnNlcnRf c3RyaW5nICgiICAoYmluZGluZyBjdXJyZW50bHkgc2hhZG93ZWQpIik7CisJICBzdGF0aWMgY2hh ciBjb25zdCBmbXRbXSA9ICIgIChjdXJyZW50bHkgc2hhZG93ZWQgYnkgYCVzJykiOworCSAgVVNF X1NBRkVfQUxMT0NBOworCSAgY2hhciAqYnVmZmVyID0gU0FGRV9BTExPQ0EgKHNpemVvZiBmbXQg KworCQkJCSAgICAgIFNCWVRFUyAoU1lNQk9MX05BTUUgKHNoYWRvd2VkX2J5KSkpOworCSAgZXNw cmludGYgKGJ1ZmZlciwgZm10LCBTREFUQSAoU1lNQk9MX05BTUUgKHNoYWRvd2VkX2J5KSkpOwor CSAgaW5zZXJ0X3N0cmluZyAoYnVmZmVyKTsKKwkgIFNBRkVfRlJFRSgpOwogCSAgU0VUX1BUIChQ VCArIDEpOwogCX0KICAgICB9CmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS90ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwg Yi90ZXN0L3NyYy9rZXltYXAtdGVzdHMuZWwKaW5kZXggMzQwMjI3MzExYy4uZjYyNTg5Zjc0YiAx MDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvdGVzdC9zcmMva2V5bWFwLXRlc3RzLmVsCisrKyBiL3Rlc3Qvc3JjL2tleW1h cC10ZXN0cy5lbApAQCAtMTgzLDE0ICsxODMsMTUgQEAgaGVscC0tZGVzY3JpYmUtdmVjdG9yL2J1 Zy05MjkzLW9uZS1zaGFkb3dlZC1pbi1yYW5nZQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBtYXApKQog ICAgICAgICAoc2hhZG93LW1hcCAobGV0ICgobWFwIChtYWtlLWtleW1hcCkpKQogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIChkZWZpbmUta2V5IG1hcCAiZiIgJ2JhcikKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBtYXApKSkKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBtYXApKQorICAgICAgICAodGV4dC1x dW90aW5nLXN0eWxlICdncmF2ZSkpCiAgICAgKHdpdGgtdGVtcC1idWZmZXIKICAgICAgIChoZWxw LS1kZXNjcmliZS12ZWN0b3IgKGNhZHIgb3JpZy1tYXApIG5pbCAjJ2hlbHAtLWRlc2NyaWJlLWNv bW1hbmQKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdCBzaGFkb3ctbWFwIG9yaWctbWFw IHQpCiAgICAgICAoc2hvdWxkIChlcXVhbCAoYnVmZmVyLXN0cmluZykKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICIKIGUJCWZvbwotZgkJZm9vICAoYmluZGluZyBjdXJyZW50bHkgc2hhZG93ZWQpCitm CQlmb28gIChjdXJyZW50bHkgc2hhZG93ZWQgYnkgYGJhcicpCiBnIC4uIGgJCWZvbwogIikpKSkp CiAKLS0gCjIuMjkuMgoK --000000000000ff4b2705b402290b-- From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160536918016698 (code B ref 9293); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2020 15:53:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdxrI-0004LG-L4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:53:00 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdxrG-0004Kw-4Y for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:52:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rmB5LJOQ41ktK8uap+k7ZDjfJcRb4iT3BjCqgkc7BeA=; b=iR0V/33o5vteMen67gbFK0slwm WRNckbNZ+c/D+/UxSk4ruv14TxdUYby1uPBpAZIdw+zH4ChOtwA8IKtV/XEQRs8gX5kAcHeuLwilD gVLfN6ut9dMBVhrY6TssIuX5nVqXquab48cfeIPEFDXIbR9tQD2XnJG/Mapco/YISiCU=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdxqy-0000LM-F5; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:52:50 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEXh39ixp6Xk4tyC paqLtdhwmln///9J99hjAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAlwSFlzAAAuIwAALiMBeKU/dgAAAAd0SU1F B+QLDg8zIWVQh0UAAAFwSURBVDjLfZTLbgIxDEUdq907PPZOKj4Addi3mmFf2ub/fwXbeUwyAowE wSf32glmAB6HW5cEjggAowZbyt6ZvAAGZFamKduATKqKliuSuAmUlwJs32t42SweuFUEvxNnFYRd n2cvINd21AMnwJpCWeIgEJCbcufmxfBtIFpTsrT+3xaJDcjJDmhX6lqyn8syVyAte78vwHcKiB2Y nymWBqAD85Tt2jlCVRwqIANYweVvBDHsDVxSmgarorimlP4bgAImEyTzOouVTQE6A0mjgjJCL8Es 6UsarazG1RRTD/SuHgF8CQ4FfOWSGeglApwM2O8OHvLJWe4mBs3f8kQA5QllnR5W8FNGBYtCp4qP An7X6VpnWsE6qrCC92fglI4r4I58CMCuhJwjQ74BxQFYf/IJsdkONZiHfw90u/LWDRAfbUU8eQBM rDdKAcl1TwaMQVDwDXB7jgTnKByBkITVpFZgzz448Lwjj52gPWm6uAPVZ4pWjBaclQAAAA5lWElm SUkqAAgAAAAAAAAAAABvylxHAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIwLTExLTE0VDE1OjUxOjMz KzAwOjAwTFzSTwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMC0xMS0xNFQxNTo1MTozMyswMDowMD0B avMAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _Duke_: "Duchess" Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:52:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:37:49 -0800") Message-ID: <87o8k0ylyw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > I've attached three patches. The first fixes the bug with broken > ranges, the second one fixes the incorrect shadowing by the same > command, and the third one takes care of the feature request. > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > I've attached three patches. The first fixes the bug with broken > ranges, the second one fixes the incorrect shadowing by the same > command, and the third one takes care of the feature request. > > Using the original recipe, I now get: > > 0 .. 9 digit-argument > e tar-extract (currently shadowed by =E2=80=98View-exit=E2=80=99) > f tar-extract > > Comments? Looks perfect; go ahead and push. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Aug 15 15:55:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#9293: say what they are shadowed by Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 9293@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Received: via spool by 9293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9293.160601205410840 (code B ref 9293); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 9293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2020 02:27:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgf6D-0002ol-MX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:27:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com ([209.85.208.52]:35683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgf6B-0002oS-UO for 9293@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:27:32 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id cf17so9981841edb.2 for <9293@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:27:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IQqItmQM5whfYv7xvK51NcxKNpKvFLs1mu+XAHajUVg=; b=rop9L3vRNjHJZzSMOvuy3/xVQBneObJPXbisziRLZijyT3swC7O6OXMtThV5yfDF/A aCW9GfLMMGqzxT8/q/amIR1/v6ykFmynIi6uNHUWOS2Lf68gBypvEV2mpkmcTyNRLV1R WEHqunEJnIr3J4GFRedF28yMvoDaEiNnA08qzuM/I2uM1RgRizD7iYrU+zIo8QHulGCE AtYhIbHmtn4ANveaKeuBv1p6vLhKWMqmMFbsG+VnqxXtxlVli/i0w6Hyf4zgQLuiOqQ/ b+t5DnF7ldrmyVjz0nLGm86u2j5n3f2HDcKhLEsb15YK2XZjtu6yhfXJWenPn44RevWP xlxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303EuBVuVnraY8CGmXXb1jtrBrR8hRUeNyaBo1Ecc2XOGKi0Jby WV/bW/Jyv/GADWG/2wvFxMZRJvwQDXZE+w/V+NtTjw2o X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAHvIY0VwTrj+LFGd7jYjg28l3m0GH0P9Z90/0mVdGVgCvDBBXxx41MMw20mbH0Ybb5loiHjElcYd3QVD+a0A= X-Received: by 2002:a50:9f61:: with SMTP id b88mr43508325edf.282.1606012045946; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:27:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:27:25 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87o8k0ylyw.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:52:39 +0100") References: <87aabd1n1e.fsf@jidanni.org> <87lfiq4uqa.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2jqtxeq.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8k0ylyw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:27:25 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 9293 fixed close 9293 28.1 thanks Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> I've attached three patches. The first fixes the bug with broken >> ranges, the second one fixes the incorrect shadowing by the same >> command, and the third one takes care of the feature request. >> >> Using the original recipe, I now get: >> >> 0 .. 9 digit-argument >> e tar-extract (currently shadowed by =E2=80=98View-exit=E2=80=99) >> f tar-extract >> >> Comments? > > Looks perfect; go ahead and push. Thanks. No further comments within a week; pushed to master and closing.