From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:17:02 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#922: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com Reply-To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry), 922@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 922 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12208208516218 (code B ref -1); Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:00:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 20:54:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87Ks6Ts006212 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:54:07 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGn-0007Ra-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGl-0007RK-Ou for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55069 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGl-0007RH-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGl-0005Ku-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:35834 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRF5-0001qf-2g for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:52:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGg-0005Js-Ec for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:02 -0400 Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74]:41125 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGf-0005JW-UC for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:53:58 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl X-Envelope-To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id m87Krv110947; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:53:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:53:57 -0500 Message-Id: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) To: bug-emacs@gnu.org X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) I did not submit my suggestion through "donarmstrong.com". (Although as one of the mailing list maintainers, I am well aware that all bug-emacs mail is going through there now.) I am surprised to be getting a reply from it. It is redundant and (for me) unwanted. Can it be configured to not do this except when people actually initiate the request through the system, or something? karl Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:40:05 -0700 From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Subject: bug#919 closed by Chong Yidong (distributions in lzma or bz2?) This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report which was filed against the emacs package: #919: distributions in lzma or bz2? It has been closed by Chong Yidong . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Chong Yidong by replying to this email. --=20 919: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D919 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 919-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 20:34:36 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87KYXvj031869 for <919-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:34:34 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 705A957E355; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Cc: 919-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. > Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. > (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) > > That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it > available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils > from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the > automake OK, I've made a not to do that. ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 18:48:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87Imdjx026895 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:48:41 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJP-00054m-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052K-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052F-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39106) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJN-00065N-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40385) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPHh-0008R1-UG for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:46:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-000653-Sh for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74]:51162 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-00064t-Hv for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:34 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id m87ImXL08116; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Message-Id: <200809071848.m87ImXL08116@f7.net> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) MIME-Version: 1.0 emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the automake options.) Best, karl ------------=_1220820005-1204-1-- From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:17:02 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#922: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 922@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 922 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 922-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B922.122084072725969 (code B ref 922); Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:35:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 922) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2008 02:25:27 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m882PIiY025692; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:25:19 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcWPd-0002Un-KY; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:23:33 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Karl Berry Cc: 922@debbugs.gnu.org References: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> X-Spook: Waco, Texas analyzer fraud anthrax BCCI advisors afsatcom X-Ran: :|n@-)bUg_worKPoR(@8:`fY%Qvq'.IBj=pXt)P+{Q|]aZi'G`xDSJ0X1~N3J;jheJcM;: X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:23:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> (Karl Berry's message of "Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:53:57 -0500") Message-ID: <06wshnpe8q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii reassign 922 emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com stop Karl Berry wrote: > I did not submit my suggestion through "donarmstrong.com". > (Although as one of the mailing list maintainers, I am well aware that > all bug-emacs mail is going through there now.) > > I am surprised to be getting a reply from it. X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes can help in shutting it up a bit, but I'm not aware of any way to not get mail when a bug one opened is closed. (That doesn't seem too unreasonable.) > It is redundant and (for me) unwanted. > Can it be configured to not do this except when people actually initiate > the request through the system, or something? Good luck effecting any changes. :( See: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:17:02 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#922: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 922@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Don Armstrong Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 922 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 922-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B922.122084108527809 (code B ref 922); Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:40:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 922) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 8 Sep 2008 02:31:25 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m882VMVo027803 for <922@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:31:23 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcWVW-0002jB-6L; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:29:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18628.36370.124362.821020@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:29:38 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Karl Berry , <922@debbugs.gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <06wshnpe8q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> <06wshnpe8q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: yellow X-Ran: =rk.K4#V_1puI6qd*$lLD5W(+SJ|1*o4GoHK{4LjRShoc}hNICZ]O+-R5\WxGn)?[DQmr{ Glenn Morris wrote (on Sun, 7 Sep 2008 at 22:23 -0400): > X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes > > can help in shutting it up a bit, but I'm not aware of any way to not > get mail when a bug one opened is closed. Oh, I also use a procmail rule that would work for you: :0 * ^X-Emacs-PR-Message: (transcript|closed) /dev/null (while waiting for bug #749) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 17 12:22:29 2009 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2009 17:22:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3Y-0006um-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3X-0006uX-7I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:27 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLK3S-0002LA-Ed; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19242.26830.317927.267307@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:22 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org reassign 936 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3060 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3140 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 252 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 335 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 749 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 750 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 922 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1780 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1826 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2472 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 3267 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 430 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 860 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1030 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2091 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 2645 debbugs.gnu.org unarchive 388 unarchive 389 unarchive 1567 unarchive 1568 unarchive 1886 reassign 388 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 389 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1567 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1568 debbugs.gnu.org reassign 1886 debbugs.gnu.org archive 388 archive 389 archive 1567 archive 1568 archive 1886 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 20 19:38:01 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2010 00:38:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NXl3a-0001Js-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:38:01 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NXl3L-0001Jm-0o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:37:52 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NXl2v-0006ua-Sl; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:37:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19287.41401.857385.254635@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:37:13 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: control X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 5388 moreinfo tags 922 wontfix tags 927 wontfix close 994 From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:17:02 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Subject: bug#922: closed (Re: bug#922: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com) Message-ID: References: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 922 X-Gnu-PR-Package: debbugs.gnu.org X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: wontfix Reply-To: 922@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:15:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1317755703-26557-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1317755703-26557-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #922: unwanted mail from debbugs.gnu.org which was filed against the debbugs.gnu.org package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 922@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 922: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D922 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1317755703-26557-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 922-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2011 19:14:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBASB-0006u3-18 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:14:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBAS8-0006tw-JY for 922-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:14:57 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBAQf-0003u9-QL; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:13:25 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: 922-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#922: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com References: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> <06wshnpe8q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <18628.36370.124362.821020@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: AVN South Africa monarchist clones Lon Horiuchi terrorist X-Ran: : (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:29:38 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 922-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.4 (------) I think it is time to close this. I think it is reasonable that people get notifications when their reports are closed, and there does not need to be an "opt out" mechanism for this. Hope the close message you get because of this is not too annoying! :) ------------=_1317755703-26557-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >From karl@f7.net Sun Sep 7 13:54:10 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 20:54:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87Ks6Ts006212 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:54:07 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGn-0007Ra-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGl-0007RK-Ou for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55069 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRGl-0007RH-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGl-0005Ku-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:35834 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRF5-0001qf-2g for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:52:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGg-0005Js-Ec for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:54:02 -0400 Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74]:41125 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRGf-0005JW-UC for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:53:58 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl X-Envelope-To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id m87Krv110947; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:53:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 15:53:57 -0500 Message-Id: <200809072053.m87Krv110947@f7.net> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Subject: unwanted mail from donarmstrong.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) I did not submit my suggestion through "donarmstrong.com". (Although as one of the mailing list maintainers, I am well aware that all bug-emacs mail is going through there now.) I am surprised to be getting a reply from it. It is redundant and (for me) unwanted. Can it be configured to not do this except when people actually initiate the request through the system, or something? karl Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:40:05 -0700 From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Subject: bug#919 closed by Chong Yidong (distributions in lzma or bz2?) This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report which was filed against the emacs package: #919: distributions in lzma or bz2? It has been closed by Chong Yidong . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Chong Yidong by replying to this email. --=20 919: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D919 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 919-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 20:34:36 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87KYXvj031869 for <919-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:34:34 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 705A957E355; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Cc: 919-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. > Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. > (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) > > That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it > available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils > from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the > automake OK, I've made a not to do that. ------------=_1220820005-1204-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 18:48:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87Imdjx026895 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:48:41 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJP-00054m-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052K-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052F-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39106) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJN-00065N-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40385) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPHh-0008R1-UG for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:46:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-000653-Sh for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74]:51162 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-00064t-Hv for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:34 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id m87ImXL08116; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Message-Id: <200809071848.m87ImXL08116@f7.net> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) MIME-Version: 1.0 emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the automake options.) Best, karl ------------=_1220820005-1204-1-- ------------=_1317755703-26557-1--