GNU bug report logs - #9132
24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows

Previous Next

Packages: emacs, w32;

Reported by: sds <at> gnu.org

Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:14:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #29 received at 9132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: sds <at> gnu.org
Cc: 9132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#9132: 24.0.50; bootstrap failure on windows
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0400
> From: Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:13:08 -0400
> Reply-To: sds <at> gnu.org
> 
> $ bzr pull
> $ cd nt
> $ ./configure.bat --no-debug --with-gcc --cflags -IC:/gnu/gnuwin32/include --ldflags -LC:/gnu/gnuwin32/lib  --without-xpm
> $ c:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make bootstrap
> .......
> make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/lisp'
> C:/gnu/gnuwin32/bin/make -w  -C ../leim all
> [Please ignore a syntax error on the next line - it is intentional]
> /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
> /usr/bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file
> make[2]: Entering directory `C:/sds/src/emacs/trunk/leim'
> "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp -f batch-byte-compile quail/latin-ltx.el
> Symbol's function definition is void: batch-byte-compile

Is this a new thing?  When was the last time you succeeded to
bootstrap on Windows, and did something change in your system
configuration since then?  A new port of Bash, perhaps, or of Make, or
of GCC?

Anyway, leim/makefile.w32-in has this part:

  buildlisppath=$(CURDIR)/$(dot)$(dot)/lisp
  ...
  # Set EMACSLOADPATH correctly (already defined in environment).
  EMACSLOADPATH=$(buildlisppath)

Could you check if this somehow doesn't get defined correctly or
doesn't take effect?  E.g., perhaps $(CURDIR) evaluates to something
that's unpalatable to the native Windows build of Emacs?  Or maybe you
need to export it?

Also, if you type the failing command manually, does it succeed or
does it fail in the same way?




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 103 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.